287 hp vs. 300 hp
Originally Posted by Archbishop
Who was arguing that it couldn't? I Asked if it produced the same gains, and it seems, that spacers do nothing for the rev-up motor on thier own.
crawford plenum on a revup
and the motordyne with 1/2 spacer.
my vote is on the motordyne setup but .that would settle your debate instead of whos got the better rebuttle.
If you want when ever hydra decides to do a group by or one of his vendors...on both setups i would like to get one . but damn they aint cheap to by alone lmao.
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
No, it just seems in every thread your in your causing problems with your misinformation.
ARE YOU THAT DENSE?
https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...&postcount=258
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
You claimed it didn't lose any at all, and you were wrong. You are an idiot.
No it doesn't. Tony has been saying that too you. I wasn't wrong, I have actually owned the kit, you haven't. EOD.
Quote "Get the MREV2. It will give you the above curve with significant midrange gains. You can always add the spacer later for top end gains."
Quote "Get the MREV2. It will give you the above curve with significant midrange gains. You can always add the spacer later for top end gains."
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
You don't. MREV kit includes lower plenum, 5/16 spacer, and many other bolts. You got proven wrong and wrong again. It does not lose top end power period.
And with the 5/16 spacer:

Looks like the stock rev up is still making more power at redline to me. How many times do we have to go through this?
Then I guess Tony is lieing and your right and all the tests I have seen were wrong.
And why should we believe you when you say a exhaust system gains 20 hp on the dyno. lol!!! When everyone is telling you it doesn't even get close but your calling them names too and ignoring them.
And why should we believe you when you say a exhaust system gains 20 hp on the dyno. lol!!! When everyone is telling you it doesn't even get close but your calling them names too and ignoring them.
Who is everyone? Everyone in this thread so far have pointed out that the Mrev and Spacer still lose power over the stock Rev up at High RPMs. The whole Idea behind the the Mrev and spacer were to fatten up the midrange/upper Midrange, giving back the Torque that the Rev up lost over the 287hp version.
I posted many examples on Not only the Mrev, but the Exhaust Dynos as well. I'll let you wallow in your ignorance.
I posted many examples on Not only the Mrev, but the Exhaust Dynos as well. I'll let you wallow in your ignorance.
Again your ignoring what Tony said....put the spacer in there to gain your top end back.
Oh, yea and how you think the HR engine has a 7800 fuel cut. lol proven wrong again. 7500 max fuel cut.
Your on a roll being wrong in many threads.
Oh, yea and how you think the HR engine has a 7800 fuel cut. lol proven wrong again. 7500 max fuel cut.
Your on a roll being wrong in many threads.
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
I was referring the 1/2" spacer relative to the 5/16" spacer.
---
With the MREV2/spacer combo, the gain is not across the whole band, but the average within the rev range of any gear you shift, it will be higher.
The average is greater if you shift at redline and the difference only increases if you shift at anything less than redline.
So no matter how you shift, the average power will be greater with the MREV2/spacer combination.
---
With the MREV2/spacer combo, the gain is not across the whole band, but the average within the rev range of any gear you shift, it will be higher.
The average is greater if you shift at redline and the difference only increases if you shift at anything less than redline.
So no matter how you shift, the average power will be greater with the MREV2/spacer combination.
Again your ignoring the fact he said if you want your top end back, you put the 5/16 spacer in there. You keep ignoring that. Can't believe we have people like this on the net.
I am done for tonight. I will let others argue with this ethug.
Hi guys,
The above plot is real, but it is the MREV2 without the spacer.
In that same article they show the cumulation of the spacer added.
Compare the MREV2(with the 5/16" spacer) against baseline for the final result. The spacer is needed for the additional top end HP.
Tony
EDIT: For the REVUP engine, I always recommend doing both the spacer and MREV2 for this reason.
And if for example you can't purchase both at the same time. Get the MREV2. It will give you the above curve with significant midrange gains. You can always add the spacer later for top end gains.
But don't do just the spacer on a REVUP lower collector. They don't work on REVUP lower collectors. Spacers and upper plenum mods only work on non-revup lower collectors and MREV2 lower collectors.
I hope this isn't throughly confusing.
I am done for tonight. I will let others argue with this ethug.
Hi guys,
The above plot is real, but it is the MREV2 without the spacer.
In that same article they show the cumulation of the spacer added.
Compare the MREV2(with the 5/16" spacer) against baseline for the final result. The spacer is needed for the additional top end HP.
Tony
EDIT: For the REVUP engine, I always recommend doing both the spacer and MREV2 for this reason.
And if for example you can't purchase both at the same time. Get the MREV2. It will give you the above curve with significant midrange gains. You can always add the spacer later for top end gains.
But don't do just the spacer on a REVUP lower collector. They don't work on REVUP lower collectors. Spacers and upper plenum mods only work on non-revup lower collectors and MREV2 lower collectors.
I hope this isn't throughly confusing.



