You know, its been proven that Headers do not do much on the VQ, and neither does the Crawford plenum. The MREV kit has shown to gain the most power.

Why not do some research on this forum and see what all the results were instead of pulling graphs out of the manufacture websites. People who have actually tested these know more than what you are posting.

 

Listen dip****. That WAS someones dyno, not Crawford's. I just posted up 3 different dynos PROVING that the MREV2 loses power above 6200rpm. It lowers the RPM when you hit peak HP as well. What have YOU proved?

Same member, Crawford manifold Dyno alone

I'm going to beat you over the head with this.

 

So you think because YOU said so we should believe you right? Umm no. I believe what I have tested, what I have seen others tested, etc. Even your Motordyne dyno shows only a 5hp loss.

I don't need to prove anything to someone who wants to call someone names or beat someone over the head. I suggest do some studying on this subject, or contact Tony at MotorDyne himself.

 

And AGIAN! All motor build that revs To 8000K. At 7000rpm, You have already lost over 10whp.

 

You are stupid. Really. For people who want to make power, its obvious that using the Rev up manifold is the better choice. Sure the Mrev2 is a great product that fattens up the mid range, but you do lose your power were you should be gaining, in the upper rpm range.

 

Let us go over this again.

Wrong.

Now you start to back track. I didn't know that 10whp at 7000rpm was the same as 2-5hp at 6200rpm

Now you story is 5hp at most. But as we all know, I posted over 3 different dynos that proved that statement incorrect.

Explain the dyno's I posted then. Since when was the majority always right? As I recall, a lot of people buy it, because "it provides power were I can use it in Daily Driving"

Gain the most power compared to what? Crawford Doesn't make power. Everything I posted so far must have been stuff I pulled out my ***, correct?

 

Actually you have no clue what your talking about so I am done. Anyone who THINKS the MREV Kit on a REV-UP engine isn't worth it is blinded. It is the most bang for the buck mod and has been proven to show the most power gains and 1/4 times over any other mod.

 

Looks like your hated pretty bad on this site for not knowing wtf your talking about.

https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...&postcount=418

 

Power under the curve is more important than power at redline.

 

Truth. I never claimed it wasn't. But Crawfords manifold gained from 5800rpm and up. I personally would prefer a mod that enhances what I already have, such as top end power. The Mrev doesn't just add power, it changes were it is delivered, at around 200+rpm lower than before, meaning you could be losing time shifting at redline.


And I do remember one member who tracked his car said he was pulling faster speeds with the Rev-up manifold and with the Mrev2.


As for me being hated, who cares, its the Internet. If I thought a bodykit on a roadster Z was ugly, get over it. Its what I think.

 

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....61#post4167161

This guy argueing that the MREV kit isn't worth it, is someone that is a ignorant a$$ on this forum. HE has proven time and time again to be nothing more than a a$$.

 

Obviosily you have never owned a MREV Kit yourself and if its so bad, why were you interested in purchasing one? Yea thats right, I saw your posts. Hondas have top-end power but no TQ. They are slow as crap till they get into that VTEC range. Mid-Range and Avearage mean of power is the most important gain for any type of performance.

Actually it does add power and dynos prove that and so does 1/4 times.

 

Funny thread! but what has me confused is what determines which Z's get a rev-up and which ones get the non rev-up?

I've tried searching to figure it out but nothing...

 

Hi guys,

The above plot is real, but it is the MREV2 without the spacer.
In that same article they show the cumulation of the spacer added.

Compare the MREV2(with the 5/16" spacer) against baseline for the final result. The spacer is needed for the additional top end HP.

Tony

EDIT: For the REVUP engine, I always recommend doing both the spacer and MREV2 for this reason.
And if for example you can't purchase both at the same time. Get the MREV2. It will give you the above curve with significant midrange gains. You can always add the spacer later for top end gains.

But don't do just the spacer on a REVUP lower collector. They don't work on REVUP lower collectors. Spacers and upper plenum mods only work on non-revup lower collectors and MREV2 lower collectors.

I hope this isn't throughly confusing.

 

Like I said, the MREV kit doesn't hardly lose any power. Most MREV kits have the 5/16 spacer.

Thank you for clarifying that for us Tony.

 

No, And thank you for responding to my message and adding your input here. Now what do you think about the Crawford manifold?

 

It performs very similarly to our 1/2" spacer. Essentially identical.

A little more top end and a little less TQ (and area under the curve) than the 5/16" spacer.

 

I agree with what Archbiship is saying, SOLO refuses to beleive a Crawford upper plenum alone can add top-end power to the REVUP-whereas the 03' lower collector on the REVUP fattens up midrange but KILLS top end (6000-7000rpm) thats why they need the 5/16" spacer to gain back most of what they lost, and they still lose power from 6200-7000rpm's but its minimal compared to the nice gains in the midrange under that.

 

It's okay, you got proven wrong.

 

Part of a MREV kit is the 5/16 spacer, and that is why it gains all low and top end like I been saying all along.

But a Crawford gain on a REV-UP? Haven't seen it.