Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

what no sunroof?!?.........

Old Jun 3, 2002 | 12:41 AM
  #2  
robbyn's Avatar
robbyn
Charter Member #79
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: dc
Default

I agree the car is too small for a sunroof. BUT I am wondering why Nissan didn't offer T-Tops. I certainly am no expert, but it was my understanding that T-Tops will provide the rigidity (if that's a word) that a sports car needs. Assuming I'm right on this, anyone have any idea whether putting T-Tops on the Z would f&*( up the car?
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2002 | 02:52 AM
  #3  
cheap's Avatar
cheap
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham, NH
Default

T-tops don't really provide structural support the way a solid roof would. However, since Nissan is making a convertable version, you'd think they have that problem covered...

I've heard of Camaros at the track literally ejecting their t-tops from chassis twist / torque, and without em in all that is there is the little mid-bar or whatever it's called.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2002 | 03:21 AM
  #4  
Zmeflyby's Avatar
Zmeflyby
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: texas
Default

2 words
Sports Car
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2002 | 06:29 AM
  #5  
john0213's Avatar
john0213
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Canada
Default

i think T-top cuz too much~
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2002 | 05:34 PM
  #7  
Phi-1002-'s Avatar
Phi-1002-
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Farmington Hills, Michigan
Default

Originally posted by cheap
I've heard of Camaros at the track literally ejecting their t-tops from chassis twist / torque, and without em in all that is there is the little mid-bar or whatever it's called.
This is true. I had an LS-1 Trans Am up until a year ago. Very powerful car but the T-Tops twist a great deal and you can even see it when hard on the throttle if you're brave enough to look.

I'll take mine with a fixed roof.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2002 | 06:20 PM
  #9  
dvlad's Avatar
dvlad
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: James Brown
Default

a targa top would nice. I would like to see a 911 style targa roof. Where the whole roof slides down to the rear window.

The only problem is that the roof line of the 350 is very short. So i don't know if this would be possible.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2002 | 07:41 PM
  #10  
Zdude's Avatar
Zdude
Charter Member #31
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default The 240 had a fixed roof

As I was driving my '71 Z yesterday (which I rarely do now) I began thinking about the antenna, T-top and 2+2 versions that came out with the ZX models. Many feel, as I do, that Nissan took a hard left turn away from the real idea of the Z when they went with the ZX. It was a luxury car masquerading as a sports car. As I drove my '71, I could see what Nissan is trying to get back to, giving us the fixed antenna, fixed roof, and limited luxury items that really don't belong in a car that was designed to be fun to drive with a ****-pit interior.

I guess that my point is that after driving a 240Z, my misaligned expectations where corrected. The Z was not a T-top, leather equipped, four-seater. It was a car whose focal point was the driving experience, with very little fluff.

Driving my 240Z, with it original AM, two-speaker radio is an experience in acceleration and cornering. I am now hoping that the 350Z lives up to the 240Z and I think that that is what Nissan is shooting for.

I'm hooked on my 240Z (like many others from 240~280Z) because of they way it feels to drive, not race, not even drive fast and I'm hooked.

Sorry to be so long winded, but I trying to articulate "Z passion" and I've definitely have it.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2002 | 11:02 PM
  #11  
jran76's Avatar
jran76
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Plano (Dallas), TX
Default Re: The 240 had a fixed roof

Originally posted by Zdude
As I was driving my '71 Z yesterday (which I rarely do now) I began thinking about the antenna, T-top and 2+2 versions that came out with the ZX models. Many feel, as I do, that Nissan took a hard left turn away from the real idea of the Z when they went with the ZX. It was a luxury car masquerading as a sports car. As I drove my '71, I could see what Nissan is trying to get back to, giving us the fixed antenna, fixed roof, and limited luxury items that really don't belong in a car that was designed to be fun to drive with a ****-pit interior.

I guess that my point is that after driving a 240Z, my misaligned expectations where corrected. The Z was not a T-top, leather equipped, four-seater. It was a car whose focal point was the driving experience, with very little fluff.

Driving my 240Z, with it original AM, two-speaker radio is an experience in acceleration and cornering. I am now hoping that the 350Z lives up to the 240Z and I think that that is what Nissan is shooting for.

I'm hooked on my 240Z (like many others from 240~280Z) because of they way it feels to drive, not race, not even drive fast and I'm hooked.

Sorry to be so long winded, but I trying to articulate "Z passion" and I've definitely have it.

I agree, after driving a Maxima (which I really like) for the past 3 years, I want a sports car (a sporting car?), no side airbags, no sunroof, etc. I would like it to be a little lighter, but I can work with it. Plus, they are coming out with a convertable for those who would like it (not me).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BumbleZee
OZOC (Orlando Z Owners Club)
2
Sep 26, 2015 01:00 AM
ILoveDrifting
Upcoming Events
0
Sep 7, 2015 03:15 PM
spacemanspiff
Exterior & Interior
61
Jul 21, 2006 09:13 AM
zillinois
Wheels & Tires
47
Jun 22, 2004 02:58 PM
wadd3456
Exterior & Interior
6
Mar 3, 2004 02:50 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:16 AM.