Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

Test mule Spy pics and Video?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #201  
CSTrack's Avatar
CSTrack
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Default

Am I the only one who thinks the mule isn't the next Z, rather a 240? I doubt the Z's wheelbase and length would shrink THAT much...
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 11:54 AM
  #202  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
And why not? 350hp doesn't seem far-fetched at all. The G37 is what, 330hp? I'd imagine the Z having more power than the G by that time.

Not too sure about the hard-top convertable, but it would sure look nice.
+1
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 11:54 AM
  #203  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

Originally Posted by CSTrack
Am I the only one who thinks the mule isn't the next Z, rather a 240? I doubt the Z's wheelbase and length would shrink THAT much...
I don't see why the 240 would be benchmarking against a Cayman.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #204  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

yea 350z or newer Z would be proper benchmarking with the caymen remember the 350zs benchmark was the porshe boxer
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 12:13 PM
  #205  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
bboypuertoroc
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 22,917
Likes: 2,451
From: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Default

To go with the above though, I would still love to see an S16 come about. Replace the Altima coupe with it.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #206  
vaughn1576's Avatar
vaughn1576
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by CSTrack
Am I the only one who thinks the mule isn't the next Z, rather a 240? I doubt the Z's wheelbase and length would shrink THAT much...
The new wheelbase (roughly 97 inches) is on par with all of its pure sports car competition, as well as some less powerful models such as the Solstice/Sky. S2000 wheelbase is 94.5 by comparison. What's more important is how well the weight is distributed over the span of that wheelbase while remaining relatively comfortable for the passengers.

Last edited by vaughn1576; Jun 20, 2007 at 12:25 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #207  
CSTrack's Avatar
CSTrack
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Default

Originally Posted by blasian
I don't see why the 240 would be benchmarking against a Cayman.
Putting it that way makes more sense. I guess Nissan wants to clearly distinguish the dimensions and sportiness between the next Z and the much anticipated GT-R. Let's just hope the diminutive proportions will result in a substantial weight loss!
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #208  
kaizenro1's Avatar
kaizenro1
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
From: Burbank
Default

Originally Posted by CSTrack
Am I the only one who thinks the mule isn't the next Z, rather a 240? I doubt the Z's wheelbase and length would shrink THAT much...
That's what I'm saying. I posted a thread from another source (I think it got deleted) with the same pics and they said the 350z panels were used/adjusted for the shorter wheelbase.

We all know there's sites that steal and use pics from other articles and come up with a new story.

I'm going with the one I saw.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 03:55 PM
  #209  
blasian's Avatar
blasian
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 1
From: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Default

Originally Posted by kaizenro1
That's what I'm saying. I posted a thread from another source (I think it got deleted) with the same pics and they said the 350z panels were used/adjusted for the shorter wheelbase.

We all know there's sites that steal and use pics from other articles and come up with a new story.

I'm going with the one I saw.
Please read my previous statement.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 04:12 PM
  #210  
vaughn1576's Avatar
vaughn1576
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by kaizenro1
That's what I'm saying. I posted a thread from another source (I think it got deleted) with the same pics and they said the 350z panels were used/adjusted for the shorter wheelbase.

We all know there's sites that steal and use pics from other articles and come up with a new story.

I'm going with the one I saw.
There will be a small rear wheel coupe from Nissan, but this isn't it.

If you read this the thread here you'll see that, because it's kinda obvious from all of the clues.

If you don't see it... God bless you.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 05:56 PM
  #211  
risin's Avatar
risin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

At first i was disappointed with the shorter wheelbase. But as long as it has short overhangs it will look fine. I'm excited to see the z34. Hopefully real pics late this yr or early 08.

I dont think nissan would test a cheaper rwd coup with 19 wheels and big brakes. I don't think nissan will bring out a cheaper rwd coup because that would mean using fm platform.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 06:41 PM
  #212  
vaughn1576's Avatar
vaughn1576
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

It is pretty conceivable that the new small rear wheel drive coupe could use the FM platform. With an all aluminum e4 cylinder engine and a minimalist approach interior, the weight could approach the 2840 lbs of the Solstice or even the 2460 of the MX-5. I won’t even mention the traditional Silvia competitors of the Eclipse (3200- 3400lbs) or the Tiburon (2900- 3100 lbs), they are grossly overweight. The shortened FM of the new Z is also close to the 95 inches of the Solstice. Plus, they would save a ton of money in the process.

This scenario is probable due to the limited use for an all new rear wheel drive platform. What other models could they derive from it (that will sell) to spread the cost? With Nissan being very cost conscious lately I can’t see the investment in a new platform with questionable earnings potential.

You never know though…
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 12:33 AM
  #213  
d2d2's Avatar
d2d2
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: california
Default

I dont care about the wheelbase or weight now. I just want to know when this car is going to be able to purchase hah.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 07:13 AM
  #214  
350Zenophile's Avatar
350Zenophile
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,350
Likes: 4
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by d2d2
I dont care about the wheelbase or weight now. I just want to know when this car is going to be able to purchase hah.
Remember, this will also be the 1st year of a new gen Z. Like the 2003-2004, I would expect some bugs needing working out. So if this model follows suit with a mid-year upgrade, like the 2004.5 was, you are looking at 2010 for the bug-fix model.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 08:30 AM
  #215  
NA350Z's Avatar
NA350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

I wonder why they're being so secretive about the new Z, the G coupe concept has been out over 2 years.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 08:37 AM
  #216  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
bboypuertoroc
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 22,917
Likes: 2,451
From: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Default

Originally Posted by vaughn1576
I won’t even mention the traditional Silvia competitors of the Eclipse (3200- 3400lbs)…
The competitor that was around during that time (the 1G and 2G DSM's) did not weigh that much. They were under 3000lbs (especially the 1G... I think it was between 2700-2800).
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #217  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
bboypuertoroc
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 22,917
Likes: 2,451
From: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Default

Originally Posted by vaughn1576
If you don't see it... God bless you.
LMAO...

I just read your sig man... wow. I musta missed something in there.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #218  
vaughn1576's Avatar
vaughn1576
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
LMAO...

I just read your sig man... wow. I musta missed something in there.

Yeah it was tragic comedy over in the OT today. I'm sure you've checked it out by now. Unbelievable stuff!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 03:19 PM
  #219  
vaughn1576's Avatar
vaughn1576
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
The competitor that was around during that time (the 1G and 2G DSM's) did not weigh that much. They were under 3000lbs (especially the 1G... I think it was between 2700-2800).
That weight target sounds about right.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #220  
KhanMan's Avatar
KhanMan
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood California
Default

Originally Posted by CSTrack
Am I the only one who thinks the mule isn't the next Z, rather a 240? I doubt the Z's wheelbase and length would shrink THAT much...
No I suggested a few posts before that this could be the next 240SX but called a 250SX and have the new VQ25HR motor. And one source suggested this could be the Test muel version of that XBox concept car nissan showed a while back.

Last edited by KhanMan; Jun 21, 2007 at 08:27 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 PM.