Official 370Z specs, with links & new pics - the real thing - 11.15.08
Great shots with the Z and GTR there... two fantastic looking cars IMO. Lets face it, compared especially to other Japanese manufacturers, Nissan is at least giving us some sports cars. Look at Honda, Toyota and ill even throw Mazda in...
No question, the Cayman S at MSRP is a rip-off... the reason I didn't buy one. And the 370Z at $35-40K is quite a value, especially now compared to the 350Z.
But I'm looking at 2 year old Cayman S's... around $40K-$45K... so similar price point. The major depreciation hit has already occurred... find a certified used example, and it comes with a 100K mile warranty. Thank you, tanked economy.
But I'm looking at 2 year old Cayman S's... around $40K-$45K... so similar price point. The major depreciation hit has already occurred... find a certified used example, and it comes with a 100K mile warranty. Thank you, tanked economy.
Anyway, the Cayman S came in at $70,810, including transportation.
Admittedly, we don't yet have the pricing for the 370Z, but let's make the assumption that it will be around $38K. That's nearly a $33,000 difference.
In fairness, we need to compare apples to apples.
So, it's unfair to compare a 2 year old Cayman S price against a brand new Z price. What do 2 year old comparably equipped 350Zs go for? That's the price we should use when comparing used vehicles. In any event, the difference between a used Nissan and a used Porsche will probably widen, since the Porsche will usually tend to hold its value better than a Nissan. Not a comment on quality, reliability or lust factor. Just reality.
I'm a Porsche nut from way back. I love those cars. My wife drives a Cayenne S and it's a great car. I've been looking at a used Cayman S for some time now. It's also a great car.
However, the 370Z injects a new alternative at a much more affordable price. Nissan got my attention and, depending on the performance and price of the 370, I will give it serious consideration.
If I can get a fully loaded 370Z for around $38k that will be competitive with the Cayman S, Nissan may just make a conquest sale.
After all, let's not forget what this is really about; selling units. Japanese manufacturers don't drive the first rivet without a full business case study for a new model to determine what competitors, and trends are out there in the market. Nissan has obviously (and correctly, I would argue) deduced that there are more people willing to buy a $30K-$38K sports car versus a $60k-$75K sports car, given that the performance of both cars is comparable. Unlike Porsche, Nissan is a volume manufacturer, not a niche manufacturer. Although in recent years, with models the the Cayenne and the new Panorama filling previously ignored market segments, some would argue that Porsche has become a small scale volume builder, too. But really, Porsche has VW to fill their need for volume product.
The Z will be a winner with or without us. Nissan knows this. They would prefer to have all of us on board with the new 370, but they don't NEED us for the car to be successful. We'd all do well to remember that fact. And stop our ridiculous whining about headlights and weight and blah, blah, blah.
The Z is, and always has been, a superb value. Get those cars on the lot, Nissan, and let's get on with enjoying them.
Just my $.02.
zed-er
yes, it's just a black lense for cost cutting--the euro cars get the rear fog light and we do not, instead of reshaping the rear bumper to delete the rear fog, they just put a black cap over it for USDM models. Yes, this is true, learn to believe it.
No, that F1 Renault car is a brake light, not a fog light...I'm sure you could have figured out that yourself...
And again, NO it serves no purpose on the USDM 370Z.
F*** the cosmetic BS... Is that a diff cooler I spy under there?
Last edited by gothchick; Nov 17, 2008 at 01:03 PM.
Over the weekend, I went on the Porsche website and "built" my own Cayman S, including standard leather, 19" wheels, HIDs, Bose stereo w/Nav - not every option by a long shot. I was just trying to APPROXIMATE the equipment on a fully loaded 370Z Touring with Sport and Premium packages.
Anyway, the Cayman S came in at $70,810, including transportation.
Admittedly, we don't yet have the pricing for the 370Z, but let's make the assumption that it will be around $38K. That's nearly a $33,000 difference.
In fairness, we need to compare apples to apples.
So, it's unfair to compare a 2 year old Cayman S price against a brand new Z price. What do 2 year old comparably equipped 350Zs go for? That's the price we should use when comparing used vehicles. In any event, the difference between a used Nissan and a used Porsche will probably widen, since the Porsche will usually tend to hold its value better than a Nissan. Not a comment on quality, reliability or lust factor. Just reality.
I'm a Porsche nut from way back. I love those cars. My wife drives a Cayenne S and it's a great car. I've been looking at a used Cayman S for some time now. It's also a great car.
However, the 370Z injects a new alternative at a much more affordable price. Nissan got my attention and, depending on the performance and price of the 370, I will give it serious consideration.
If I can get a fully loaded 370Z for around $38k that will be competitive with the Cayman S, Nissan may just make a conquest sale.
After all, let's not forget what this is really about; selling units. Japanese manufacturers don't drive the first rivet without a full business case study for a new model to determine what competitors, and trends are out there in the market. Nissan has obviously (and correctly, I would argue) deduced that there are more people willing to buy a $30K-$38K sports car versus a $60k-$75K sports car, given that the performance of both cars is comparable. Unlike Porsche, Nissan is a volume manufacturer, not a niche manufacturer. Although in recent years, with models the the Cayenne and the new Panorama filling previously ignored market segments, some would argue that Porsche has become a small scale volume builder, too. But really, Porsche has VW to fill their need for volume product.
The Z will be a winner with or without us. Nissan knows this. They would prefer to have all of us on board with the new 370, but they don't NEED us for the car to be successful. We'd all do well to remember that fact. And stop our ridiculous whining about headlights and weight and blah, blah, blah.
The Z is, and always has been, a superb value. Get those cars on the lot, Nissan, and let's get on with enjoying them.
Just my $.02.
zed-er
Anyway, the Cayman S came in at $70,810, including transportation.
Admittedly, we don't yet have the pricing for the 370Z, but let's make the assumption that it will be around $38K. That's nearly a $33,000 difference.
In fairness, we need to compare apples to apples.
So, it's unfair to compare a 2 year old Cayman S price against a brand new Z price. What do 2 year old comparably equipped 350Zs go for? That's the price we should use when comparing used vehicles. In any event, the difference between a used Nissan and a used Porsche will probably widen, since the Porsche will usually tend to hold its value better than a Nissan. Not a comment on quality, reliability or lust factor. Just reality.
I'm a Porsche nut from way back. I love those cars. My wife drives a Cayenne S and it's a great car. I've been looking at a used Cayman S for some time now. It's also a great car.
However, the 370Z injects a new alternative at a much more affordable price. Nissan got my attention and, depending on the performance and price of the 370, I will give it serious consideration.
If I can get a fully loaded 370Z for around $38k that will be competitive with the Cayman S, Nissan may just make a conquest sale.
After all, let's not forget what this is really about; selling units. Japanese manufacturers don't drive the first rivet without a full business case study for a new model to determine what competitors, and trends are out there in the market. Nissan has obviously (and correctly, I would argue) deduced that there are more people willing to buy a $30K-$38K sports car versus a $60k-$75K sports car, given that the performance of both cars is comparable. Unlike Porsche, Nissan is a volume manufacturer, not a niche manufacturer. Although in recent years, with models the the Cayenne and the new Panorama filling previously ignored market segments, some would argue that Porsche has become a small scale volume builder, too. But really, Porsche has VW to fill their need for volume product.
The Z will be a winner with or without us. Nissan knows this. They would prefer to have all of us on board with the new 370, but they don't NEED us for the car to be successful. We'd all do well to remember that fact. And stop our ridiculous whining about headlights and weight and blah, blah, blah.
The Z is, and always has been, a superb value. Get those cars on the lot, Nissan, and let's get on with enjoying them.
Just my $.02.
zed-er
Thanks for saving me the writting..I was also in the market for a possibly used caymen s & the lotus elise but I could not justify the price.
I considered a 2 year old used Veyron. But it wasn't worth it to me. And the 10 year old Miata was less expensive, but it wasn't worth it to me, either.
It's called consumption, and consumers compare mainly based on price points, not on some etheral definition of "fair"... which only exists in fantasy land. There's no such thing as "fair" in the real world, and I can compare anything I want to... it's MY money. And I am comparing a CS and a 370Z, because those are the 2 primary vehicles competing for my dollars right now. A C6 Vette would be in 3rd, but a very distant 3rd. I'm just not a Vette guy, and even though the power is tempting, it lacks in other departments.
I understand what you are saying, but both the CS and 370Z are attainable at my budget, and many others looking for a sports car in the $40K range. So while it may not be a "fair" comparison in your eyes, it's a very "real" comparison.
price is for sure "the" main index, because I don't think you pay cars with peanuts. (unless you have a peanut butter company)
for sure, in "any year" car comparison.. the new car is going to be the worst in the price/what_you_get deal.
in the long run, it's a different ball game. depends what you want to do with the car.
for sure, maintanance is going to be more expensive on a porsche, mods either and so on...
Not to mention Porsche has no "real" aftermarket performance parts program.
Maybe Nismo will come up with some nicer looking 19 X 9.5 and 19 X 11" (the max width Bridgestone tire recommends) wheels, sport suspension, light flywheel and a plate type LSD for the 370 Z...
Maybe Nismo will come up with some nicer looking 19 X 9.5 and 19 X 11" (the max width Bridgestone tire recommends) wheels, sport suspension, light flywheel and a plate type LSD for the 370 Z...
and even with a cayman several useful track parts can be swapped (suspension arms to adjust camber, euro bucket seats, some engine accessories track oriented).. the bad part is they are damn expensive.
and, added bonus, they have a good support for track junkies.
not true... porsche, if you get a GT3 has all you need in house.
and even with a cayman several useful track parts can be swapped (suspension arms to adjust camber, euro bucket seats, some engine accessories track oriented).. the bad part is they are damn expensive.
and, added bonus, they have a good support for track junkies.
and even with a cayman several useful track parts can be swapped (suspension arms to adjust camber, euro bucket seats, some engine accessories track oriented).. the bad part is they are damn expensive.
and, added bonus, they have a good support for track junkies.
It is true that many GT3 parts will bolt on the Cayman, particularly the front suspension and some brake stuff, but it is expensive and there is nothing for the rear suspension.
It is not as though Porsche has well thought out performance kits for the Cayman; as a matter of fact they want to keep the Cayman clearly slower than the 911.
I like Nissan's Nismo stuff for street mods because it fits and works without hassle, even if a little pricey.
I almost added that Porsche has a Motorsport division. They don't really like selling competition parts for street cars (they will do it if you know exactly what you want) and they won't sell engine parts at all- they wouldn't even sell me some GT3 rod bearings the other day even though they were normal dealer available.
something that on a Z is around 5K and on a cayman S is just 10 (4K just for the seats)
the good part is that being a cheaper car, tuning parts are cheaper...
and given 60 grand if you can afford a cayman S... you can get a 350z and put 25K in tuning and make donuts around a stock cayman S on any track.
This is my first post here I am currently deployed to iraq, and have been looking around here for a while my current ride is 03 Eclipse Gt Spyder looking to upgrade to either 08 350z or 370z. But enough backstory and back on topic I hope this is not a repost for fear of flame lol. But I found these pictures dont know if they have been put up already.



Can be seen here
http://370ztech.com/
Sorry if this is repost of pictures there are alot of threads on this car I searched I am a member of club3g with same user name.



Can be seen here
http://370ztech.com/
Sorry if this is repost of pictures there are alot of threads on this car I searched I am a member of club3g with same user name.
The R35 is only 2" wider than the Z34. It's also 2" taller than the Z which further contributes to the Z's low, squat and aggressive stance.

For the last time, I said a used Cayman S, so the pricing is about the same as a new 370Z.
The balance is that a 370Z will depreciate faster than a used CS... being a newer car. It would end up costing about the same to own the used CS for a couple of years as it would to own a new 370Z and take the depreciation hit.
103) The car's rear light must be illuminated at all times when it is running on wet or extreme-weather tyres. It shall be at the discretion of the race director to decide if a driver should be stopped because his rear light is not working. Should a car be stopped in this way it may re-join when the fault has been remedied.








