Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

Nismo 370z vs. 370z SP Touring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #1  
PA 19103's Avatar
PA 19103
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Default Nismo 370z vs. 370z SP Touring

So what is the point of a Nismo? Those numbers don't make sense.

http://blogs.edmunds.com/straightlin...hotopanel..2.*
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 07:25 PM
  #2  
norapat01's Avatar
norapat01
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Default

Because the Nismo version is $1000 cheaper than the standard 370Z....

Vehicle: 2009 Nissan Nismo 370Z

Odometer: 1,027
Date: 06/16/09
Driver: Josh Jacquot
Price: $39,340

Vehicle: 2009 Nissan 370Z

Odometer: N/A
Date: 06/16/09
Driver: Josh Jacquot
Price: $40,320
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #3  
avandss's Avatar
avandss
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: Canada, montreal
Default

damn the nismo has 350hp yet its slower on the 1/4 mile and 0-60 according to edmunds data

how does this make any sense?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 09:31 PM
  #4  
bigdog1250's Avatar
bigdog1250
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Sonoma, CA
Default

14 hp more is not very much (especially since less restrictive exhaust has proven to add about that much power to the wheels on the 370z)... perhaps the aero package adds some weight, it is 6 inches longer overall. What I do like about the nismo 370z is that spoiler. I have been saying for years that the Z needs a Porsche GT2ish spoiler. Finally someone listened.

I would opt for a base Z with sport package. Save myself 7 grand
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #5  
SniperHunter's Avatar
SniperHunter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by avandss
damn the nismo has 350hp yet its slower on the 1/4 mile and 0-60 according to edmunds data

how does this make any sense?
It's not slower. Those differences are merely statistical noise. I'm sure the Nismo probably hasn't been broken in, yet either. VQs get quicker with age.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2009 | 10:02 PM
  #6  
350ZNISMO673's Avatar
350ZNISMO673
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Beavercreek, OH
Default

Although I like the NISMO styling, sounds like the touring is better. Go figure?

Last edited by 350ZNISMO673; Jun 17, 2009 at 10:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 03:55 AM
  #7  
singh's Avatar
singh
_______________
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,352
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Arnold K.
It's not slower. Those differences are merely statistical noise. I'm sure the Nismo probably hasn't been broken in, yet either. VQs get quicker with age.
no with that logic the same can be said for the touring.

But I am shocked at the price of the touring.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 08:08 AM
  #8  
Lento's Avatar
Lento
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
Default

Wow thats really is surprising.

But like any track car where it really counts is how many seconds it can shave off lap times.

I think when track tests are done you will find the Nismo much more stable through long sweeping turns and such. Espeically since the areo kit doesnt come into play until 75 mph the testing done for the braking and Slolomn are both performed at speeds < 75 mph

On the other side of the spectrum, if the Nismo fails to deliver, maybe nissan will upgrade the hell out of it until it blows the standard Z out of the water for the 2010 model.

Nissan has always been noted for having problems in their first year of production for most of their cars.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 08:12 AM
  #9  
Hraesvelg's Avatar
Hraesvelg
Got Uranium?
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 35,723
Likes: 6
From: The Recliner of Rage
Default

Reply
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 09:03 AM
  #10  
lugrug's Avatar
lugrug
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

That just doesn't compute. I agree that when the engine gets broken in a bit more it will get a bit faster, but how the handling can be that much worse is beyond reason. A .91 skidpad? That's significantly worse than any review I've seen. On paper the 18 hp upgrade outweighs the slight weight gain over base, but in this test the heavier Touring with less HP is faster. Defies the laws of physics. Maybe the driver let his kid drive the NISMO.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 12:21 PM
  #11  
Midas78's Avatar
Midas78
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, FL
Default

Finally, proof that the "fangs" make the car go faster. j/k
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #12  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Midas78
Finally, proof that the "fangs" make the car go faster. j/k
+1, fangsftwmfgdw!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 10:39 AM
  #13  
yoshe77's Avatar
yoshe77
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: fort sill,ok
Default

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
Jan 2, 2022 12:58 PM
Dsowe
Exterior & Interior
15
Feb 17, 2021 10:38 AM
Jambo016
New Owners
27
Sep 16, 2016 01:08 PM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM
nanotech
Exhaust
6
Oct 2, 2015 05:02 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM.