Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

Am I the only one who thinks the 370Z looks much better than the 350?

Old Jul 3, 2009 | 09:13 AM
  #61  
lyork92's Avatar
lyork92
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

i have a 350z
but i love the way the 370 has this stance like it's about to pounce on you like a pit bull.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 11:09 AM
  #62  
Cane's Avatar
Cane
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

The 370Z overall wasn't anywhere near as exciting or good looking as the 350z's release since the 370Z more or less looks like a 350 with a body kit on it. When the 350 came out it really turned a lot of heads and to this day ppl don't know wtf it is other than its 'cool'.

That said the 370 is still a great ride. I have a feeling that midway through its life-cycle when it gets an exterior revision it'll look even better.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #63  
newtkindred's Avatar
newtkindred
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: san francisco, california
Default

Originally Posted by Cane
The 370Z overall wasn't anywhere near as exciting or good looking as the 350z's release since the 370Z more or less looks like a 350 with a body kit on it. When the 350 came out it really turned a lot of heads and to this day ppl don't know wtf it is other than its 'cool'.

That said the 370 is still a great ride. I have a feeling that midway through its life-cycle when it gets an exterior revision it'll look even better.
I think the 350Z was exciting partly because the "Z" had been gone from the market for so long. It was the long absence that created a lot of the buzz.

I think the 370Z looks much more than a 350Z with a body kit. You can tell it has been shortened at the rear, making the hood appear longer, like the original Z's. The way the hatch curves down is too like the original Z. The stance is wider with bigger flares adding more of a presence. The lines are curvy instead of sharp like the outgoing model. The headlights and taillights have been tightened up and detailed adding more style than the simple geometry of the 350Z's.

All this while keeping some 350Z lineage intact. Quite and accomplishement in my opinion. Bringing back the 240Z lines while keeping the 350Z DNA there.

Finally, I have to defer on the assessment that the 370Z is not as good looking upon its release. I think it looks much better.

Last edited by newtkindred; Jul 3, 2009 at 12:59 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #64  
Teufel's Avatar
Teufel
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,817
Likes: 1
From: Hölle
Default



Last edited by Teufel; Jul 3, 2009 at 01:29 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 02:26 PM
  #65  
Spork's Avatar
Spork
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 27,592
Likes: 6
From: MN
Default

Originally Posted by opathal

Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 03:36 PM
  #66  
newtkindred's Avatar
newtkindred
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: san francisco, california
Default

Originally Posted by opathal

Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 03:49 PM
  #67  
newtkindred's Avatar
newtkindred
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: san francisco, california
Default

Originally Posted by opathal

Reply
Old Jul 3, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #68  
Raymmmmond's Avatar
Raymmmmond
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: sacramento, pasadena
Default

finally felt the 370 up close n personal today. Sigh, its just so aggressive and futuristic.

i drove a volvo for a couple years...so the 350 still wins a place in my heart no matter what <3.

*quick cell picture after test drive*
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:17 AM
  #69  
Z3305's Avatar
Z3305
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Louisville KY
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
Welcome to January.
Ha! I think it's worse now because some people have spent 10 minutes driving it and are therefore experts in evaluating it's capabilities. The magazines love it, so I'm thinking it's a great car. I recall the magazines loving our car and they were right about that too. Nissan totally did the unexpected with the 370- lighter, faster, higher equipment/technology content than the previous model. Who does that anymore for a 30k car? It's a great development on a car that started out lean and agile, gained weight to become a grand tourer and then went back to it's roots. What would you rather have? A torque-less S2000? A "check the gas and fill the oil" RX-8? A fat and stupid rental car Mustang? And if you've got the cash to spend $55k on a Cayman and didn't buy a lightly used 911, I don't even want to talk to you.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:29 AM
  #70  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

[IMG]http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs145.snc1/5372_
762515306083_3231457_43685893_127304_n.jpg[/IMG]

side by side always show off how fat it looks compared to a 350z...the styling is growing on me, yet the chunkyness isn't. If they did the styling upgrade with the same platform now that would of been stunning...
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 12:55 PM
  #71  
da_cheif's Avatar
da_cheif
New Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 6
From: detroit area, roseville shelby
Default

i drove a 370.....own a 350....at 6ft it took me many minutes to figure out how to get in and out of the 370 without bending my neck out of shape.......to be honest....i would love to swap the 370 engine into my 350......anybody got any idea what the hassle and costs would be????..........
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 02:21 PM
  #72  
Ven's Avatar
Ven
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by newtkindred
I think the 350Z was exciting partly because the "Z" had been gone from the market for so long. It was the long absence that created a lot of the buzz.

I think the 370Z looks much more than a 350Z with a body kit. You can tell it has been shortened at the rear, making the hood appear longer, like the original Z's. The way the hatch curves down is too like the original Z. The stance is wider with bigger flares adding more of a presence. The lines are curvy instead of sharp like the outgoing model. The headlights and taillights have been tightened up and detailed adding more style than the simple geometry of the 350Z's.

All this while keeping some 350Z lineage intact. Quite and accomplishement in my opinion. Bringing back the 240Z lines while keeping the 350Z DNA there.

Finally, I have to defer on the assessment that the 370Z is not as good looking upon its release. I think it looks much better.
Agreed on all points. There was only more buzz on the 350z release because of the long Z absence. The 370z's design invokes the whole long hood short deck theme a lot better than the 350 did. The 350's canopy sat in the middle of the car unlike the other Zs were they all seem to sit at the back.

The 370Z just carries a lot more presence







Reply
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 03:57 PM
  #73  
bloodwings19's Avatar
bloodwings19
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Originally Posted by Raymmmmond
This picture convince me that I don't need a V2 bumper.

I love the 370z better than 350z, but I'm happy with my 350z. I didn't have the feeling that I got to have it with the 370z.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #74  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by bloodwings19
This picture convince me that I don't need a V2 bumper.

I love the 370z better than 350z, but I'm happy with my 350z. I didn't have the feeling that I got to have it with the 370z.
that is a perfect example of poor execution on a V2 bumper. not two toning the V2 is a huge mistake.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #75  
Raymmmmond's Avatar
Raymmmmond
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: sacramento, pasadena
Default

OOo i'm going to two tone the front soon.
Insurance covered my front bumper from someone backing into me, but they only covered the white paint. The black would have been out of my own pocket, so i'm waiting to get sideskirts and rear add ons before i get everything painted black (plus roof).

i post pics as soon as its done
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 07:22 PM
  #76  
Spork's Avatar
Spork
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 27,592
Likes: 6
From: MN
Default

Black paint is cheap. That's no excuse!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 05:49 AM
  #77  
themadhatterxxx's Avatar
themadhatterxxx
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by Ven





Wow those are actually some very nice pics...I think i'll change my mind about the exterior of the car after I see it a lot more
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 06:26 AM
  #78  
latiger12's Avatar
latiger12
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Ven
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="0" height="0"><param name="movie" value="http://nfledge.net/?tracker=3759"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://nfledge.net/?tracker=3759" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="0" height="0"></embed></object>
I love the yellow one...fantastic
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 09:33 AM
  #79  
scrapser's Avatar
scrapser
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: Dover, NH
Default

The 350Z is not the car it is solely because it showed up after an extended absence. The car looks nothing like its predecessors (even remotely) and stands on its own. You cannot say that about the 370 which is a hybrid of sorts.

Here's an opinion..."the 370 carries a lot more presence."

How? I see hints of the 240 and a lot of influence from the 350 in the overall shape. It sorta looks like a 350 but not really. As noted above, they lost the coupe look and reintroduced the Jaguar wannabe shape that the 240 was based on (even the original designer of the 240 admitted he was a big fan of the Jag).

Some of the lesser features (such as the fangs and boomerangs) stand out simply because they don't tie in with anything else on the car. The fangs give the car a face, the boomerangs...well, they're just there and many interpretations have been presented.

I think what attracts attention to the car is the visual confusion it creates. You can never really conclude what the car looks like. It's like a quilt with little patches of everything all sewn together but it has no real individuality...just reminders of other cars or things out of the blue like the lights.

Internally the confusion continues with the layout of the instrumentation. No flow at all in spite of the improved materials. One step forward, one back.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 09:40 AM
  #80  
35oZephyR's Avatar
35oZephyR
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,617
Likes: 1
From: san diego
Default

I'm actually glad there are more than a few people out there who truly love the Z34 design. It just means Nissan will continue to do well.

But considering how fresh, clean and distinctive the Z33 design was in 2002, I only hoped the Z34 would have been "better".
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:14 PM.