how much slower is roadster?
11-19-2003, 09:51 AM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Beautiful British Columbia
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 2003z
according to R&T's road test summary, its .1 faster to 60 than the track model they tested.
according to R&T's road test summary, its .1 faster to 60 than the track model they tested.
considering the increase in weight
11-19-2003, 10:07 AM
#7
Re: how much slower is roadster?
Originally posted by wutafobb
hi:
im new here! im just wondering how much slower roadster is comparet o coupe? any #s of comparison?
hi:
im new here! im just wondering how much slower roadster is comparet o coupe? any #s of comparison?
Trending Topics
11-19-2003, 12:40 PM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ---
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RedHerring2
The gearing is different on the roadster to make up for the added structural members. It is as fast or faster than the coupe.
The gearing is different on the roadster to make up for the added structural members. It is as fast or faster than the coupe.
11-19-2003, 07:39 PM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chopping the roof results in a decrease in torsional rigidity that must be overcome by supplementing the chassis underneath...i.e. the roof on the coupe is actually a "load-bearing" structure....
When you go topless you have to make the chassis stiffer underneath....even 911 cabriolets are heavier than coupes...
The Z has a big brace (heavy) underneath to make up for this loss...
Or at least that's my understanding...
And, Oh yeah....Rock On!
When you go topless you have to make the chassis stiffer underneath....even 911 cabriolets are heavier than coupes...
The Z has a big brace (heavy) underneath to make up for this loss...
Or at least that's my understanding...
And, Oh yeah....Rock On!
11-19-2003, 11:50 PM
#17
New Member
with all the bracing under the car and no metal roof on top, i would expect that the roadster has a lower center of gravity making it handle better. no data to back up my theory, just makes sense to me though.
11-20-2003, 01:28 PM
#19
Registered User
Coupe vs Roadster
The roadster is a completely different animal than the coupe. I traded in a 2003 touring coupe for this roadster. The difference is night and day.
Some differences could just be 2003 vs 2004 models.
Roadster shifts smoother, motor runs smoother. Suspension is smoother.
The gearing is different. The coupe is easy to redline and hit the rev limiter in first gear, I did it so many times, I was starting to worry that Nissan would find out through the computer and not warranty the motor. The roadster does not have this problem, you go further on first gear.
The seats are more comfortable. I know that they are suppost to be the same but, even my wife agrees there seems to be something about them that is different (maybe more padding).
My major dissapointment is the lack of VDC on the roadster. I loved this feature in my coupe. The butt end of my roadster looses traction quite easily.
I can feel a difference in the weight of the car, but it has a more solid feel.
These are the differences that I have noticed.
Some differences could just be 2003 vs 2004 models.
Roadster shifts smoother, motor runs smoother. Suspension is smoother.
The gearing is different. The coupe is easy to redline and hit the rev limiter in first gear, I did it so many times, I was starting to worry that Nissan would find out through the computer and not warranty the motor. The roadster does not have this problem, you go further on first gear.
The seats are more comfortable. I know that they are suppost to be the same but, even my wife agrees there seems to be something about them that is different (maybe more padding).
My major dissapointment is the lack of VDC on the roadster. I loved this feature in my coupe. The butt end of my roadster looses traction quite easily.
I can feel a difference in the weight of the car, but it has a more solid feel.
These are the differences that I have noticed.
11-21-2003, 04:39 AM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chattanooga TN
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since I have not owned a coupe, all I can say is that I love the convertible.
<complain>
One problem I have had is the top squeeking. It may be related to the top sealant that I used: RaggTopp. If you dab just a little wd40 on the drivers side end of the crossmember that runs just above your head it goes away for a week. I think it is when that end rubs against the top of the window frame beam that it rests against.
I was disappointed that I didn't get VDC with the 6spd. and the tire pressure sensors are missing. I changed wheels anyway.
</complain>
But I am very happy with the car in general. It's a blast so far.
By far the coolest car I have ever owned.
RH
<complain>
One problem I have had is the top squeeking. It may be related to the top sealant that I used: RaggTopp. If you dab just a little wd40 on the drivers side end of the crossmember that runs just above your head it goes away for a week. I think it is when that end rubs against the top of the window frame beam that it rests against.
I was disappointed that I didn't get VDC with the 6spd. and the tire pressure sensors are missing. I changed wheels anyway.
</complain>
But I am very happy with the car in general. It's a blast so far.
By far the coolest car I have ever owned.
RH