Notices
Cleaning & Detailing Washing, waxing, cleaning, caring.

Big Blue Towel Vs Absorber ??? Which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 05:58 PM
  #1  
chaknchngo's Avatar
chaknchngo
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: us
Default Big Blue Towel Vs Absorber ??? Which is better?

The reason why I ask this question is because I have a Super Black Z, and with this hot Cali weather we've been having I need something that will dry my car ASAP. Today I've tried my cousins absorber, and loved it. Now I am wondering how much better the Big Blue Towel is since I have read nothing but good comments on.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 06:09 PM
  #2  
MSOsr's Avatar
MSOsr
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
Default

You can dry with big blue without "wiping" your car and causing swirl marks on that beautiful black paint. You just spread the blue over the wet area, press, and remove. Very little friction needed against the car.

Blue will cover about 3/4 of one side of the hood at a time, so you can move quickly before the water spots.

You might want to read about the proper drying techniques on autopia.org.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 06:17 PM
  #3  
chaknchngo's Avatar
chaknchngo
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: us
Default

Thnx and will read.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 05:18 PM
  #4  
Kevin V's Avatar
Kevin V
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Default

Do you have a link to the "big blue" towel???
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 05:50 PM
  #5  
MannishBoy's Avatar
MannishBoy
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Default

Never used a Big Blue Towel, but I love my Absorber. Been using the same one for years.
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2003 | 09:30 PM
  #6  
s9am_me's Avatar
s9am_me
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
From: bay area - peninsula
Default

try these following sites...

www.pakshak.com
www.properautocare.com
www.premiumautocare.com

i have the little big blue towel from properautocare.com... and i have the humongous 25x36 from pakshak.com... both are pretty much the same quality. I'd go for the pakshak since its cheaper.. free shipping and they have great customer service

Last edited by s9am_me; Aug 5, 2003 at 09:32 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 03:29 PM
  #7  
buzzdsm's Avatar
buzzdsm
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default

I have the waffle one from Pakshak and it's nice but I still prefer the absorber. I would however recommend the ultra MF towels that they have for polish removal.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 08:55 PM
  #8  
Scafremon's Avatar
Scafremon
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

I used to use an Absorber on my Z and previous cars, but recently switched to the waffle-weave drying towel from pakshak. Having done so, I can say I will never go back to the Absorber.

The Absorber definetly has it's absorbant quality, but it was it's 'grip' on the Z that made me want to get something else. Like MSOsr alluded to, the Absorber has the potential to create a lot of friction on the car. It grips the car so strongly that if some particle was missed during the wash, or came between your absorber and the car during drying, you could be dragging that particle over your finish very forcefully.

When you wash your car you have the benifit of a liquid wash to act as a lubricant to protect your finish while you drag your wash mit over the finish. This is the sole purpose of using a soap during the wash (in my opinion). Same for using a Quick Detail spray - it is a lubricant. But when drying your car, there is just your drying means and water.

It makes sense to me to use something soft and absorbant (and even sacrifice some absorbing qualities) to achieve a safe drying of the car.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 07:34 AM
  #9  
vincenzobar's Avatar
vincenzobar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Germantown, MD
Default

I have the super absorber, but i have a white car!!!! Not a big deal to me!
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 11:21 AM
  #10  
ChadO's Avatar
ChadO
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Another vote for the BBT. I have a couple of absorbers, but I too was really nervous about the friction created by dragging it across the surface. I simply place the BBT over the car, press, and and lift. I dry first with the water blade so the BBT is just to pick up the remnants.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 02:28 PM
  #11  
buzzdsm's Avatar
buzzdsm
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default

Originally posted by ChadO
Another vote for the BBT. I have a couple of absorbers, but I too was really nervous about the friction created by dragging it across the surface. I simply place the BBT over the car, press, and and lift. I dry first with the water blade so the BBT is just to pick up the remnants.

I think if you're using both the blade and the BBT it would be a good combo but if you're only using the BBT it just get'stoo wet by the end. You can't ring it out like the absorber.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 08:28 PM
  #12  
MannishBoy's Avatar
MannishBoy
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Default

Originally posted by ChadO
Another vote for the BBT. I have a couple of absorbers, but I too was really nervous about the friction created by dragging it across the surface. I simply place the BBT over the car, press, and and lift. I dry first with the water blade so the BBT is just to pick up the remnants.
That seems contradictory to me in logic. You don't like the absorber because of potential friction, but use the blade?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2003 | 08:58 PM
  #13  
ChadO's Avatar
ChadO
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally posted by MannishBoy
That seems contradictory to me in logic. You don't like the absorber because of potential friction, but use the blade?
The absorber really grips the surface of my paint, almost to the point where it's difficult to pull it across. The increased surface area of the absorber also increases the possibility of creating swirl marks by capturing fragments underneath. It seems to me that it would be a lot harder to do this with the blade; however, the possibility still isn't entirely removed. I don't exactly like the sound the blade makes as it goes across my paint either
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2003 | 03:46 AM
  #14  
MannishBoy's Avatar
MannishBoy
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Default

Originally posted by ChadO
The absorber really grips the surface of my paint, almost to the point where it's difficult to pull it across. The increased surface area of the absorber also increases the possibility of creating swirl marks by capturing fragments underneath. It seems to me that it would be a lot harder to do this with the blade; however, the possibility still isn't entirely removed. I don't exactly like the sound the blade makes as it goes across my paint either
I would think of it this way. In making bulldozers, do they stick a large piece of stuff out in front of a tractor, or do they stick a straight piece of metal out front and push it?




Not sure one is better than the other, but to me, there is less risk with the absorber than a straight blade that has no areas for dirt to hide in.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2003 | 08:27 AM
  #15  
shaneotool's Avatar
shaneotool
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Default

I have the absorber and love it. I don't drag it across the paint though like some others mentioned. I just pat the car with it. I would never drag the absorber - it seems like that would scratch the paint for sure.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #16  
buzzdsm's Avatar
buzzdsm
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default

I don't get this issue with dragging it across the paint? When I clean the Z I clean it good enough where there is nothing on the paint to scrape. If the area could still be dirty (underneath) then I don't use it there but I think that's the case with any rag. I've used the absorber for a long time and have never had an issue and have never heard of anyone having an issue.

No matter what product you have there is always someone that says they have something better. All I know is the Absorber does everything I need it to do. It dries faster then anything available and it makes the Z shine.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2003 | 12:03 PM
  #17  
ChadO's Avatar
ChadO
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Originally posted by MannishBoy
I would think of it this way. In making bulldozers, do they stick a large piece of stuff out in front of a tractor, or do they stick a straight piece of metal out front and push it?




Not sure one is better than the other, but to me, there is less risk with the absorber than a straight blade that has no areas for dirt to hide in.
I see what you're saying, but then I'd have to say that the blade would simply move the particles of dirt, not press them against the surface of the car. There's now way the dirt particles could get caught underneath the blade to cause it to scratch. The blade has that little lip on it, and when dragged it takes the water, and dirt, with it. Or so I'd think...

Anyway, both methods are fine. I think the 100% sure way of removing water without introducing micromarring of any kind would be to simply blot with something like the Big Blue Towel.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jambo016
New Owners
27
Sep 16, 2016 01:08 PM
Dark Knight
Wheels Tires
7
Nov 11, 2015 08:40 PM
kyin
New Owners
12
Oct 15, 2015 05:54 AM
MicVelo
NorCal Marketplace
9
Oct 4, 2015 07:55 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 PM.