Notices
Drag NHRA, IDRC, IHRA, NDRA

I own a 10 second Z!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:15 AM
  #81  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
ok so if my car puts down 600 on a dyno jet youll shut the fack up? Or youll find something else to call em out on?
I posted Dyno Dynamics UNCORRECTED numbers of 580whp in the past..I admit I am curious to see howe accurate the correction factor on the DD is when compared to actual dyno jet numbers.But you are really acting like a spoiled little kid that will call me out no matter what I post..So the point is mute..
Bottom line, dyno jet comming soon.So you can compare till your heart is content...
No-670whp to 600whp is a HUGE difference. Wouldnt you think if your not 100% sure of how well that correction is that you wouldnt post the inflated numbers? I mean thats what most honest people would do. I think you guys got excited and jumped the gun a little. Id be happy if you did 640+whp on a dynojet, and wouldnt call you out at all. We know your car is fast judging by the traps, but in the end you look bad for 2 reasons.

1. Your honestly no where near 673whp on a dynojet
2. Your trap is no where near what a 650+whp car will do down the 1/4, in the end your mph truly gave you in. After your correction, I doubt Id trust any more dyno numbers from you guys-which is a shame, but thats just my opinion which means nothing Who knows how many people you dissapointed and agree with me
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:19 AM
  #82  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Why when I point the finger at you do you turn back and ask me to point it elsewhere? Your missing the point so Ill stop with this back and forth BS, I never doubted your car being fast. All I doubted-along with many of the others you mentioned (although not all) were your dyno numbers. Sharif has stepped up and decided to not use any more correction factors. The others well those have been in other posts. Its unfortunate many share my views but none will speak up and look like "an a$$"...

BTW-dont be stupid and judge somebody for what they "havent" done, judge me by what I have done. Which has always been pretty damn honest posting, not bull$hitted people with dyno numbers, not made 10 or 11 sec car claims and not done it, and most importantly I havent gotten my panties in a bunch when asked something legit. Have a nice day

Last edited by Alberto; Jul 25, 2006 at 09:24 AM.
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:20 AM
  #83  
JisNis's Avatar
JisNis
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
The two black strips of rubber I can leave in 3rd gear for 100 feet..thats how...When your at that level then you can test me.Until then you should show some respect, cause your talking a whole lot o chit for a guy who has note even hit the 400whp mark..lol
Ouch......
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:24 AM
  #84  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
No-670whp to 600whp is a HUGE difference. Wouldnt you think if your not 100% sure of how well that correction is that you wouldnt post the inflated numbers? I mean thats what most honest people would do. I think you guys got excited and jumped the gun a little. Id be happy if you did 640+whp on a dynojet, and wouldnt call you out at all. We know your car is fast judging by the traps, but in the end you look bad for 2 reasons.

1. Your honestly no where near 673whp on a dynojet
2. Your trap is no where near what a 650+whp car will do down the 1/4, in the end your mph truly gave you in. After your correction, I doubt Id trust any more dyno numbers from you guys-which is a shame, but thats just my opinion which means nothing Who knows how many people you dissapointed and agree with me

Ok, whatever you say man...you have built and tuned how many 350z again?? All of a sudden, some kid with money to pay Altered Atmospheres to turbo his car, then rebuild it after it was blown up, is telling ME how much HP my car is making and what my traps should or should not be..I honestly could not give a crap less what credibility you THINK I have or my dyno numbers..Cause FYI your car was tuned in 3rd gear at altered cause their dyno cant go over 100mph..lol So maybe you almighty Dyno Jet numbers you cliam are a bit skewed also...My runs were all in 5th gear to 145 mph, thats another reason your motor is in tiny pieces and mine is not..There is not enought load on your motor to properly tune in 3rd gear, you just dont get it do you??
Your opinion is worth nothing to me, and your obvious attempt to discredit me is I am sure for underlying reasons...You honestly are getting under my skin, but Im going to just let it go and count to 10..Cause this whole thread means nothing at this point..
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:24 AM
  #85  
Kirkster's Avatar
Kirkster
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
From: Severn, ProMD
Default

Ok time for you two to go on Pinks...
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:25 AM
  #86  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by JisNis
Ouch......
Ouch that really hurt me You can keep giving MRC the reach around now-gotta love nuthuggers with nothing to contribute
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:26 AM
  #87  
zoeybadm's Avatar
zoeybadm
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Fair Oaks, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
After reading you and Brian go back and forth in the street section everybody seems to insult you or come off wrong

I dont always post with tact, but Im not an a$$. All i want is shops/people to be honest in what they do. Again, I like MRC, I like the times Jason runs, how their tune has kept his motor in 1 piece. I do not believe 673whp @ only 12psi. Its nothing personal against MRC, if anybody had posted that I would have offered what Im doing here, which is a free dyno to prove me wrong and them right. What is so horrible about TAKING HIIM UP ON HIS OFFER?? Damn a lot of you guys need to change your tampons....
In all honesty I was just making commentary on the way you are coming off in this thread. I take BriGuy with a grain of salt......I have come across his personality type a thousand times before and I find them amusing....

I said you were coming off looking like an a$$....nowhere did I say you were an a$$ because I cannot make that comment. I do not know you personally or at outside of this board.

Presentation is key when making comments on an internet board.......
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #88  
JisNis's Avatar
JisNis
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Ouch that really hurt me You can keep giving MRC the reach around now-gotta love nuthuggers with nothing to contribute
Now its time for you to change ur tampon...
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #89  
zoeybadm's Avatar
zoeybadm
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Fair Oaks, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Ouch that really hurt me You can keep giving MRC the reach around now-gotta love nuthuggers with nothing to contribute
It is so weird that you and BriGuy always seem to make nuthugging comments. You guys seem to be fascinated by homosexual activities.

What exactly are you contributing by offering a free dyno? I am not sure calling someone out contributes anything other than a lame attempt to start chit with someone else.....just sayin
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:31 AM
  #90  
JisNis's Avatar
JisNis
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by zoeybadm
What exactly are you contributing by offering a free dyno? I am not sure calling someone out contributes anything other than a lame attempt to start chit with someone else.....just sayin
+1. Im kinda amused at his lame attempt to discredit people, its kinda funny to me.
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:32 AM
  #91  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by MRC Motorsports
Ok, whatever you say man...you have built and tuned how many 350z again?? All of a sudden, some kid with money to pay Altered Atmospheres to turbo his car, then rebuild it after it was blown up, is telling ME how much HP my car is making and what my traps should or should not be..I honestly could not give a crap less what credibility you THINK I have or my dyno numbers..Cause FYI your car was tuned in 3rd gear at altered cause their dyno cant go over 100mph..lol So maybe you almighty Dyno Jet numbers you cliam are a bit skewed also...My runs were all in 5th gear to 145 mph, thats another reason your motor is in tiny pieces and mine is not..There is not enought load on your motor to properly tune in 3rd gear, you just dont get it do you??
Your opinion is worth nothing to me, and your obvious attempt to discredit me is I am sure for underlying reasons...You honestly are getting under my skin, but Im going to just let it go and count to 10..Cause this whole thread means nothing at this point..
AAM didnt turbo my Z-I installed the kit, everything ever put on this car but the fuel system. Im not some newb with a turbo Z, or a newb to the dragstrip. While most will suck your internet **** and not doubt you, I will not. My final numbers come from 5th gear the true 1:1 not 3rd, and tuning is done in 4th whats this have to do with anything again?
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:33 AM
  #92  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Your missing the point so Ill stop with this back and forth BS, I never doubted your car being fast.
Then what is your point? You basically telling me my car is NOT fast and Im BSing...

Originally Posted by Alberto
All I doubted-along with many of the others you mentioned (although not all) were your dyno numbers. Sharif has stepped up and decided to not use any more correction factors.
Then why is he still using his 622 whp CORRECTED numbers?Where his Dyno Jet??Why arent you flaming him??
Originally Posted by Alberto
BTW-dont be stupid and judge somebody for what they "havent" done, judge me by what I have done.
Lets just get this strait..you have done NOTHING..All you did was drive your car to an 11.8..you did not build it, you did not tune it..all you did was pay for it.This gives you some godlike credibility cause you know how to drive a car fast?? I dont think so.
Originally Posted by Alberto
Which has always been pretty damn honest posting, not bull$hitted people with dyno numbers, not made 10 or 11 sec car claims and not done it, and most importantly I havent gotten my panties in a bunch when asked something legit. Have a nice day
Ok, so you ran an 11.99999999 second pass, and now your the resident drag racing consultant right? You know all the HP to weight ratios of everyones cars and what their car should be trapping and running right..
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:33 AM
  #93  
JisNis's Avatar
JisNis
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Im not some newb with a turbo Z, or a newb to the dragstrip.
Ur not? Then why is ur motor blown?
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:35 AM
  #94  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by JisNis
Ur not? Then why is ur motor blown?
ouch....
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #95  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Your right I run $hit a$$ 1/4 times, dont know anything about drag racing, or dynos Bottom line AGAIN-I dont doubt your car is fast, I never said it wasnt. I dont doubt its 500+whp, I dont think its slow. All I wanted was for you to follow up on your word as a man, as a shop, as a Vendor of this forum on what you had originally posted-which was that you would dyno on anybody's dyno to back up your claims. When you had 50 nuthuggers going crazy over the 673whp numbers, you were the big man. When this thread had basically died and gotten down to me and you, you act like Im a d!ck and lash out when I asked if you wanted a free dyno. Funny as the backup starts arriving your posting back more and more....
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:40 AM
  #96  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
No-670whp to 600whp is a HUGE difference. Wouldnt you think if your not 100% sure of how well that correction is that you wouldnt post the inflated numbers? I mean thats what most honest people would do. I think you guys got excited and jumped the gun a little. Id be happy if you did 640+whp on a dynojet, and wouldnt call you out at all. We know your car is fast judging by the traps, but in the end you look bad for 2 reasons.

1. Your honestly no where near 673whp on a dynojet
2. Your trap is no where near what a 650+whp car will do down the 1/4, in the end your mph truly gave you in. After your correction, I doubt Id trust any more dyno numbers from you guys-which is a shame, but thats just my opinion which means nothing Who knows how many people you dissapointed and agree with me
10% correction is what the Dyno Dynamics need to simulate Dyno Jet numbers, actually its 1.13 correction factor to equal a Dyno Jet similar number.So 670-to 600 depicts a 11 % loss or in that area..I dont look bad, you look bad and you make your sponsors in your signature look bad..
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:40 AM
  #97  
superchargedg's Avatar
superchargedg
Damn Noobs
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,274
Likes: 2
From: timonium,md.
Default

Originally Posted by JisNis
Ur not? Then why is ur motor blown?
no hes not a newb and the motor blowing **** can happen to any car.he ran his car hard and did all the proper prcautions that are out there.it just shows that a properly set up motor with all the safety you can buy it can still blow.
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #98  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
AAM didnt turbo my Z-I installed the kit, everything ever put on this car but the fuel system.
thats odd, usually most self installers dont put a performance shops website address in PINK in their signatures...
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #99  
superchargedg's Avatar
superchargedg
Damn Noobs
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,274
Likes: 2
From: timonium,md.
Default

Originally Posted by JisNis
Ur not? Then why is ur motor blown?
and your lame *** point is......
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #100  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Dyno Jet numbers comming either tonight or tommorow, depending on my scedule..Then the witchhunt to have every other shop with a 600hp dyno on a dyno dynamics or mustang or dyna pack, shall begin...
If im backing up my dyno with a dyno jet then so should eveyone else.You will see all the big hp numbers fall especially VRT's numbers..

Last edited by Julian@MRC; Jul 25, 2006 at 09:48 AM.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 PM.