Got Dyno'd Today....
09-07-2006, 02:32 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYC/LI
Posts: 3,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got Dyno'd Today....
Before I put on my AAM angled spacer, I did a before/after dyno at Performance Motorsports...I have an '06 Base 6-speed. Here are the results:
----------------------------------------------
Mods:
Injen SES
Injen CAI
Dyno'd at 265 rwhp/233 torque, uncorrected.
Corrected at - 296 rwhp/260 torque
----------------------------------------------
Mods:
Injen SES
Injen CAI
AAM Angled Spacer
Dyno'd at 270 rwhp/233 torque, uncorrected.
Corrected at - 301 rwhp/ 260 torque
-----------------------------------------------
Is it just me, or does this sound too high?
----------------------------------------------
Mods:
Injen SES
Injen CAI
Dyno'd at 265 rwhp/233 torque, uncorrected.
Corrected at - 296 rwhp/260 torque
----------------------------------------------
Mods:
Injen SES
Injen CAI
AAM Angled Spacer
Dyno'd at 270 rwhp/233 torque, uncorrected.
Corrected at - 301 rwhp/ 260 torque
-----------------------------------------------
Is it just me, or does this sound too high?
09-07-2006, 02:35 PM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mid117
Before I put on my AAM angled spacer, I did a before/after dyno at Performance Motorsports...I have an '06 Base 6-speed. Here are the results:
----------------------------------------------
Mods:
Injen SES
Injen CAI
Dyno'd at 265 rwhp/233 torque, uncorrected.
Corrected at - 296 rwhp/260 torque
----------------------------------------------
Mods:
Injen SES
Injen CAI
AAM Angled Spacer
Dyno'd at 270 rwhp/233 torque, uncorrected.
Corrected at - 301 rwhp/ 260 torque
-----------------------------------------------
Is it just me, or does this sound too high?
----------------------------------------------
Mods:
Injen SES
Injen CAI
Dyno'd at 265 rwhp/233 torque, uncorrected.
Corrected at - 296 rwhp/260 torque
----------------------------------------------
Mods:
Injen SES
Injen CAI
AAM Angled Spacer
Dyno'd at 270 rwhp/233 torque, uncorrected.
Corrected at - 301 rwhp/ 260 torque
-----------------------------------------------
Is it just me, or does this sound too high?
09-07-2006, 02:56 PM
#4
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Mid117
yeah I thought so...it was on a mustang dyno if that makes a difference....
09-07-2006, 04:26 PM
#7
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYC/LI
Posts: 3,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JonsilvZ
They claim the spacer puts 10whp or more? I had mine dynoed a few yrs ago at the same shop,see sig.. Thats why my Z is a close race with yours Mid.
Are you going to OBI sunday? I'll be there, and I'll show you the graphs
Trending Topics
09-07-2006, 09:28 PM
#9
New Member
iTrader: (6)
Mustang dynos are usually a little lower than Dynojets because they're more accurate when operated correctly. Unfortunately, Mustang dynos are very easy to operate incorrectly. The numbers are very sensitive to operator input.
09-08-2006, 06:01 AM
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO Corrected numbers are usually inflated. They are meant to tell you what in a perfect, ideal situation what your car would be making. I was shocked to see 270 myself but I will not say it isn't possible. Even when I was at other shops using DynoJets I have seen stock Z's range anywhere from 220-264rwhp in the same day. Many factors come into play when dynoing, specifically which map the ecu was running. 270 with bolt-ons does seem high but not unrealistic. Congrats on the numbers and it was great seeing you yesterday.
09-08-2006, 09:33 AM
#12
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mustangs usually are lower. the thing you have to remember about Mustang dynos is they load the rollers based on the vehicle weight the operator enters. If the operator enters a weight that is far too low the car will dyno higher. If the weight is too high it will drop the numbers. I actually tested this theory on a local Mustang dyno years ago. I had a Sentra SE-R at the time with a curb weight of 2750. At that weight the car made ~145 WHP. With the weight entered as 2000 lbs the car made 180 WHP
09-08-2006, 10:04 AM
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Mustangs usually are lower. the thing you have to remember about Mustang dynos is they load the rollers based on the vehicle weight the operator enters. If the operator enters a weight that is far too low the car will dyno higher. If the weight is too high it will drop the numbers. I actually tested this theory on a local Mustang dyno years ago. I had a Sentra SE-R at the time with a curb weight of 2750. At that weight the car made ~145 WHP. With the weight entered as 2000 lbs the car made 180 WHP
09-08-2006, 10:52 AM
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYC/LI
Posts: 3,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Mustangs usually are lower. the thing you have to remember about Mustang dynos is they load the rollers based on the vehicle weight the operator enters. If the operator enters a weight that is far too low the car will dyno higher. If the weight is too high it will drop the numbers. I actually tested this theory on a local Mustang dyno years ago. I had a Sentra SE-R at the time with a curb weight of 2750. At that weight the car made ~145 WHP. With the weight entered as 2000 lbs the car made 180 WHP
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seagrasser
Zs & Gs For Sale
6
10-11-2015 03:27 PM