UR Pulleys.....
Originally Posted by gothchick
Who the heck are you? You show up to this forum with 6 posts all posted in this thread claiming to be from Unorthodox... Yeah right... Maybe a Mod could do an IP check...
Just for the record. The picture of the damaged pulley was not a UR Pulley. 3rd post down by Trijicon on page 4 of this thread:
http://www.az350z.com/forum/viewtopi...ulley&start=45
http://www.az350z.com/forum/viewtopi...t=2036&start=0
http://www.az350z.com/forum/viewtopi...ulley&start=45
http://www.az350z.com/forum/viewtopi...t=2036&start=0
Last edited by 03BlkSETE; May 23, 2007 at 05:20 AM.
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
And what would an IP check accomplish? Wow... Let me see... if I do an IP check on myself, I find that I'm homed to Memphis, but I actually live in Birmingham.
Last edited by gothchick; May 22, 2007 at 08:03 PM.
Originally Posted by 03BlkSETE
Just for the record. The picture of the damaged pulley was not a UR Pulley. 3rd post down by Trijicon on page for of this thread:
http://www.az350z.com/forum/viewtopi...ulley&start=45
http://www.az350z.com/forum/viewtopi...t=2036&start=0
http://www.az350z.com/forum/viewtopi...ulley&start=45
http://www.az350z.com/forum/viewtopi...t=2036&start=0
thank you - I was wondering when someone would point that out
Originally Posted by PM-Performance
Maybe the explanation might sound odd, but he is on the right track. I cannot explain it fully how it was explained to me, but it makes a ton of sense and trying from stock to lightweight in some other cars, it proved to be true.
As for the Z, it wasnt really related, but kind of similar topic while on lightweight pullies. Sorry I got OT a bit.
As for the Z, it wasnt really related, but kind of similar topic while on lightweight pullies. Sorry I got OT a bit.
Here is a great article that highlights the advantages and disadvantages of a lightended flywheel (12lbs vs the 26lb dual mass stocker) on a 95 M3.
http://www.europeancarweb.com/projec...utch_flywheel/
But, another noticeable difference was the loss of some low-end torque. The car seemed to rev more quickly but not until higher up in the rev range. Off the line, the car wouldn't pull like it used to when I dumped the clutch at 3500 rpm. The inertia generated from the heavier stock flywheel couldn't be reproduced with this lightweight unit for an out-of-the-hole launch. But, once the revs climbed, the needle was noticeably quicker, at least in the first few gears.
There's a rule of thumb recited by many M3 owners: The acceleration gains from a lightweight flywheel are equivalent to the acceleration gains an M3 will get from a 250 to 350-lb vehicular weight reduction in 1st gear, 100 lb in second and minimal gains in acceleration from third gear on up.
So, which would you choose--an upgrade that makes your car quicker above or below 5500 rpm? Before we answer this, let's take a look at second gear. Surprisingly, up until 4700 rpm, the lightened flywheel maintained torque with only a maximum loss of 2.4 lb-ft and 1.9 bhp at 4000 rpm to the stock flywheel. After 4700 rpm, the flywheel showed its advantage with a constant gain to redline, revealing a maximum gain of 4.4 lb-ft of torque at 5500 rpm and 4.7 bhp at 6500 rpm. Third gear runs were tested but yielded no significant gains or losses.
Second, you will lose some low-end torque--especially off the line--as our dyno charts have shown. And last, the boys in Munich chose a heavier, dual-mass flywheel also to make it a bit easier to drive smoothly around town.
Consider in round one (first gear) that we have somewhat of a tie, assuming we want both low- and high-end torque--we win some and we lose some. But, that 10.8-bhp gain at 6700 rpm does sound appealing,
Originally Posted by gothchick
Internet 101. An IP check goes back to the ISP that's being used, that in turn can pull a company name (if it is a company account), user name, and address. All public info if you have the IP address. Sort of like skip-tracing, but much easier. 

Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
I understand the mechanics behind IP. But an IP check is worthless if his IP comes from a DHCP pool, which is likely the case. Like I said in my previous post, when I was posting from home, a reverse IP lookup suggested I was posting from Memphis, when in fact I was living in Birmingham. An IP check would not prove his identity.
yeah because someone is going to take the time to impersonate the owner of Unorthodox...
Having known Shawn for 10 years now, I can personally vouch for it being him who posted
Having known Shawn for 10 years now, I can personally vouch for it being him who posted
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
yeah because someone is going to take the time to impersonate the owner of Unorthodox...
Having known Shawn for 10 years now, I can personally vouch for it being him who posted
Having known Shawn for 10 years now, I can personally vouch for it being him who posted
No one from UR is posting on here, you can rest assure from that....
Back to discussion -
I find it interesting that someone is claiming that by having a lightened flywheel there is no power gain from 1st and 2nd gear and nothing from 3rd and 4th...
Unless I'm reading it incorrectly...
I would agree that though a power gain would be nill in any gear, the mere fact that you can now spin the crank faster due to less weight on it and less resistance against it, you in return get more power faster...for what it's worth I think a lightened flywheel is always a good idea unless the crank is balanced with the flywheel on it, which is highly doubtful....
Originally Posted by spratocaster
Well technically the ISP should have logs of who was assigned a given IP address at a given time. Though getting that information from them without a warrant might be difficult (privacy and such). If you are really concerned that the guy is not who he says he is (though I see no reason for him to lie) then call UR and ask for him.
Originally Posted by wperdigon
No one from UR is posting on here, you can rest assure from that....
Back to discussion -
..
Back to discussion -
..
Shawn posted here because I called him yesterday and mentioned the thread - don't believe me? Call him yourself and ask him
631.586.9525
Originally Posted by wperdigon
I find it interesting that someone is claiming that by having a lightened flywheel there is no power gain from 1st and 2nd gear and nothing from 3rd and 4th...
Unless I'm reading it incorrectly...
I would agree that though a power gain would be nill in any gear, the mere fact that you can now spin the crank faster due to less weight on it and less resistance against it, you in return get more power faster...for what it's worth I think a lightened flywheel is always a good idea unless the crank is balanced with the flywheel on it, which is highly doubtful....
Unless I'm reading it incorrectly...
I would agree that though a power gain would be nill in any gear, the mere fact that you can now spin the crank faster due to less weight on it and less resistance against it, you in return get more power faster...for what it's worth I think a lightened flywheel is always a good idea unless the crank is balanced with the flywheel on it, which is highly doubtful....
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
you are completely, utterly, absolutely wrong
Shawn posted here because I called him yesterday and mentioned the thread - don't believe me? Call him yourself and ask him
631.586.9525
Shawn posted here because I called him yesterday and mentioned the thread - don't believe me? Call him yourself and ask him
631.586.9525
why would I call him? I have Brian's number and if I needed to speak with anyone from U/R I would talk with the Marketing guy as we know each other...
also, somewhat abrasive don't you think, just calling out a potential customer and telling them they are..how you say...
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
you are completely, utterly, absolutely wrong
Originally Posted by Dave B
Moment of inertia and gear multiplication. That is why there is no measured power gain in the higher gears. There is an elaborate physics equation you can use to calculate it which takes into consideration the mass and size of the object (flywheel/pulley) and gear ratios for each gear. Apparantly this is equation and physics fact is way above Shawn's head at UR because he still preaches that the car will be faster in the 1/4 mile with his product.
That's interesting... I have a JWT flywheel and I certainly did notice a tenth faster consistantly at the track, but nothing to the point that I wouldn't sit here and preach it's the end of all being....
Last edited by wperdigon; May 23, 2007 at 10:34 AM.
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
I agree. That's why I questioned the use of an IP check in the first place. I really didn't mean to derail this thread so far, but an IP check would be completely useless. That's all I was pointing out to gothchick.
Last edited by gothchick; May 23, 2007 at 10:36 AM.
Originally Posted by gothchick
What's so useless about tracing a company name, user name, and address from any given IP? It's public info. The ISP WILL give it to anyone who asks. I've done it. It's nowhere near as useless as the reverse lookup Trey is pointing out.
Originally Posted by gothchick
Please go back to Internet 101, Trey.
And tell me something: how many of these so-called IP checks have you performed? How many requests to ISP's have you sent? How many have responded? Giving away IP addresses of customers without a court order, or even the threat of a court order, is a big privacy issue, and something unlikely to be done by an ISP lightly.
I think you may need to revisit Internet 101, as you call it. Domain registrations are public information, user/ip mappings are not.
Originally Posted by wperdigon
why would I call him? I have Brian's number and if I needed to speak with anyone from U/R I would talk with the Marketing guy as we know each other...
also, somewhat abrasive don't you think, just calling out a potential customer and telling them they are..how you say...
not something a little more pc like, i disagree with you.. or something along those lines? yikes, don't get all up in defense mode
also, somewhat abrasive don't you think, just calling out a potential customer and telling them they are..how you say...
not something a little more pc like, i disagree with you.. or something along those lines? yikes, don't get all up in defense mode
Again, I know it was he who posted because I am the one who called and spoke with Shawn yesterday, and suggested he participate in the thread. He obliged by replying to this thread yesterday afternoon.
If you, or anyone else is that overwhelmingly concerned that it somehow was someone else pretending to be Shawn, again, call him and ask him yourselves
Last edited by Z1 Performance; May 23, 2007 at 04:06 PM.
Another one on lightweight pullies. My God this is a dead horse, and I can't believe Z1 got sucked into yet another argument about this.
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/215297-dampners-and-reducing-harmonics.html
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/213325-crank-pully.html
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/122448-fluidampr.html
I don't like them, and I think for sustained rpm use, like road racing your daily driver, they are stupid. There are SAE papers to buy and download if you want to see the math. However, most street driven vehicles won't see any extended wear that will come about before some other critical piece fails in the engine, and race engine's get rebuilt every weekend, or at least every season, anyways. The posts above cover my feelings in detail and every other opinion a person could have on this. I'm just amazed at how this mod maybe frees up 2-3 hp but is the most controversial thing on this forum after the Dreamwerkes supercharger.
Will
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/215297-dampners-and-reducing-harmonics.html
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/213325-crank-pully.html
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/122448-fluidampr.html
I don't like them, and I think for sustained rpm use, like road racing your daily driver, they are stupid. There are SAE papers to buy and download if you want to see the math. However, most street driven vehicles won't see any extended wear that will come about before some other critical piece fails in the engine, and race engine's get rebuilt every weekend, or at least every season, anyways. The posts above cover my feelings in detail and every other opinion a person could have on this. I'm just amazed at how this mod maybe frees up 2-3 hp but is the most controversial thing on this forum after the Dreamwerkes supercharger.
Will
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
Have you considered that the guy might not be posting from his business? Possibly from home, or an airport, or a Starbucks hotspot? ing.
The only reliable way to mask an IP is by using a Proxy server to bounce around to different country's before popping back to your own locale. And those tend to be s-l-o-w as ****.
Didn't you mention you've been an IT professional for years & years? You should know this stuff then. You're not as Anonymous online as you think.
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
And tell me something: how many of these so-called IP checks have you performed? .
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
How many requests to ISP's have you sent? .
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
How many have responded? .
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
Giving away IP addresses of customers without a court order, or even the threat of a court order, is a big privacy issue, and something unlikely to be done by an ISP lightly.
Here - give me ANY valid IP that YOU used to log to the Internet (non-proxied, scrubbed, or spoofed) and I'll mail you an Internet 101 manual. And don't worry, I'm too busy with my own life to stalk someone else's. Hehehee! :-)
Last edited by gothchick; May 25, 2007 at 05:42 AM.
Originally Posted by Resolute


