Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Na 310 Rwhp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 12:32 AM
  #1  
prisoner's Avatar
prisoner
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
Default Na 300 Rwhp?

Ok, I have 3 questions.
What would be the easiest way to get around 300rwhp with out nitrous or FI?
Can you do it with just bolt-ons and a chip or do you need heads/cams?
Is it possible to do it for less money that a twin turbo?

I just want something that will keep up with a C5. I don't need to blow it out of the water or anything. Any input would be great.

Last edited by prisoner; Jun 23, 2003 at 12:41 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 05:36 AM
  #2  
racingdynamcs's Avatar
racingdynamcs
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Closter, NJ
Default

the cheapest way to do that will be a turbo or SC...because i can see you getting 340-350 HP to the crank with NA...thats about it
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 07:48 AM
  #3  
TheBigShow's Avatar
TheBigShow
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: South Central PA
Default

that's pretty much impossible right now. the easiest way to get there would b a 75 shot. i'm just doin the bolton thing for now, and probly i'll end up doin a vortech. the only thing i'd lose would b my intake, but who would really care about that .
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 07:54 AM
  #4  
TheFuture's Avatar
TheFuture
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default Re: Na 300 Rwhp?

Originally posted by prisoner
Ok, I have 3 questions.
What would be the easiest way to get around 300rwhp with out nitrous or FI?
Can you do it with just bolt-ons and a chip or do you need heads/cams?
Is it possible to do it for less money that a twin turbo?

I just want something that will keep up with a C5. I don't need to blow it out of the water or anything. Any input would be great.
Headers, Intake, hi flow cats or no cats, low restriction muffler,
ported heads and lopey cams

Will put you over 300rwhp depending on how aggressive the cams are

With a really aggressive set of cams, and the rest of the mods I listed, you could see 320rwhp - 350 rwhp!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 08:49 AM
  #5  
JZC's Avatar
JZC
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: Strongbadia
Default

Pulleys, Flywheel, and exhaust as well.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 11:20 AM
  #6  
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 1
From: jacksonville, FL
Default

Ive seen dyoes of guys with just an intake putting down about 252 rwhp, it wont be hard to pick up 60 hp with some basic boltons. Ive gfot faith that once i get my exhaust, headers, hi-flow cats, flywheel, and intake manifold ill be putting down about 300 rwhp...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 11:31 AM
  #7  
f r e z N Y's Avatar
f r e z N Y
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Default

Originally posted by PoWeRtRiP
Ive seen dyoes of guys with just an intake putting down about 252 rwhp, it wont be hard to pick up 60 hp with some basic boltons. Ive gfot faith that once i get my exhaust, headers, hi-flow cats, flywheel, and intake manifold ill be putting down about 300 rwhp...
probably not unless you run an ECU upgrade too.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 12:54 PM
  #8  
infidsg35's Avatar
infidsg35
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

I would have to say that 300 RWH is not that hard.. They are putting what 240ish out so that is 50 - 60ish HP that heeds to be made. With Headers, high flow cats out to a true duel exhaust with X pipe will get you about 25 - 30 HP Then pullys have seen about 7HP gains. Grounding kit gets you about 3 HP.. Flywheel will be about 4 HP.. 100% synthetic oil has been known for its 1 - 3 HP gains but who knows on that lil.. Intake will get you about 5 HP.. ECU that will give about 7HP and make the comp dumb so it will not retard itself. With all that done on a car say 240 RWH we are up to lets say 50 ish RWH @ as a average.. so that will be 290 RWH and you didnt even go to any internials like Cam, pistens or anything like that. A new cam and intake man. might get you 30 RWH so to me 300 is a nice N/A target but hey what do I know im no car mech.. If I am wrong please state in a reply so I can get my facts right.. Thanx guys

P.S with all that imagion TT or SC hehe
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 02:52 PM
  #9  
350zdanny's Avatar
350zdanny
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Default

I would have to say that 300 RWH is not that hard.. They are putting what 240ish out so that is 50 - 60ish HP that heeds to be made. With Headers, high flow cats out to a true duel exhaust with X pipe will get you about 25 - 30 HP Then pullys have seen about 7HP gains. Grounding kit gets you about 3 HP.. Flywheel will be about 4 HP.. 100% synthetic oil has been known for its 1 - 3 HP gains but who knows on that lil.. Intake will get you about 5 HP.. ECU that will give about 7HP and make the comp dumb so it will not retard itself. With all that done on a car say 240 RWH we are up to lets say 50 ish RWH @ as a average.. so that will be 290 RWH and you didnt even go to any internials like Cam, pistens or anything like that. A new cam and intake man. might get you 30 RWH so to me 300 is a nice N/A target but hey what do I know im no car mech.. If I am wrong please state in a reply so I can get my facts right.. Thanx guys
I'd say I agree with you, but I'd be a little more conservative. Let's itemize this **** like we're accountants.


Intake/Headers/Exhaust................ 25 whp
Pulleys........................................... 7 whp
Flywheel/Grounding/Oil?................ 5 whp
Crawford Plenum........................... 9 whp (Peak ofcourse)

Total............................................... 46 whp


So lets call it between 40 and 50 whp because, as everyone knows, gains are just not addative like this all the time. Either way, on the conservative end that would put you between 270 and 290 whp depending on your baseline. I figure 230-240 is what most people report. Once an ECU is available, that and a pair of conservative cams should put you right around 300+.

Then pop in some 11.5/1 pistons and upgraded rods if you're not satisfied and turn up the HP that way.

Obviously this is pretty expensive, but in the long run I don't think it'll necessarily be more expensive then a properly tuned turbo setup.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 03:57 PM
  #10  
racingdynamcs's Avatar
racingdynamcs
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Closter, NJ
Default

on the Z crank to wheel power loss is 15% of the total HP

287 HP and 242 to the wheels

a full exhaust/ intake / ECU will give you 50HP or PS

Pulleys 7 whp (if that)
Flywheel/Grounding/Oil.... 5 whp (w/e the guy on top said)

62HP + 287 = 349HP - 15% = 296.65RWHP

then you can do cams, 12:1 compression ratio pistons/new rods....port and polish will give you like 3whp...so you can get 300+RWHP but is it worth it??? why not just get a turbo set up??
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 04:31 PM
  #11  
prisoner's Avatar
prisoner
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
Default

Simple bolt-ons won't void the warranty like a turbo setup would, right? That could be an issue for many people.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 04:46 PM
  #12  
RedRocketZ's Avatar
RedRocketZ
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Irvine CA
Default

Simple bolt-ons won't void the warranty like a turbo setup would, right? That could be an issue for many people.

Yeah if you take the bolt ons off every time you go to the dealer. I've heard of dealers that are cool with Bolt ons and some will tell you your tires uneven ware is due to your injen intake.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 05:41 PM
  #13  
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 1
From: jacksonville, FL
Default

Actually with the flywheel and udps were looking at more like a 12% drive train loss so we see bigger gains with them the more power we put out. And at the typical 1lb of rotating mass =~2.7 hp a flywheel that weighs half the stock part would net closer to 15 hp. Or if you want to be conservative the jwt is 14 lbs oem is 29 so even at hp/lb your looking at some serious gains. And i forgot to add that you dont need an ecu to tune your engine. Just get an afc and dyno tune it.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #14  
350zdanny's Avatar
350zdanny
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Default

Actually with the flywheel and udps were looking at more like a 12% drive train loss so we see bigger gains with them the more power we put out. And at the typical 1lb of rotating mass =~2.7 hp a flywheel that weighs half the stock part would net closer to 15 hp. Or if you want to be conservative the jwt is 14 lbs oem is 29 so even at hp/lb your looking at some serious gains. And i forgot to add that you dont need an ecu to tune your engine. Just get an afc and dyno tune it.
I didn't know that flywheel gains were that substantial. That really doesn't make sense though. A flywheel that weight half stock would then, theoretically, give you more than 30 hp gain. I thought the gains from flywheel were more in the acceleration department by way of a faster revving engine. I'm no expert on flywheel technology though.

I agree that you can get an afc, but if you're going to drop so much cash doing an N/A tune, you may as well get a stand alone.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 06:07 PM
  #15  
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 1
From: jacksonville, FL
Default

I was under the impression that a rough estimate was every lb makes a 2.7 hp gain. But i know thats a little optimistic so i roughly estimated that if we gain at least 1 hp for every pound off the flywheel oyull get about 15 hp, id even be happy with 10. Its all about the rotating mass and your drive train losses which if you can minimize then you get the most out of all that power your engine makes.

And thats true danny i didnt think of using a stand alone. A basic one only costs about a grand which is a little more than twice what an afc costs. I remember seeing that our afr is like 10 or 11 which is really rich for an na car so im guessing that some gains could be had there.

Last edited by PoWeRtRiP; Jun 23, 2003 at 06:10 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2003 | 07:44 PM
  #16  
Buub's Avatar
Buub
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
From: Kirkland, WA (Seattle)
Default

Ive seen dyoes of guys with just an intake putting down about 252 rwhp
I dunno... That sounds like some pretty ideal (read: not very reproducable) conditions. I get mid ~230's rwhp with AEM CAI and Mobil-1 (otherwise stock 6-sp Touring).

That was with four back-to-back runs that were extremely consistent. The car had roughly 10k on it, so it was well broken-in, and I drove it there, so the engine was at normal operating temperature.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 07:54 PM
  #17  
Spencer3551's Avatar
Spencer3551
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Waco Tx.
Default

Okay I'm a bit confused I also have the dream of hitting 300whp with bolt-ons in my 03 manual, But when i went to the dyno earlier today i was very very disappointed. Heres a list of my mods and the results.
K&N Cai
Kinetix uppper plenum
Moderdyne 5/16 spacer
Moderdyne Mrev2 lower plenum
Megan radiador
Mishomoto racing thermostat
Cat Delete straight pipes
cat back exhaust.
UR 3 pulley set
osiros tune
I went to a shop with a "Dyno Dynamics" Dyno and my base line was only 220. After the osiros tune by up-rev i peaked at 233.9whp. Why so low someone please explain because the owner said he had done a lot of 350's and mine put out great numbers for bolts on he seemed impressed but i was not.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 08:21 PM
  #18  
kacz07's Avatar
kacz07
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Default

Once upon a time, ten years after that thread was last updated...

https://my350z.com/forum/na-builds/4...50z-revup.html
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2013 | 08:22 PM
  #19  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

Try another dyno to compare numbers? How does the car feel, silly question but dyno numbers are just that numbers without a correct baseline before the mods. That dyno seems to read very low compared to the norm.

I would say completely stock you should of been around 230-240...then with those mods 260 area...

Again search some more and source out other z members in the area

EDIT


Lmao didn't even check the date lmao super Mario bump on this one

Last edited by KingBaby; Feb 20, 2013 at 08:24 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2013 | 09:46 AM
  #20  
Classy's Avatar
Classy
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,606
Likes: 615
From: Houston
Default

Just get a c5 then...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350Z_Al
Exterior & Interior
133
Oct 29, 2020 07:44 PM
foxsmp26
New Owners
13
Sep 25, 2015 09:48 AM
state
Cleaning & Detailing
3
Apr 25, 2003 05:04 PM
mcduck
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
21
Jan 3, 2003 07:52 AM
LA-Z
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
8
Aug 22, 2002 08:18 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 AM.