PRM kit - dyno results
03-27-2008, 08:38 AM
#21
LOL-the PRM dyno run number should be AFTER the baseline, and the high number run was #3 as seen by the dyno and low (supposedly stock) is run #6. That makes no sense, I wasnt born yesterday and I smell BS. Ive seen numbers fluctuate like that with the same mods. Also-in doing a comparison rev the car to redline on all runs, not just some.
03-27-2008, 09:26 AM
#24
Originally Posted by fioriii
I just got the results on my car with the PRM kit on it. Everything went very well. I've attatched the data for your viewing pleasure.
03-27-2008, 09:29 AM
#25
New Member
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by DraGonAlchemist
and the fact that the heat shield itself gets a tad hot pays you no never mind? hey im not knocking them down. .i just prefer CAI
Last edited by blasian; 03-27-2008 at 09:31 AM.
03-27-2008, 09:47 AM
#26
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
LOL-the PRM dyno run number should be AFTER the baseline, and the high number run was #3 as seen by the dyno and low (supposedly stock) is run #6. That makes no sense, I wasnt born yesterday and I smell BS. Ive seen numbers fluctuate like that with the same mods. Also-in doing a comparison rev the car to redline on all runs, not just some.
any way to ban the IP's of these crooks that come on the site?
03-27-2008, 11:45 AM
#29
Originally Posted by Alberto
LOL-the PRM dyno run number should be AFTER the baseline, and the high number run was #3 as seen by the dyno and low (supposedly stock) is run #6. That makes no sense, I wasnt born yesterday and I smell BS. Ive seen numbers fluctuate like that with the same mods. Also-in doing a comparison rev the car to redline on all runs, not just some.
+1 lol
03-27-2008, 11:47 AM
#30
New Member
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Get out my way pimpin, LA
Posts: 33,731
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by aceman
I still find it hard to believe that there is a Intake that is better than the stock box with a K&N drop in filter..
I agree with Alberto, that dyno makes no sense....
Todd
I agree with Alberto, that dyno makes no sense....
Todd
j/k
Your secret lover
Greg
03-27-2008, 11:49 AM
#31
Originally Posted by blasian
Umm.... so you're saying that the fact that some people have actually swapped to SRI from CAI and gotten FASTER doesn't make any sense?
lol that dude has no clue... i had a nismo cai and i sucked... i lost hp.. only thing i gained was a growl and it wasnt worth the power lost... i turned it into a shot ram and even with the heat soak i felt a noticable gain in power/throttle response... that dude clearly doesnt know what he's talking about... a longer tube with bends is bad compared to a short ram with a heat shield alteast in MY case... i'll never put another long tbe on my z... ever
03-27-2008, 12:09 PM
#32
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaProdigy
lol that dude has no clue...
03-27-2008, 12:19 PM
#34
Originally Posted by DraGonAlchemist
and the fact that the heat shield itself gets a tad hot pays you no never mind? hey im not knocking them down. .i just prefer CAI
That's enough proof...
in regards to this particular intake, the amount of filter surface area looks considerably smaller than stock...
03-27-2008, 12:54 PM
#36
Originally Posted by DaProdigy
lol that dude has no clue... i had a nismo cai and i sucked... i lost hp.. only thing i gained was a growl and it wasnt worth the power lost... i turned it into a shot ram and even with the heat soak i felt a noticable gain in power/throttle response... that dude clearly doesnt know what he's talking about... a longer tube with bends is bad compared to a short ram with a heat shield alteast in MY case... i'll never put another long tbe on my z... ever
+1 Only long tubes going in my Z are the results of going Turbo.
03-27-2008, 01:13 PM
#37
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: the islands
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vq.turbo.DremZ
It's documented that in comparison to cai, sri's or stock airboxes with a different filter has yielded better times on the 1/4 mile...
That's enough proof...
in regards to this particular intake, the amount of filter surface area looks considerably smaller than stock...
That's enough proof...
in regards to this particular intake, the amount of filter surface area looks considerably smaller than stock...
Show me with some pictures or a link proving this statement/documentation!! like a shoot out or something. .
Last edited by DraGonAlchemist; 03-27-2008 at 01:16 PM.
03-27-2008, 01:18 PM
#38
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: the islands
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by blasian
Umm.... so you're saying that the fact that some people have actually swapped to SRI from CAI and gotten FASTER doesn't make any sense?
03-27-2008, 01:41 PM
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: the islands
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaProdigy
theres no need for a damn dyno... will air travel faster through a longer bent straw or a short straight staw... if that doesnt explain it to you then i think you might need to take physics 101 or somthing because.... damn
BUT YOU WIN! DAMN!!
Last edited by DraGonAlchemist; 03-27-2008 at 01:57 PM.