Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

This guy says 4.083 is slower than stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #1  
Steve-O Z33's Avatar
Steve-O Z33
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: Creedmoor, NC
Default This guy says 4.083 is slower than stock

Someone please help me out and tell this guy that 4.083 gears do not slow the 350Z down. He's saying I should go for 3.3 gearing to be faster.

http://www.carolinanissans.com/forum...0&#entry302324
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #2  
xzotklr's Avatar
xzotklr
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
From: usa
Default

In a F/I application 3.3 gearing will allow you to wind out the motor in each gear longer than with the stock gears. You give up some top speed to gain acceleration.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 02:25 PM
  #3  
Steve-O Z33's Avatar
Steve-O Z33
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: Creedmoor, NC
Default

Originally Posted by xzotklr
In a F/I application 3.3 gearing will allow you to wind out the motor in each gear longer than with the stock gears. You give up some top speed to gain acceleration.
He is saying that 3.3 gears are HIGHER than 3.56 and that 4.083 is LOWER gearing than 3.56. It's the opposite.

My impression:
Lower gearing=lower ratio/taller gears
Higher gearing=higher ratio/shorter gears

Am I right?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 02:27 PM
  #4  
Spork's Avatar
Spork
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 27,592
Likes: 6
From: MN
Default

Define "faster" in this situation.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #5  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

The track is what? Drag racing? Autocross? Open road?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #6  
INTIMAZY's Avatar
INTIMAZY
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 5
From: Staten Island / NYC
Default

In the maths world, 4.08 will always be faster from a stop.
In the real world, it depends on your power level and subsequent grip situation.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 04:31 PM
  #7  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

LOTS of reading to be had about 4.08s here: https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-...installed.html
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 05:02 PM
  #8  
Sylvan Lake V35's Avatar
Sylvan Lake V35
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1
From: Alberta Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Steve-O Z33
Someone please help me out and tell this guy that 4.083 gears do not slow the 350Z down. He's saying I should go for 3.3 gearing to be faster.

http://www.carolinanissans.com/forum...0&#entry302324

The theory is the higher the number(lower ratio) will give you quicker acceleration out of the hole. So 4.083 should be quicker out of the hole than 3.3s. Forced induction cars that run over 500whp often swap to the 3.3 gear sets the longer ratios help reduce tire spin in the first few gears. Otherwise the first few gears are useless when running higher power. i have drove a FI car in the 450wtq with 3.9s they seemed fine but with the 600+wtq I have the 3.3s still go through the first 2 gears very quickly.

I just read the other thread you seem to be correct on the theory 3.9s should be quicker out of the hole than 3.3s unless pushing very high hp/tq numbers then the 3.3s might prove an advantage.

Last edited by Sylvan Lake V35; Mar 22, 2010 at 05:16 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #9  
Steve-O Z33's Avatar
Steve-O Z33
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: Creedmoor, NC
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
The track is what? Drag racing? Autocross? Open road?
Any of them. I mean, I could see a tight road course giving traction issues with the 4.08s but I think it'd be better all around for a NA 350Z.

If you read about time attack, a lot of the cars built for that have a higher gear ratio. Some of the hondas are running like 4.7s or higher. It's a torque multiplier and it gets you the most acceleration out of every gear.

This is the 2nd person to tell me that when going from a 3.5 to a 4.08 is lowering the gearing. I guess they like to refer to the actual longevity of the gears instead of the actual ratio? Maybe I'm out of the loop?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 06:39 PM
  #10  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

You increase the gear ratio (or multiplying torque) but this is termed a "shorter" gear because the speed range for which that gear is active reduces. Acceleration increases but so does the necessity to switch to the next higher gear at an earlier point. Shortening the final drive (increasing final drive torque multiplication) but ALSO increasing redline helps maintain the best of both worlds . As you might guess, selecting gear ratios matched to an engine's torque curve and rev limit is the way to go...

Last edited by rcdash; Mar 22, 2010 at 06:41 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 08:46 PM
  #11  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Steve-O Z33
Any of them. I mean, I could see a tight road course giving traction issues with the 4.08s but I think it'd be better all around for a NA 350Z.

If you read about time attack, a lot of the cars built for that have a higher gear ratio. Some of the hondas are running like 4.7s or higher. It's a torque multiplier and it gets you the most acceleration out of every gear.

This is the 2nd person to tell me that when going from a 3.5 to a 4.08 is lowering the gearing. I guess they like to refer to the actual longevity of the gears instead of the actual ratio? Maybe I'm out of the loop?
All of them is a lengthily discussion of pros and cons of each. There is no “best” gearing for all driving.

NOTE: rcdash is on target. Altering gears (transmission or final drive) is similar to altering tire circumference. Torque and horsepower are the same. The motor makes torque not the gears. Besides the Z has 6 forward gears. Plenty to choose from.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 07:44 AM
  #12  
scotts300's Avatar
scotts300
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,193
Likes: 7
From: Away
Default

Originally Posted by Steve-O Z33
Any of them. I mean, I could see a tight road course giving traction issues with the 4.08s but I think it'd be better all around for a NA 350Z.

If you read about time attack, a lot of the cars built for that have a higher gear ratio. Some of the hondas are running like 4.7s or higher. It's a torque multiplier and it gets you the most acceleration out of every gear.

This is the 2nd person to tell me that when going from a 3.5 to a 4.08 is lowering the gearing. I guess they like to refer to the actual longevity of the gears instead of the actual ratio? Maybe I'm out of the loop?
Originally Posted by davidv
All of them is a lengthily discussion of pros and cons of each. There is no “best” gearing for all driving.

NOTE: rcdash is on target. Altering gears (transmission or final drive) is similar to altering tire circumference. Torque and horsepower are the same. The motor makes torque not the gears. Besides the Z has 6 forward gears. Plenty to choose from.
Pros, cons, and LOTS of discussion about 4.08s here, again, here: https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-...installed.html
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ablaine
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
51
Nov 29, 2016 10:13 AM
HoBrahYouStink
Media Share
32
Jun 24, 2016 10:58 PM
MicVelo
NorCal Marketplace
9
Oct 4, 2015 07:55 PM
Tochigi_236
Feedback & Suggestions for Our Forum
8
Sep 27, 2015 03:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:29 AM.