Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Turbonetics Kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:07 PM
  #41  
xxlbeerZ's Avatar
xxlbeerZ
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by APS
Mia, the photograph was taken from a particular angle to show the relevant components clearly. I can see how you could mistakenly believe that the turbocharger assembly is low, but this is definitely not the case.

The safety of the turbocharger and its associated components from road debris should be of no concern at all - and the engineering/testing conducted by APS further supports this.

As Peter has already stated, you would need to do significant damage to the underside of the car (crushing rails and sheet metal) before going anywhere near the turbocharger.

George
Can you please take a photograph showing it planar to bottom of the car? Or even take one of the actual car as it sits on the ground to see what it'll actually look like droppped down not up on a lift? Maybe it's really not that close, it's just the pics....
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:08 PM
  #42  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by APS
Mia, let me say it again but in a different way. The crossmember, side rails and a plethora of stock components sit well below the turbocharger. To damage the turbocharger you would have to completely destroy these components first. In addition, if you did damage these components so badly that the turbocharger came into contact with the speed hump, sufficient energy will have already been absorbed in destroying the underside of the car to limit the impact energy upon the turbocharger - which after all is a massive and very robust ni-resist casting.

I think that you're trying to create an issue where it does not exist in the real world.

George
Let me say THIS again. From the pics you have available it looks to me and other people that the turbine housing is AT LEAST as low as the bottom of the stock cats. If that is the case you cannot tell me there is no potential for damage from speed bumps etc. I can certainly take some pics of the damage to my stock cat shields from scraping on crap that was otherwise unavoidable If you have pics to refute this ok lets see them. You can say what you want to but seeing is believing. I SEE the pics you have and the turbo is capable of damage.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #43  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by APS
I get your point very clearly though if the decision is between an insufficiently sized down pipe ( around 2.75'' which will limit the future power potential of the engine) and very high under hood temperature versus slightly less ground clearance to the large 3.5'' engine pipe and a much cooler engine compartment then I'll go with the slightly lower down pipe all day, every day, just my 2 cents worth.


Thanks

Peter
Sure on a non-daily driven car or a car that has a million dollar company to fix it if it breaks sure.... For the average joe who is investing his savings into a turbo kit thats not going to cut it. The reality is that ground clearance is a MAJOR issue and having the turbo at the point of contact with ANYTHING is not going to cut it. If you live anywhere in Cali as I do you know what kind of weird **** there is on the roads.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #44  
APS's Avatar
APS
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Sorry but the pics you have just don't support that statement. I'll be happy to take a measurement for you. Although I must say that I am MORE then happy having a 3" downpipe as opposed to:

(A) Scraping and banging my turbine housing against speed bumps

(B) Having nice cold water splash onto my turbine housing during operation

(C) Having something snag my water feed

(D) Having to worry about ANOTHER pump and point of failure

(E) Having an huge heat source parked right next to the one item in the Z that has been shown to fail over and again (read transmission)
Miaplaya I have a lot more faith in our engineering staff (between them they have over 200 years of turbo system design experience) than you and I'll put my faith in this experience all day every day, no problem at all.

I'll look forward to seing you confirm the 2.75'' down pipe from the top mounted turbocharger system, this is something that APS would NEVER compromise on, after all, all of the exhaust gas is being routed through this small and under sized down pipe, not clever in my view, that's basic engineering

Have a good day.

Thanks

Peter

Last edited by APS; Mar 21, 2005 at 02:18 PM.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:17 PM
  #45  
ZZtopp's Avatar
ZZtopp
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

I checked again underneath my car, and there are no panels exclusive to the track model that would interfere with the mounting of the turbo. I see some very minor scrapes on my cats, but that's about it. If the lowest point on the turbo is well above the lowest point on the cats, then I see no problem....but if it's as low as their lowest point, then there could be an issue. It's still hard to tell from the photos.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:19 PM
  #46  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by APS
Miaplaya I have a lot more faith in our engineering staff (between them they have over 200 years of turbo system design experience) than you and I'll put my faith in this experience all day every day, no problem at all.

I'll look forward to seing you confirm the 2.75'' down pipe from the top mounted turbocharger system, this is something that APS would NEVER compromise on, after all all of the exhaust gas is being routed through this small and under sized down pipe, not clever in my view, that's basic engineering

Have a good day.

Thanks

Peter
Hmm something tells me that you have ZERO idea how big the pipe is on the Turbonetics kit. Oh and thats great I'm sure your engineering staff is well versed and all but no amount of knowledge in turbocharging can make reality a Peter Pan World (no pun intended) where everything is as you wish. I've said it again and again... FROM THE PICS YOU CURRENTLY HAVE IT LOOKS LIKE THE TURBINE HOUSING IS AT LEAST AS LOW AS THE STOCK CATS. IF THIS IS THE CASE DAMAGE FROM ROAD DEBRIS/SPEED BUMPS, ETC IS VERY POSSIBLE. I HAVE PICS OF MY STOCK CATS TO PROVE THIS
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:25 PM
  #47  
APS's Avatar
APS
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Hmm something tells me that you have ZERO idea how big the pipe is on the Turbonetics kit. Oh and thats great I'm sure your engineering staff is well versed and all but no amount of knowledge in turbocharging can make reality a Peter Pan World (no pun intended) where everything is as you wish. I've said it again and again... FROM THE PICS YOU CURRENTLY HAVE IT LOOKS LIKE THE TURBINE HOUSING IS AT LEAST AS LOW AS THE STOCK CATS. IF THIS IS THE CASE DAMAGE FROM ROAD DEBRIS/SPEED BUMPS, ETC IS VERY POSSIBLE. I HAVE PICS OF MY STOCK CATS TO PROVE THIS
Miaplaya, Some pics coming your way very soon to clarify your misconception, hope you enjoy.

Thanks

Peter

PS, I look forward to seeing your down pipe measurements.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:27 PM
  #48  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by APS
Miaplaya, Some pics coming your way very soon to clarify your misconception, hope you enjoy.

Thanks

Peter
Waiting.....
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:29 PM
  #49  
APS's Avatar
APS
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Waiting.....
Coming your way soon mia, in the interim why don't you confirm the size of your down pipe?

Thanks

Peter
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #50  
ZZtopp's Avatar
ZZtopp
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

I'll bet the down pipe is smaller than the font Mia just used.......
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:34 PM
  #51  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by APS
Coming your way soon mia, in the interim why don't you confirm the size of your down pipe?

Thanks

Peter
Well lets see since you obviously only post info about your own company you must have missed the fact that my car is in the body shop right now. I'm sure I could leave work and interrupt their repair work but thats not going to happen. But since you are interested I did confirm that it is a 3" downpipe. And no not from Turbonetics. I cannot tell you where precisely it was measured as I am not there and cannot get there before they close.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:39 PM
  #52  
APS's Avatar
APS
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by APS
Miaplaya, Some pics coming your way very soon to clarify your misconception, hope you enjoy.




I hope that the above pictures satisfy your concerns regarding turbo placement Mia.

George
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #53  
tig488's Avatar
tig488
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 0
From: bama
Default

youre right nothings gonna hit that, well unless its a horse, haha jk APS,
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #54  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by APS




I hope that the above pictures satisfy your concerns regarding turbo placement Mia.

George
No they don't. My car looks the EXACT same way with my factory cats on but it doesn't mean I haven't damaged them on speed bumps. Show me a pic of a car without your kit...it looks the same. Doesn't mean TONS of people havent ripped the weeve on the flex joint of their y pipe due to scraping. Those pics prove nothing.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #55  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Here



Look I can't see my cats hanging down...that scraping I heard must just be in my head...oh wait...how did those scratches get on the cat housing?
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #56  
APS's Avatar
APS
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Well lets see since you obviously only post info about your own company you must have missed the fact that my car is in the body shop right now. I'm sure I could leave work and interrupt their repair work but thats not going to happen. But since you are interested I did confirm that it is a 3" downpipe. And no not from Turbonetics. I cannot tell you where precisely it was measured as I am not there and cannot get there before they close.
I'll give you a tip, Might be worth while measuring your down pipe with a vernier calliper.

Where the down pipe goes past the exhaust manifold, unless imperial measurements are different in the US I'm positive you will find the diameter is only 2.75 inches.

Let me know when you measure the pipe accurately.

Thanks

Peter
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 03:00 PM
  #57  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by APS
I'll give you a tip, Might be worth while measuring your down pipe with a vernier calliper.

Where the down pipe goes past the exhaust manifold, unless imperial measurements are different in the US I'm positive you will find the diameter is only 2.75 inches.

Let me know when you measure the pipe accurately.

Thanks

Peter
Oh ok well since my name aint Snap-On the minute you send me one I'll do that. Until then I had it measured and it was 3". Sorry if that bursts your bubble. And of course you are so sure because you have done just that with the Turbonetics kit right?
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 03:02 PM
  #58  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

BTW might I commend you on jumping onto another thread specifically titled "Turbonetics Kit" and dropping your product around. Again I LOVE the way you do business.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 03:03 PM
  #59  
ZZtopp's Avatar
ZZtopp
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Perhaps taking off the front tire and getting us some sort of shot that shows the relationship of the bottom of the turbo housing to the cross member or the downpipe would help.

By the way, I appreciate you APS guys participating on this forum and being concerned enough to address issues as they come up.
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #60  
ZZtopp's Avatar
ZZtopp
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
BTW might I commend you on jumping onto another thread specifically titled "Turbonetics Kit" and dropping your product around. Again I LOVE the way you do business.
MIa,

You're the one who first brought up the APS kit on this thread...by trashing it. I see no problem with them responding to your criticism.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 PM.