Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Turbonetics SAFE MODE @ 4.5RPM!! ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:11 AM
  #1  
veilside350zTT's Avatar
veilside350zTT
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default Turbonetics SAFE MODE @ 4.5RPM!! ???

Hey guys i was very excited to pick up my car yesterday from the shop. Yes finally turbo. But i ran into a problem..


When I take my car above 4.5 RPM my car kicks into safe mode and after taht shift it wont let me go above 2.5 RPM.. If I turn my car off and on it fixes that and i can drive normally again.. As long as its below 4.5RPM.

When I keep it below 4.5rpm the car sounds great and the turbo pulls nicely. And does NOT go into safe mode as long as it keep it below 4.5 RPM..

Any Ideas what this can be?? My car is an 04 350z track. My mods are below

-Unorthodox pulleys
-Borla dual exhaust. Custom Y pipe to work with Turbonetics..

p.s. My installer did the same kit on his G35 and his works great. Did i get a bad flash?? This is my first turbo car so im very lost right now.. THANKS!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:18 AM
  #2  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by veilside350zTT
Hey guys i was very excited to pick up my car yesterday from the shop. Yes finally turbo. But i ran into a problem..


When I take my car above 4.5 RPM my car kicks into safe mode and after taht shift it wont let me go above 2.5 RPM.. If I turn my car off and on it fixes that and i can drive normally again.. As long as its below 4.5RPM.

When I keep it below 4.5rpm the car sounds great and the turbo pulls nicely. And does NOT go into safe mode as long as it keep it below 4.5 RPM..

Any Ideas what this can be?? My car is an 04 350z track. My mods are below

-Unorthodox pulleys
-Borla dual exhaust. Custom Y pipe to work with Turbonetics..

p.s. My installer did the same kit on his G35 and his works great. Did i get a bad flash?? This is my first turbo car so im very lost right now.. THANKS!
Probably NOT the flash. If it was you would be in limp mode as soon as the car started. If you are only hitting 8 PSI of boost my first guess is a boost leak somewhere. Why am I getting the wierdest sense of deja vu right now? Didn't I just talk to you on AIM? Do this:

Take car to installer, turn off car, pressurize system, check for leaks. If this hasn't been done it needs to be. If it has been done you need to verify the vacuum routing. Line from compressor outlet to wastegate lower port. From plenum outlet to BOV upper port. If this is correct attempt to swap MAF.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #3  
1 2 NV's Avatar
1 2 NV
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Why didn't your installer come across this problem before giving you the car back? I am no pro but sounds like a MAF problem to me.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #4  
westpak's Avatar
westpak
SFZCC
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2
From: Lake Worth, FL
Default

You are probably hitting the threshold for the MAF and going past the voltage it expects to see, this usually happens around 8-9 psi of boost.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 10:04 AM
  #5  
jdm3fiddyZ's Avatar
jdm3fiddyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
Default

Yeah it def sounds like MAF overload to me.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #6  
chimmike's Avatar
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton/Sarasota
Default

westpak, seriously, if that was the case, ALL TN owners would have this issue.

mine reaches 8.5psi, no issues. Taurran is at 9.5psi and no issues.

I think there's a leak around the MAF somewhere, or, maybe they installed it backwards??
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #7  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by westpak
You are probably hitting the threshold for the MAF and going past the voltage it expects to see, this usually happens around 8-9 psi of boost.
Nope. I've been up to 10psi on this kit with no issues. My car has never been in limp mode and I beat on it quite regularly boosting to 9 - 9.5psi (with an ebc).

Just like mia said, boost leak or maf problem.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #8  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by westpak
You are probably hitting the threshold for the MAF and going past the voltage it expects to see, this usually happens around 8-9 psi of boost.
What are you basing this info on? At 14.7 ambient, 68 degrees farenheit, on a loaded Dynapck my car can hit 13.7 PSI before the MAF goes over voltage. Tested and confirmed. Where are you getting the 8-9 PSI number from exactly? And what data do you have have to support this? kcobean has boosted as high as 12 PSI continiously without going over voltage in lower temps then mine. I'd say you should have some data to back up your claim.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 10:30 AM
  #9  
westpak's Avatar
westpak
SFZCC
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2
From: Lake Worth, FL
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
What are you basing this info on? At 14.7 ambient, 68 degrees farenheit, on a loaded Dynapck my car can hit 13.7 PSI before the MAF goes over voltage. Tested and confirmed. Where are you getting the 8-9 PSI number from exactly? And what data do you have have to support this? kcobean has boosted as high as 12 PSI continiously without going over voltage in lower temps then mine. I'd say you should have some data to back up your claim.
WOW why has everyone changed their view of such an issue, MIAPLAYA you need to keep track of what you answer on other threads

https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/159883-problems-with-turbonetics-kit.html
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 10:33 AM
  #10  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by westpak
WOW why has everyone changed their view of such an issue, MIAPLAYA you need to keep track of what you answer on other threads

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=159883
He said basically the same thing in the other post, but implied it might be a bad MAF.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 10:35 AM
  #11  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by westpak
WOW why has everyone changed their view of such an issue, MIAPLAYA you need to keep track of what you answer on other threads

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=159883
Um my answer is the same...here are my replies from the thread you linked.

Originally Posted by me other thread
All of the above are correct. If turning the car off and turning it back on fixes it your MAF is freaking. If it doesn't then check for a loose boost pipe. Check all the couplers especially around the intercooler..
Originally Posted by me other thread
If the MAF fried theres nothing that could have prevented this...the MAF just went bad..it sounds like its most likely a boost leak somewhere...Just checking all the couplers might locate the issue.
Originally Posted by me in other thread
I wouldn't drive my car anywhere in limp mode...
sounds like the SAME EXACT thing I just said...
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 11:09 AM
  #12  
westpak's Avatar
westpak
SFZCC
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2
From: Lake Worth, FL
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
What are you basing this info on? At 14.7 ambient, 68 degrees farenheit, on a loaded Dynapck my car can hit 13.7 PSI before the MAF goes over voltage. Tested and confirmed. Where are you getting the 8-9 PSI number from exactly? And what data do you have have to support this? kcobean has boosted as high as 12 PSI continiously without going over voltage in lower temps then mine. I'd say you should have some data to back up your claim.
Well depending on conditions not al might reach it at the same boost level.

This is something that was thought a while back, although not from a research lab there is some info here https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/62738-bad-news-for-the-big-boosters.html from one of the early boost pioneers on the 350Z
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #13  
chimmike's Avatar
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton/Sarasota
Default

simple fact is, he's not maxing out the MAF. Unless his car is a much more incredible air pump than the typical VQ35.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #14  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by westpak
Well depending on conditions not al might reach it at the same boost level.

This is something that was thought a while back, although not from a research lab there is some info here https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=62738 from one of the early boost pioneers on the 350Z
Of course the coniditions matter. But the conidition that affects this is MASS AIR FLOW. Not pressure ratio. If the right conditions were met and the MASS AIR FLOW at 8 PSI caused the sensor to go over 4.89 volts (IIRC that is max) then yes it will go into limp mode. At 8 PSI on the 60-1 with ambient pressure of 14.7:1 and ambient temp at 68 degrees farenheit there is not sufficient airflow to cause the sensor to go over voltage. Ambient temp, ambient pressure, and pressure ratio of course will affect this. But so far no one has reported a properly operating system with no leaks causing MAF sensor over voltage at the out of box pressure ratio in temps as low as 30 degrees. His ambient temp is in the 40s according to his AIM message to me and his ambient pressure is not much different then mine. His ambient conditions have been met and exceeded in both extremes by Turbonetics or Turbonetics customers several times over and a over voltage condition was not reached. The thread just linked here while containing good information essentially has ZERO bearing on this thread for several reasons.

(1) That info is over 2 years old and I think we can all agree a lot more is known about this car and ECU now then there was then
(2) The pressure ratio in question in that thread has ZERO bearing on this for the simple fact that there are TWO turbos running at that pressure ratio which have a DRASTICALLY different Mass Air FLow Rate then the 60-1 single turbo does
(3) The ambient conditions were not even stated in that thread (that I saw but I'm not going to read 4 pages of irrelevant info)
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 12:18 PM
  #15  
westpak's Avatar
westpak
SFZCC
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,420
Likes: 2
From: Lake Worth, FL
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Of course the coniditions matter. But the conidition that affects this is MASS AIR FLOW. Not pressure ratio. If the right conditions were met and the MASS AIR FLOW at 8 PSI caused the sensor to go over 4.89 volts (IIRC that is max) then yes it will go into limp mode. At 8 PSI on the 60-1 with ambient pressure of 14.7:1 and ambient temp at 68 degrees farenheit there is not sufficient airflow to cause the sensor to go over voltage. Ambient temp, ambient pressure, and pressure ratio of course will affect this. But so far no one has reported a properly operating system with no leaks causing MAF sensor over voltage at the out of box pressure ratio in temps as low as 30 degrees. His ambient temp is in the 40s according to his AIM message to me and his ambient pressure is not much different then mine. His ambient conditions have been met and exceeded in both extremes by Turbonetics or Turbonetics customers several times over and a over voltage condition was not reached. The thread just linked here while containing good information essentially has ZERO bearing on this thread for several reasons.

(1) That info is over 2 years old and I think we can all agree a lot more is known about this car and ECU now then there was then
(2) The pressure ratio in question in that thread has ZERO bearing on this for the simple fact that there are TWO turbos running at that pressure ratio which have a DRASTICALLY different Mass Air FLow Rate then the 60-1 single turbo does
(3) The ambient conditions were not even stated in that thread (that I saw but I'm not going to read 4 pages of irrelevant info)
Well what more is known about the 350Z ECU that would make the info on the thread irrelevant? have you done similar test to come up with different ideas?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #16  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by westpak
Well what more is known about the 350Z ECU that would make the info on the thread irrelevant? have you done similar test to come up with different ideas?
Several things have been learned may be not by you but by others. For instance how the QA table is altered, how effective the flash is modified for boost, additional injector scaling options, the limits of the MAF under a given pressure ratio ambient pressure and ambient temp, adjustments for ULEV2 ECUs not as easy as Ulev ones, cam phasing, and a myriad of other things. And no I have not run a similar test but rather Turbonetics ran the test. They loaded mine and their G35 on their dyno and ran the boost up to the point where the MAF went into an over volt state. Thats how they determined where the MAF sensor would go over voltage. DO you think they don't test for things like this? The difference in knowledge between early 2004 and now when boosting this car is amazing. Sorry if you fail to see that.

Furthermore what makes that thread irrelevant has already been stated but I'll state it again since you must have missed it.

THE TEST PERFORMED IN THAT THREAD WAS DONE WITH A TWIN TURBO KIT. THIS HAS ZERO BEARING IN RELATION TO A SINGLE KIT AS THE MASS FLOW RATE OF THOSE TWO SYSTEMS AT THE SAME PRESSURE RATIO IS NIGHT AND DAY DIFFERENT. MASS FLOW RATE IS THE MAJOR CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THE "MASS AIR FLOW" SENSOR GOING OVER VOLTAGE. SURELY YOU CAN UNDRESTAND THAT 8 PSI FROM A TWIN TURBO SYSTEM IS A DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT MASS FLOW RATE THEN A SINGLE

Last edited by MIAPLAYA; Mar 1, 2006 at 12:28 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 01:18 PM
  #17  
nissansource's Avatar
nissansource
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: Performance LAND
Default

i Can Type Bold Too
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 02:09 PM
  #18  
theking's Avatar
theking
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: Fort Hood, TX
Default

No boost leaks, 60-1 with typical ambient temp and pressure at 8psi would be impossible to max out. Simple as that. Even with cams and every other breathing mod it would be almost impossible. The only thing that makes sense is a boost leak(higher mass airflow with same differential pressure, in this case 8 psi),a bad reference for the wastegate or a bad maf. TURBO 101.

PS-The Magic number for the MAF limp mode is above 4.74 volts at or below 4500 rpms. That is why all us emanage guys set our voltage clamp at 4.74 below 4500 rpms. Ask Sharif, Phunk, TurboTim, etc.

Last edited by theking; Mar 1, 2006 at 02:14 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #19  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by theking
No boost leaks, 60-1 with typical ambient temp and pressure at 8psi would be impossible to max out. Simple as that. Even with cams and every other breathing mod it would be almost impossible. The only thing that makes sense is a boost leak(higher mass airflow with same differential pressure, in this case 8 psi),a bad reference for the wastegate or a bad maf. TURBO 101.

PS-The Magic number for the MAF limp mode is above 4.74 volts at or below 4500 rpms. That is why all us emanage guys set our voltage clamp at 4.74 below 4500 rpms. Ask Sharif, Phunk, TurboTim, etc.
Thank you for clarifying the voltage upper limit. I knew it was high 4 volts but did not recall exactly the voltage number. But as you said its not possible to max the MAF sensor voltage with 8 PSI of pressure added by a 60-1 in a properly operating system. The only answer lies in a boost leak most likely post MAF in which the turbo is being forced to run more pressure and therefore more CFM to maintain that pressure ratio causing the MAF to go over voltage. This has happened as a result of leaking plenums in the past and this case is no different. If the intake piping is secure it could be a leak of the plenum or gasket. Thats why my first suggestion was to pressurize the intake tract and check for leaks.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006 | 02:53 PM
  #20  
chimmike's Avatar
chimmike
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton/Sarasota
Default

To say it again, for the 50th time.....just so westpak is clear, THE MAF IS NOT BEING MAXED OUT!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MAsSIVrOOM
Engine & Drivetrain
2
Oct 20, 2023 10:50 AM
bcoffee20
Zs & Gs For Sale
5
Nov 19, 2015 06:39 PM
FromGtoZ
Intake Exhaust
2
Sep 20, 2015 03:41 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 PM.