so you guys make jokes about the RSX.. this and that.. blah blah blah
you bore me
06-30-2007, 04:56 PM
#109
Registered User
Originally Posted by doug
same question alot of Vette owners ask about 350z owners with Twin Turbo's and built motors
Always a bigger fish. Mod the car you like, period.
06-30-2007, 07:24 PM
#110
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by taurran
I'm not really impressed by a 650whp RSX. Any car can make big power with enough money.
06-30-2007, 10:06 PM
#111
dont mind him HDPD he makes wild inaccurate/ludacris statements every now n then its just something you grow to learn n accept as a part of the forums.
You know like when ur in school and you have that "special" kid and hes always yellin out in the middle of class for no reason. You learn to ignore him same thing in this case. =D hope that helps
You know like when ur in school and you have that "special" kid and hes always yellin out in the middle of class for no reason. You learn to ignore him same thing in this case. =D hope that helps
07-01-2007, 05:05 PM
#114
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
power to weight.
honda engines pull like nobodys business in the topend too.. much faster then a VQ.
Traction is the killer though. On the street, its useless until 3rd+ gears. And even then, at 700whp, you have to peddle the **** outa it. Get it onto the highway.
Honda's are my passion, like others ivehad hi-hp turbo EG's. But man, the 350z hooks up like a **** on the street. And makes anyone look like a good driver. U need some skill to control/optimally drive a turbo honda
honda engines pull like nobodys business in the topend too.. much faster then a VQ.
Traction is the killer though. On the street, its useless until 3rd+ gears. And even then, at 700whp, you have to peddle the **** outa it. Get it onto the highway.
Honda's are my passion, like others ivehad hi-hp turbo EG's. But man, the 350z hooks up like a **** on the street. And makes anyone look like a good driver. U need some skill to control/optimally drive a turbo honda
07-01-2007, 07:50 PM
#118
I had 275/40 BFG KDW tires on the rear of my Z. They wouldnt hook up worth a damn. The best I ever got was a 2.4 60ft. I even let some experinced racers try and they agreed they were crap tires for drag racing. If they lost all traction in first they would light up all the way through 2nd gear. I tried launching them over and over in diffrent conditions. At 3000-3500 rpm launch they would just fry, with my lowly 9.1 compression low horsepower engine lol.
07-01-2007, 07:54 PM
#119
Originally Posted by rocks
I had 275/40 BFG KDW tires on the rear of my Z. They wouldnt hook up worth a damn. The best I ever got was a 2.4 60ft. I even let some experinced racers try and they agreed they were crap tires for drag racing. If they lost all traction in first they would light up all the way through 2nd gear. I tried launching them over and over in diffrent conditions. At 3000-3500 rpm launch they would just fry, with my lowly 9.1 compression low horsepower engine lol.
If I can hit a 2.0 60ft in 2 of 3 stock runs, you/your guys are doing something wrong or your track sucks, or both. No excuse for an NA car with decent camber on 275 KDW2's to not hook 1.9-2.0 60ft's....
07-01-2007, 08:37 PM
#120
Registered User
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: dartmouth
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alberto
Id hit a 2.06 0ft in 2 passes If I can hit a 2.0 60ft in 2 of 3 stock runs, you/your guys are doing something wrong or your track sucks, or both. No excuse for an NA car with decent camber on 275 KDW2's to not hook 1.9-2.0 60ft's....
If I can hit a 2.0 60ft in 2 of 3 stock runs, you/your guys are doing something wrong or your track sucks, or both. No excuse for an NA car with decent camber on 275 KDW2's to not hook 1.9-2.0 60ft's....