Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Relentless Autosports - VRT: You be the judge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:21 PM
  #141  
overZealous1's Avatar
overZealous1
Registered User
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,268
Likes: 1
From: tigard oregon
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Changing out the bolts for studs is not an hour or two, unfortunately. We basically have to dissembled the entire motor (minus the shortbock), change the gasket, change the bolts for studs..reseal the engine..etc..etc. And after the initial inspection, I felt the whole engine really need to be re-checked from top to bottom. This would take a couple days that we didnt have. With the time constraints, we didnt even have time to install the meth kit that Pete wanted installed. And Scott told the customer, that if we opened the engine, that he wouldnt stand behind it...so Pete made the decision to leave it be, and I agree to tune it to low boost.
Time was our enemy, with this build.
ya, i know the gaskets would have been timely, but just the bolts would be an hour or 2. understandable to me now considering the time constraints and warranty portion though.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #142  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Thread Starter
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by failsafe306
Sharif started selling parts online out of his house, but when he started building cars hands on, he started out in his own shop, the same one he's in now. He never installed turbo kits out of his garage at home like you are suggesting.
Exactly, when I started this business, I was completely forthcoming and anyone that has been here since the begining, knows how my company started. But I NEVER worked on customer cars in my home garage, which is completely illegal.

I sold parts online, and I worked at CP Racing doing the tuning, and wrenching when time permitted.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #143  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

Originally Posted by kognition
Scott doesn't install turbo kit's in his garage like you guys are suggesting either.
I never said he did.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #144  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by kognition
But your words continue to be.... purposefully slanderous.
There's no way you can justify that remark given the evidence presented. Anyone in the same situation would come to the conclusion that the customer was being taken advantage of. Scott is taking care of the situation and providing a warranty on the motor - great. Problem solved. You are only promoting the "high school" behavior your colleague from LV was referring to.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #145  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Nforce1
The bashing continues even AFTER all explinations and resolutions have been made... High school
Umm... Just because you (and the car owner/customer) think it's resolved, doesn't mean all is right here. You are ignoring the common knowledge and overall consensus here that the OEM parts used in this engine build are very questionable (at best) for the power levels the customer asked for with intentions of race use.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:23 PM
  #146  
Zilvia's Avatar
Zilvia
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 0
From: Lima, Ohio
Default

well i think he said it would be tuned at some locas shop in vegas.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:23 PM
  #147  
Canadian's Avatar
Canadian
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by George@GTM
You want more proof then Scott himself admitting that they build their own time attack cars with OEM Head studs, gaskets and main bolts?



So if this was you, and you were going to build a 600rwhp time attack car, would you do what is virtually a OEM build? For a car that is going to be abused on a roadcourse? I guess everyone else in the community is just stupid and overbuilding all these engines, when what we really need is to learn some "Voodoo"

Give me a break...

-George
GT Motorsports
In case you didn't know, their Time Attack Z is pushing much more than 600whp, and has well over 4-5,000 track miles on it, and it is still going strong. I see where you guys are coming from, but I mean c'mon - their time attack car is proof of what they can do. I don't understand how everyone is dismissing this very important yet simple fact.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:25 PM
  #148  
GTM's Avatar
GTM
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Canadian
In case you didn't know, their Time Attack Z is pushing much more than 600whp, and has well over 4-5,000 track miles on it, and it is still going strong. I see where you guys are coming from, but I mean c'mon - their time attack car is proof of what they can do. I don't understand how everyone is dismissing this very important yet simple fact.
I believe a lot of us are still waiting on that 600rwhp dyno sheet, from a Dynojet of course.

-George
GT Motorsports
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:25 PM
  #149  
Motormouth's Avatar
Motormouth
Banned
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,190
Likes: 2
From: not here
Default

Originally Posted by George@GTM
You want more proof then Scott himself admitting that they build their own time attack cars with OEM Head studs, gaskets and main bolts?

-George
GT Motorsports
no, show me proof, since you want to state something as FACT, where any RA car is making 1-200whp less than they have stated.

I am not a technical expert to tell you whether or not the engine is up to snuff. I know you are notorious for overbuilding cars. not that it is a terrible thing to do, if for the right reasons.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:25 PM
  #150  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by George@GTM
they needed to drive a FORGED PERFORMANCE BUILT car on the race track to get first place in their recent time attack race.

-George
GT Motorsports
Oh thats right..Louies car.Sharif did the entire build and tune, and then RA and another shop come and do some free work on it, and next thing you know, there is a big a$$ RA sticker on the car as if they built it.. To me that was very tacky on both the owner of the car, and the shops that offered the sponsorship, knowing that the quality of the build would reflect ultimately to the shops stickered up on the car, when in fact they did VERY little to make the car what it was.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:26 PM
  #151  
Vegas_Speedster's Avatar
Vegas_Speedster
Registered User
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: vegas
Default

The fact that Scott stands behind the engine and is willing to warranty and RACE that car speaks volumes. You other so called tuners, get your best car and meet Scott on the track. That's where real racers settle disputes, not on a PC. Let the best build win.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #152  
D350Z10's Avatar
D350Z10
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 2
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by kognition
Scott doesn't install turbo kit's in his garage like you guys are suggesting either.

YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE *** YOUR TALKING ABOUT

Sharif Sold PARTS from his home and you can do that if you buy from wholesalers... and WORKED FOR A LICENSED SHOP ... CP Racing
HE DIDN'T WORK OUT OF HIS OWN HOUSE....

Get your facts straight once you do that, go ahead stop posting.... Your fighting against companies whose track records are virtually PERFECT...

Not Fake *** compaines that are not legally licensed and do not own real shops..
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #153  
Motormouth's Avatar
Motormouth
Banned
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,190
Likes: 2
From: not here
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
Umm... Just because you (and the car owner/customer) think it's resolved, doesn't mean all is right here. You are ignoring the common knowledge and overall consensus here that the OEM parts used in this engine build are very questionable (at best) for the power levels the customer asked for with intentions of race use.
but is that the point of this thread?

first it was stated that the customer was not given the parts promised, AFTER sharif already knew from the customer, RA & noah that he got the parts he was supposed to and that his misgivings could be explained by a clerical error.

and he still.made.the.thread. < am I the only one who sees a problem with this?
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #154  
Canadian's Avatar
Canadian
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by Vegas_Speedster
The fact that Scott stands behind the engine and is willing to warranty and RACE that car speaks volumes. You other so called tuners, get your best car and meet Scott on the track. That's where real racers settle disputes, not on a PC. Let the best build win.
+1 couldn't agree more.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #155  
Zilvia's Avatar
Zilvia
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,205
Likes: 0
From: Lima, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Canadian
In case you didn't know, their Time Attack Z is pushing much more than 600whp, and has well over 4-5,000 track miles on it, and it is still going strong. I see where you guys are coming from, but I mean c'mon - their time attack car is proof of what they can do. I don't understand how everyone is dismissing this very important yet simple fact.

one car that we have yet to see a true dyno sheet for.......One car that doesnt even out with the hundreds of cars that other shops have put out. and im sure we can all be assured that none of those from any of the companies use OEM parts in such strength needed areas
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #156  
Pete@BC's Avatar
Pete@BC
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Florida/Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by overZealous1
if everything was discussed, and the customer did not pay extra for the items, then no harm done.

i do not mean to step on toes, and hope this does not come across that way, cause i have worked with both sharif (over the phone) and scott and respect both of you guys. but the first question is for sharif. when the motor was in the state it was in from the pics, it would have been easy to swap out the bolts, maybe an hour or 2, rather than a potential problem down the road where it could cost the customer 3-4 times the amount or more. i understand the fact of not wanting to get involved with that portion, but in the end it may of been a good descision to benefit the customer down the road.
2nd is for scott. why did you guys not install the upgraded bolts and abit more for hks gaskets? if the customer was not charged for these fine, but i have seen these parts not last on my own motor at about those power levels. i know you have done alot of racing on these motors and possibly more than nearly anyone else, so hopefully you are correct on this one.

again, not trying to put you guys on the spot or **** ya off, but the whole pointing fingers in everyone elses direction and forgetting about the customer and his expectations of the final product he is paying for is BS. the forums have started to become a finger pointing war.
This was sherif suggestion to us. Because a motor from another shop is involved, it gets a bit complicated if something fails. The builder can turn around and blame the shop and so on. I've seen it before. To eliminate that and Scot continuously was asked questions regarding the build. We decided to leave it as the builder had offered and continue with the install.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:28 PM
  #157  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Motormouth
no, show me proof, since you want to state something as FACT, where any RA car is making 1-200whp less than they have stated.

I am not a technical expert to tell you whether or not the engine is up to snuff. I know you are notorious for overbuilding cars. not that it is a terrible thing to do, if for the right reasons.
That's an unreasonable request since it's not possible. And attacking GTM for overbuilding is going O/T. jeez.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:28 PM
  #158  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

Originally Posted by Vegas_Speedster
The fact that Scott stands behind the engine and is willing to warranty and RACE that car speaks volumes. You other so called tuners, get your best car and meet Scott on the track. That's where real racers settle disputes, not on a PC. Let the best build win.
Somebody's bluffing. He knows damn well that motor isn't going to hold up, and that he isn't running OEM stuff in his motor...
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #159  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
Umm... Just because you (and the car owner/customer) think it's resolved, doesn't mean all is right here. You are ignoring the common knowledge and overall consensus here that the OEM parts used in this engine build are very questionable (at best) for the power levels the customer asked for with intentions of race use.
in clearly see the engine being in question ....i dont see the customer being ripped off when he came here and stated he was confortable. ..

did the customer paid enough for the power goals he asked? cause he is obviously not caring on the content o f the engine , which is weird, as long as i handles the power(which is whats in question)...
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #160  
Canadian's Avatar
Canadian
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by Zilvia
one car that we have yet to see a true dyno sheet for.......One car that doesnt even out with the hundreds of cars that other shops have put out. and im sure we can all be assured that none of those from any of the companies use OEM parts in such strength needed areas
I don't need a dyno sheet to know, and its pathetic that you all need proof of a claim that isn't even ground breaking. I've seen the Z in person numerous times. It has won numerous time attack events. Do you think the car with 400whp would win??? Afterall, you guys are claiming all of RA's cars are ~200whp less than anything they say.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 PM.