Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Anyone 03-05 upgrade to a Rev-Up engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #1  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default Anyone 03-05 upgrade to a Rev-Up engine?

Wondering if anyone has put a Rev-Up engine in a "Rev-Down" car?

Id love to move to a HR, or better yet the 37HR... but that is probably a nightmare of electrical obstacles.

Just starting to plan my next move is all.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #2  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

Once a non-rev is fully built, does it really matter? I mean unless you're going in and messing with the cam timing, then the exhaust cam that the non-rev doesn't have would come into play.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 05:27 PM
  #3  
App6MT's Avatar
App6MT
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
Default

.

Last edited by App6MT; Jan 12, 2008 at 05:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #4  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by failsafe306
Once a non-rev is fully built, does it really matter? I mean unless you're going in and messing with the cam timing, then the exhaust cam that the non-rev doesn't have would come into play.
You are right, it doesnt matter a whole lot. I am just considering building another engine, so I figured while I am at it... just an idea.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #5  
IntenseFab's Avatar
IntenseFab
Sponsor
Intense Motorsports
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: In the LAB
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
You are right, it doesnt matter a whole lot. I am just considering building another engine, so I figured while I am at it... just an idea.
It definitely couldn't hurt.. What kind of EMS would you be using, and say you were using a piggy-back style ECU would you use an 07 to control the cam timing to take advantage of it fully?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 08:40 PM
  #6  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

my car has an FCON... i would assume just use the 03 harness and ECU in my car, letting the stock ECU control the intake cams, and then swap to a haltech and have the haltech control the exhaust cams?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #7  
Dynosty's Avatar
Dynosty
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 11
From: Louisville, KY
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
my car has an FCON... i would assume just use the 03 harness and ECU in my car, letting the stock ECU control the intake cams, and then swap to a haltech and have the haltech control the exhaust cams?
That would be no problem, and the Haltech will control the intake cams too
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 10:47 PM
  #8  
IslandZavage's Avatar
IslandZavage
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: South FLA
Default

what about the dual intakes on the hr and 37hr? wouldnt that be an issue if your going from a 03-05 FI car to a new dual intake engine?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #9  
Nexx's Avatar
Nexx
New Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 8
From: DFW
Default

phunk, you've already dumped enough money into the Z as is, can you really justify another 10k to do a swap that might net you another 30whp? nope.... if you really want more power, upgrade the turbos and up the boost and get another 200whp that way. but then again you really want a daily 700+ whp car? 500+ is enough, dont get greedy.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 11:11 PM
  #10  
__jb's Avatar
__jb
Z + Rear Seat
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: St.Pete,FL
Default

Wouldn't you need a RevUp harness and ECU?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2008 | 11:22 PM
  #11  
Zincognito's Avatar
Zincognito
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,793
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

I was thinking the same thing, except my 05 motor is NA. Just the thought of having an HR stroked and sleeved and TT is crazy IMO. im considering it......
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 07:07 AM
  #12  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by IslandZavage
what about the dual intakes on the hr and 37hr? wouldnt that be an issue if your going from a 03-05 FI car to a new dual intake engine?
I would love the HR motor with the dual intakes and countless other changes. But in that situation I am concerned with the compatabililty of it all. With a simple rev-up upgrade, I know there isnt much that is different. With the HR swap, I have no clue - I have never had my hands on a HR car. For all I know the motor mounts, crossmember, trans mounts, etc are all different. I suppose I could custom make mounts or adapters. But there could be a lot more involved, especially in the electronics and wiring.

I mean, I am pretty confident that I could control a Rev Up engine with my stock harness and ECU since so much is the same (with the exception of the exhaust cams, insert haltech here), but I am not sure if anything on the HR is the same. Can the signal to the throttle be spilt and sent to 2 throttles? Is the crank and/or cam signal patterns different? If too much is different, how compatable is the HR harness in a 03-05 car? I suppose I could always meet up with someone with a HR and compare the harness connections... but the HR swap could be potentially intimidating with diminishing return, especially if your talking about going all the way to a 37HR with VVEL
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 07:14 AM
  #13  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
phunk, you've already dumped enough money into the Z as is, can you really justify another 10k to do a swap that might net you another 30whp? nope.... if you really want more power, upgrade the turbos and up the boost and get another 200whp that way. but then again you really want a daily 700+ whp car? 500+ is enough, dont get greedy.
You've got me all wrong!

Its not really about upgrading for more power. My setup is currently capable of quite a bit more... I stopped at the power I had cause thats all I could get out of my 5psi wastegate springs. I am sure my car has a good 100rwhp just waiting for me to tune for a few more psi. As for a 700+ rwhp car... Eh, I am not exactly HP greedy... I have had a powerful Z for a pretty long time and never really cared much to make more power. I dont know if I would go for 700+ even on the next engine unless I go with a different turbo system.. hmm.

For me its more about stuff, quality, technology, etc. I just like having cool ****. The Rev-Up is slightly cooler than a non Rev-Up. Since I am looking at going to 4.0L setup, I dont think it would cost me much more at all, if any at all (aside from a core), to build myself a Rev-Up rather than another 03... may as well.

However, I dont know how likely it is really since I need to pick up a Rev Up entire long block. If I can get a good deal on one, sure... but if I cant get one at a lowballer price, I can just pick up a bare 03 shortblock and get on my way. I am just playing with the idea and was curious if it had been done.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #14  
__jb's Avatar
__jb
Z + Rear Seat
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: St.Pete,FL
Default

A lot of revup engines have the oil consumption problem. Sometimes you can get one pretty cheap.

I think changing to an HR would be much more difficult than changing to a revup. I think the block is taller... so you'd need to account for that in the motor mounts and probably an '07 hood... the wiring and ECU are different compared to the earlier motors... The ECU flash guys are still trying to reverse engineer the HR ECU, so it's not trivial.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #15  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

^+1, but if you can wait, once the HR CAN signal protocols have been decoded, it may be more clear how cost-effective an HR swap would be. If the HR ECU is CAN-compatible with the older BCM and ABS modules, then it might not be too bad. Always tough to be an early adopter...
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #16  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
^+1, but if you can wait, once the HR CAN signal protocols have been decoded, it may be more clear how cost-effective an HR swap would be. If the HR ECU is CAN-compatible with the older BCM and ABS modules, then it might not be too bad. Always tough to be an early adopter...
You guys are solid in your thinking, but!! What about controlling the HR motor with the older harness and ECU. When doing a motor swap, the cleanest way is to try and keep the same harness, extend or shorten any plugs needed, etc... If the crank and cam triggers patterns are the same, the 03 ECU would never know which engine its running.... the problem is then taking control of the added stuff. I have seen some guys try and just split the throttle signal to a pair of TBs... does that really work?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #17  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
You guys are solid in your thinking, but!! What about controlling the HR motor with the older harness and ECU. When doing a motor swap, the cleanest way is to try and keep the same harness, extend or shorten any plugs needed, etc... If the crank and cam triggers patterns are the same, the 03 ECU would never know which engine its running.... the problem is then taking control of the added stuff. I have seen some guys try and just split the throttle signal to a pair of TBs... does that really work?
I believe that it can be done with a signal booster and/or post processor. Correct me if I am wrong but that is the conclusion Crawford came to a while back when they tried it.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #18  
meatbag's Avatar
meatbag
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 27
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
You guys are solid in your thinking, but!! What about controlling the HR motor with the older harness and ECU. When doing a motor swap, the cleanest way is to try and keep the same harness, extend or shorten any plugs needed, etc... If the crank and cam triggers patterns are the same, the 03 ECU would never know which engine its running.... the problem is then taking control of the added stuff. I have seen some guys try and just split the throttle signal to a pair of TBs... does that really work?
Tim at SFR has done this on his car, maybe he can chime in if its not proprietary info.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #19  
rkd350z's Avatar
rkd350z
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

wow big project comming"??
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #20  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

Wouldn't it be easier to just do away with the ECU all together and just rig up a dual throttle cable setup?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:27 PM.