Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Question about 3.8L motors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 02:09 PM
  #141  
GTM's Avatar
GTM
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by thawk408
Would only sleeve an NA motor if I was going 4.2
I agree, best bet would be a non-sleeved 3.8L stroker, cost effective, and awesome response.

-George
GT Motorsports
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #142  
JAM3Z's Avatar
JAM3Z
Thread Starter
Phenom
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenville SC
Default

With some aggressive cams and head work, that would be a very unique setup. If you're looking to set yourself apart from the crowd, that'd be one way to do it.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #143  
__jb's Avatar
__jb
Z + Rear Seat
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: St.Pete,FL
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
just look at some shortblock pictures of a stock VQ35 and some darton sleeved short block pictures and you'll see
Thanks for the pictures.

It looks like the sleeved block has more water jacket passages at the deck of the cylinder block. Is that what you mean by open and closed deck? I don't see how that could be a side effect of putting in sleeves, unless extreme decking of the block is required to shave down the sleeves.

Originally Posted by thawk408
Would only sleeve an NA motor if I was going 4.2
That was my original plan.

It seems like the additional displacement added by the 100mm bore would be really attractive on an NA motor. I didn't realize there were so many negatives.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #144  
JAM3Z's Avatar
JAM3Z
Thread Starter
Phenom
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,638
Likes: 0
From: Greenville SC
Default

Originally Posted by __jb
It seems like the additional displacement added by the 100mm bore would be really attractive on an NA motor. I didn't realize there were so many negatives.
I'm not sure I'd call it negatives, but is a definite increased cost/benefit trade-off as you make more and more elaborate modifications to the car.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 03:20 PM
  #145  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by __jb
Thanks for the pictures.

It looks like the sleeved block has more water jacket passages at the deck of the cylinder block. Is that what you mean by open and closed deck? I don't see how that could be a side effect of putting in sleeves, unless extreme decking of the block is required to shave down the sleeves.
the sleeves don't really have more water passages

the stock one is totally open around the cylinders while the sleeves fill in all that space and then have those little holes going down the sleeves instead of having the whole area available for coolant
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 11:06 PM
  #146  
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan
New Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 467
Likes: 3
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
the sleeves don't really have more water passages

the stock one is totally open around the cylinders while the sleeves fill in all that space and then have those little holes going down the sleeves instead of having the whole area available for coolant
The open deck is closed of at the top by the cylinder head & head gasket with just a few small holes & slots to let the water flow through.
With the Dartron sleeves there is a groove machined in the top that mimics
the open deck & the holes you see drilled in the top line up with the holes in the head gasket & head.
The water flow & capacity is the same OE, the only difference being the flange at the top of the sleeve that makes it a closed deck.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #147  
__jb's Avatar
__jb
Z + Rear Seat
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: St.Pete,FL
Default

Originally Posted by Nathan
The open deck is closed of at the top by the cylinder head & head gasket with just a few small holes & slots to let the water flow through.
With the Dartron sleeves there is a groove machined in the top that mimics
the open deck & the holes you see drilled in the top line up with the holes in the head gasket & head.
The water flow & capacity is the same OE, the only difference being the flange at the top of the sleeve that makes it a closed deck.
I understand the technology, I'm just having trouble with the terminology. So the picture below is a stock, OEM, open deck.



And the picture below is of Darton sleeves that are closed deck.



Seems like the sleeves would keep the cylinder wall straighter and rounder with the extra metal near the top of the cylinder.

Thanks for the help.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 05:32 PM
  #148  
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan
New Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 467
Likes: 3
From: Australia
Default

Originally Posted by __jb
I understand the technology, I'm just having trouble with the terminology. So the picture below is a stock, OEM, open deck.



And the picture below is of Darton sleeves that are closed deck.



Seems like the sleeves would keep the cylinder wall straighter and rounder with the extra metal near the top of the cylinder.

Thanks for the help.
Correct.
Most people, but not all fit the Dartron sleeves so they can bore them out to increase the capacity of the motor. Others feel that the open deck is weakness on an all out FI motor.
The open deck has a thin steel sleeve fitted on the inside of the bore which will only allow about a 20 thou overbore.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 11:04 PM
  #149  
srt4-no more's Avatar
srt4-no more
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: PHX
Default

Originally Posted by George@GTM
I agree, best bet would be a non-sleeved 3.8L stroker, cost effective, and awesome response.

-George
GT Motorsports
So the dyno graph of the 3.8L APS twin's was non-sleeved correct?
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 12:46 AM
  #150  
JETPILOT's Avatar
JETPILOT
New Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 2
From: Vero Beach, FL
Default

Seems like the sleeves would keep the cylinder wall straighter and rounder with the extra metal near the top of the cylinder.
Of course keep in mind for the sleeves to keep the bores straighter and rounder you need to have a problem with them being distorted in the first place. I think it has been proven that there is no need for sleeving the block for less than 600whp.

JET
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 08:23 AM
  #151  
gothchick's Avatar
gothchick
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Default

Has anyone thought through the dampening dynamics of a stroked engine? Even if it's balanced/ blueprinted, it's still going to need dampening for longevity sake.

https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...9&postcount=26

https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/337947-mrc-first-cracked-crankshaft.html
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XM 1
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jul 10, 2022 07:44 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:50 PM.