Question about 3.8L motors
Originally Posted by thawk408
Would only sleeve an NA motor if I was going 4.2
-George
GT Motorsports
Originally Posted by sentry65
just look at some shortblock pictures of a stock VQ35 and some darton sleeved short block pictures and you'll see
It looks like the sleeved block has more water jacket passages at the deck of the cylinder block. Is that what you mean by open and closed deck? I don't see how that could be a side effect of putting in sleeves, unless extreme decking of the block is required to shave down the sleeves.
Originally Posted by thawk408
Would only sleeve an NA motor if I was going 4.2
It seems like the additional displacement added by the 100mm bore would be really attractive on an NA motor. I didn't realize there were so many negatives.
Originally Posted by __jb
It seems like the additional displacement added by the 100mm bore would be really attractive on an NA motor. I didn't realize there were so many negatives.
Originally Posted by __jb
Thanks for the pictures.
It looks like the sleeved block has more water jacket passages at the deck of the cylinder block. Is that what you mean by open and closed deck? I don't see how that could be a side effect of putting in sleeves, unless extreme decking of the block is required to shave down the sleeves.
It looks like the sleeved block has more water jacket passages at the deck of the cylinder block. Is that what you mean by open and closed deck? I don't see how that could be a side effect of putting in sleeves, unless extreme decking of the block is required to shave down the sleeves.
the stock one is totally open around the cylinders while the sleeves fill in all that space and then have those little holes going down the sleeves instead of having the whole area available for coolant
Originally Posted by sentry65
the sleeves don't really have more water passages
the stock one is totally open around the cylinders while the sleeves fill in all that space and then have those little holes going down the sleeves instead of having the whole area available for coolant
the stock one is totally open around the cylinders while the sleeves fill in all that space and then have those little holes going down the sleeves instead of having the whole area available for coolant
With the Dartron sleeves there is a groove machined in the top that mimics
the open deck & the holes you see drilled in the top line up with the holes in the head gasket & head.
The water flow & capacity is the same OE, the only difference being the flange at the top of the sleeve that makes it a closed deck.
Originally Posted by Nathan
The open deck is closed of at the top by the cylinder head & head gasket with just a few small holes & slots to let the water flow through.
With the Dartron sleeves there is a groove machined in the top that mimics
the open deck & the holes you see drilled in the top line up with the holes in the head gasket & head.
The water flow & capacity is the same OE, the only difference being the flange at the top of the sleeve that makes it a closed deck.
With the Dartron sleeves there is a groove machined in the top that mimics
the open deck & the holes you see drilled in the top line up with the holes in the head gasket & head.
The water flow & capacity is the same OE, the only difference being the flange at the top of the sleeve that makes it a closed deck.

And the picture below is of Darton sleeves that are closed deck.

Seems like the sleeves would keep the cylinder wall straighter and rounder with the extra metal near the top of the cylinder.
Thanks for the help.
Originally Posted by __jb
I understand the technology, I'm just having trouble with the terminology. So the picture below is a stock, OEM, open deck.

And the picture below is of Darton sleeves that are closed deck.

Seems like the sleeves would keep the cylinder wall straighter and rounder with the extra metal near the top of the cylinder.
Thanks for the help.

And the picture below is of Darton sleeves that are closed deck.

Seems like the sleeves would keep the cylinder wall straighter and rounder with the extra metal near the top of the cylinder.
Thanks for the help.
Most people, but not all fit the Dartron sleeves so they can bore them out to increase the capacity of the motor. Others feel that the open deck is weakness on an all out FI motor.
The open deck has a thin steel sleeve fitted on the inside of the bore which will only allow about a 20 thou overbore.
Originally Posted by George@GTM
I agree, best bet would be a non-sleeved 3.8L stroker, cost effective, and awesome response.
-George
GT Motorsports
-George
GT Motorsports
Seems like the sleeves would keep the cylinder wall straighter and rounder with the extra metal near the top of the cylinder.
JET
Has anyone thought through the dampening dynamics of a stroked engine? Even if it's balanced/ blueprinted, it's still going to need dampening for longevity sake.
https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...9&postcount=26
https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/337947-mrc-first-cracked-crankshaft.html
https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...9&postcount=26
https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/337947-mrc-first-cracked-crankshaft.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM





