Turbonetics g35 making insane power
Originally Posted by TurboTim
Ideally, you should have done a baseline on that Mustang dyno and then hooked up the meth kit and did your retune and see what you came up with.That way you know what the actual gains were.
+1 on the baseline
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Mustang Dyno's have many different settings that can be played with to alter or skew horsepower numbers.
Dynojet's, atleast the newer ones not sure about older versions, don't have any elevation correction factors etc.. like found on the Mustang Dyno's.
Dynojet's, atleast the newer ones not sure about older versions, don't have any elevation correction factors etc.. like found on the Mustang Dyno's.
i was there for this tune session. the car made 408.X @ 9 psi. and he does have a huge exhaust leak on the up pipe it sounds like **** and u gotta get that **** fixed man lol. the post made in this thrad are pretty ignorant ... lol. hopefuly jack the tuner from hp logic will post the graph to shrink all your e-peeens. once the uppie gets wleded shut hopefuly it can make some more power
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 5
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by HighHeat
i was there for this tune session. the car made 408.X @ 9 psi. and he does have a huge exhaust leak on the up pipe it sounds like **** and u gotta get that **** fixed man lol. the post made in this thrad are pretty ignorant ... lol. hopefuly jack the tuner from hp logic will post the graph to shrink all your e-peeens. once the uppie gets wleded shut hopefuly it can make some more power
Doesn't change the fact that he is claiming a certain HP # from a different dyno, when he has not had his vehicle dyno'd on it.
i never clamed anything ... lol i said should be around 420- to 430. and yes they are dw. mainly because its what the tuner said i would be at because he knows what his dynos numbers put out compared to dyno jets ...
Originally Posted by zcon
i never clamed anything ... lol i said should be around 420- to 430. and yes they are dw. mainly because its what the tuner said i would be at because he knows what his dynos numbers put out compared to dyno jets ...
Originally Posted by zcon
on a mustang dyno i put down 408 WHP @ 9.5 psi
on a dyno jet it should be around 420-430.
BTW this is with a nasty exhaust leak on the up pipe
on a dyno jet it should be around 420-430.
BTW this is with a nasty exhaust leak on the up pipe
, at least admit the nasty exhaust leak(despited the numbers) are BS...you are doing well by blaming this on your tuner for giving you innacurate information, not your fault
You guys are all crazy. So before on a dynojet he had 360 rwhp and now with a retune and more boost he is at 408 rwhp on a mustang dyno. He was told what his hp would APPROXIMATELY be. No wonder more and more people choose not to talk in the FI forum because of the idiotic comments. Nobody can can make 408 on a stock vq at 9psi? Here is a eye opener for all you doubters you can fart and make 400+ with a stock VQ. I make 401 on this same dyno all day long at 8.5 psi and have been doing this for over 2 yrs and 30k. :P
Last edited by captj3; Apr 13, 2008 at 12:02 PM.
Originally Posted by captj3
You guys are all crazy. So before on a dynojet he had 360 rwhp and now with a retune and more boost he is at 408 rwhp on a mustang dyno. He was told what his hp would APPROXIMATELY be. No wonder more and more people choose not to talk in the FI forum because of the idiotic comments. Nobody can can make 408 on a stock vq at 9psi. Here is a eye opener for all you doubters you can fart and make 400+ with a stock VQ. I make 401 on this same dyno all day long at 8.5 psi and have been doing this for over 2 yrs and 30k. :P
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 5
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by captj3
No wonder more and more people choose not to talk in the FI forum because of the idiotic comments. Nobody can can make 408 on a stock vq at 9psi
Here is a dyno chart form a G35 with STOCK BLOCK making 405 @ 6 psi
See what I did.... I made a claim, and post a dyno to back it up.... you should try it
Some of the people that post in the FI section are as knowledgable as anyone in the industry.
so STFU until you know what your talking about
Last edited by SlideFox; Apr 13, 2008 at 08:51 AM.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 5
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by JS04
^^^Not anymore. But they used to.
atleast from what I have been told
Last edited by SlideFox; Apr 13, 2008 at 08:55 AM.
Originally Posted by captj3
You guys are all crazy. So before on a dynojet he had 360 rwhp and now with a retune and more boost he is at 408 rwhp on a mustang dyno. He was told what his hp would APPROXIMATELY be. No wonder more and more people choose not to talk in the FI forum because of the idiotic comments. Nobody can can make 408 on a stock vq at 9psi. Here is a eye opener for all you doubters you can fart and make 400+ with a stock VQ. I make 401 on this same dyno all day long at 8.5 psi and have been doing this for over 2 yrs and 30k. :P
Its not that you cant make 400whp, you have to consider the size of the turbo, engine, and psi ....some kits make 400whp at 6-8 psi but look at the size of the turbo they use...now look at the flow charts of the hifi turbo u have.
Also in your post you mention why he is incorrect: he claimed with a exhaust leak too
That the gains 40whp on a tune(which if true, it makes you wonder on the previous tune) and then add another 10-20whp on top of that on a "rice" correction to approximate dynojet numbers?
he already admitted its not his fault his shop told him so, so maybe incorrect advice...maybe he received an inflated number for "business purposes' who knows really 
as Tim said....the should have done a baselineID be nice to see the boost curve of the run too.
Last edited by IIQuickSilverII; Apr 13, 2008 at 11:45 AM.
i don't know if he printed it out but im going to be replaing the sprak plugs because up top the spark was getting put out cuz the gap is too large. then im going to get the uppipe welded and see what boost it puts me at with out the leak. probly around 10
Originally Posted by IIQuickSilverII
401 hp?
its not that you cant do 400 but becaus eof hte size of the turbo, engine, and psi there i only a certain power you can go....somekit do 400 but look at the turbo they use...now look at the flow charts of the hifi turbo u have.
Also you see in your post the part that he was in correct he claimed with a exhaust leak too tha the gaiges 40whp on a tune(if true, makes you wonder on the preovious one) and then add another10-20whp more on a rice correction to aproximate dynojet numbers? he already admited its not his fault his shop told him so, so maybe incorrect advice...they migth have giving him an inflated numbers for "business purpuses' who knows really as tim said....the should have done a baseline
ID be nice to see theboost curve too
its not that you cant do 400 but becaus eof hte size of the turbo, engine, and psi there i only a certain power you can go....somekit do 400 but look at the turbo they use...now look at the flow charts of the hifi turbo u have.
Also you see in your post the part that he was in correct he claimed with a exhaust leak too
tha the gaiges 40whp on a tune(if true, makes you wonder on the preovious one) and then add another10-20whp more on a rice correction to aproximate dynojet numbers? he already admited its not his fault his shop told him so, so maybe incorrect advice...they migth have giving him an inflated numbers for "business purpuses' who knows really as tim said....the should have done a baselineID be nice to see theboost curve too