Turbonetics g35 making insane power
Originally Posted by RudeG_v2.0
ROFL
Nooo... I'm not paying you if you are going to run more PSI. My comments weren't based on Jeremy's statement which you quoted. You stated that your 408whp tune at 9.4PSI on that Mustang dyno would be about 420-430whp on a dynojet. I have never seen a Turbonetics kit (without nitrous and/or built motor with cams) make that much power at that given PSI.
Bottom line: You make 430whp at 9.4PSI or you FAIL and I won't pay you.
Nooo... I'm not paying you if you are going to run more PSI. My comments weren't based on Jeremy's statement which you quoted. You stated that your 408whp tune at 9.4PSI on that Mustang dyno would be about 420-430whp on a dynojet. I have never seen a Turbonetics kit (without nitrous and/or built motor with cams) make that much power at that given PSI.
Bottom line: You make 430whp at 9.4PSI or you FAIL and I won't pay you.
if u paid any attention to this thread with two holes in the up pipe it made aprox 9.4 psi and the mustang dyno showed 408. the up pipe has been welded shut. the boost controller has not been touched. What ever psi it is at now .. witch i think it is the same i only saw a spike of 10.3 last night... is the same setting it was ran at before. so it should make even more power than before...
i took the 200 $ bet :-) then i asked if u wanted to throw down on the same stipulations, u said 50$, bend the rules as u may i don't want your money.... also you should work on your reading skills, if you paid more attention, your post would seem so ignorant.... i havent said the boost has been increased yet ... lol
Originally Posted by zcon
i think you know ur gonna loose ur money its ok you and ur turd avatar can back the **** out.
How old are you? I hope your car performs better than your sh*t talking abilities. Grow up.
You essentially said that 408whp on that Mustang dyno = 420-430 on a dynojet. Others including myself disagree with your statement and posted to that effect. I will pay you the $50 if you make that power without raising the boost.
I disagree with applying false corrections between dynos, but...
I don't see what's so hard to believe about 420-430whp being a possiblity. He's running water/methanol with a custom tune. My car put down 412~whp on a dynojet here in tampa on a reflash on 9psi. If he's running a more aggressive UTEC tune, water/meth, and maybe higher octane gas, then I could see it happening.
I don't see what's so hard to believe about 420-430whp being a possiblity. He's running water/methanol with a custom tune. My car put down 412~whp on a dynojet here in tampa on a reflash on 9psi. If he's running a more aggressive UTEC tune, water/meth, and maybe higher octane gas, then I could see it happening.
Originally Posted by taurran
I disagree with applying false corrections between dynos, but...
I don't see what's so hard to believe about 420-430whp being a possiblity. He's running water/methanol with a custom tune. My car put down 412~whp on a dynojet here in tampa on a reflash on 9psi. If he's running a more aggressive UTEC tune, water/meth, and maybe higher octane gas, then I could see it happening.
I don't see what's so hard to believe about 420-430whp being a possiblity. He's running water/methanol with a custom tune. My car put down 412~whp on a dynojet here in tampa on a reflash on 9psi. If he's running a more aggressive UTEC tune, water/meth, and maybe higher octane gas, then I could see it happening.
Originally Posted by taurran
I disagree with applying false corrections between dynos, but...
I don't see what's so hard to believe about 420-430whp being a possiblity. He's running water/methanol with a custom tune. My car put down 412~whp on a dynojet here in tampa on a reflash on 9psi. If he's running a more aggressive UTEC tune, water/meth, and maybe higher octane gas, then I could see it happening.
I don't see what's so hard to believe about 420-430whp being a possiblity. He's running water/methanol with a custom tune. My car put down 412~whp on a dynojet here in tampa on a reflash on 9psi. If he's running a more aggressive UTEC tune, water/meth, and maybe higher octane gas, then I could see it happening.
was the fact that he was doing rice math...he wants DJ numbers he needs to take it to ta dyno
Basically if what he said is right... at 9.4psi he shoudl be making actually way more than 420-430 since in his first post he said he even had an nasty exhaust leak.....lets see what he does now 9.4. What ever the result, he will finally be able to say what his DJ numbers really are versus pulling numbers out of his ***.
Last edited by IIQuickSilverII; Apr 23, 2008 at 06:20 AM.
actualy its what my tuner told me... he said when customers tkae their cars to dyno jets in our ares they read around 20 hp higher than his mustang dyno..... nuff said.
Originally Posted by zcon
actualy its what my tuner told me... he said when customers tkae their cars to dyno jets in our ares they read around 20 hp higher than his mustang dyno..... nuff said.
Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
we can also scribble in what we think it would make on a mustang dyno too...
Are you insinuating that the mustang dyno numbers are false and the shop is lying?
Originally Posted by captj3
It's amazing that everyone thinks this is not possible. Approximately was the key word.
Originally Posted by captj3
Are you insinuating that the mustang dyno numbers are false and the shop is lying?
Originally Posted by Black Guy
No he's saying that if you dont input the correct information into a mustang dyno you will not get correct readings.
That's not the way he's coming across with all his posts.