Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

interesting bad built motor thread on G35driver.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #661  
mforrest100's Avatar
mforrest100
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by discom
I think what he meant is motor built by MRC, installed by MRC and tuned by MRC.

That way, there will be no question of who is liable if motor is no good.
That is exactly what I meant. Sorry I was not more clear Doug.
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #662  
mforrest100's Avatar
mforrest100
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by doug
As i said.. isn't that the same with the turbo kit?

the point is Rome went 1 place for all his stuff.. he has 1 single point of contact.. if GTM wasn't on the boards Rome wouldn't have had any contact with GTM at all..

if something goes wrong with your turbo.. who do you go to? the Greddy Authorize Dealer or Greddy? something wrong with your F-Con... you go to HKS or your Authorize Dealer? You guys keep forgetting almost all the aftermarket parts in your car is from another manufacturer.. GTM just happens to be on the board.. and Rome knows Sam... the fact Rome bought his motor from MRC and not GTM directly means he really shouldn't even have been speaking to GTM
I understand what you are saying but I think you are comparing apples to oranges. When we speak of a motor, I would agree with you if we were saying that the part's for Rome's motor were purchased from Sam and Julian did the assembly, but in this case the motor was built by Sam and installed by Julian which could leave two different shops liable for why the motor may not be running correctly....one part on the assembly.....the other part on the installation and startup/tune. I think your turbo example would be more related to my point if were saying that turbo's were sent out in pieces and assembled in the shop. Then its a possibility that the shop could be held liable. But since the turbo is assembled at Greddy (for example) this is why Greddy is held liable if there were an issues with the turbo.

Plain and simple.....when I say one shop, I mean that the motor was assembled and installed at that shop, turbo kit purchased and installed at that shop, and the tune done at that shop.

Edit.... After reading a couple of posts after Doug's I definitely see his point. I still think that the best approach is to go with a shop that builds there engines in house, but when I look at the Cosworth example brought up, Doug is right when he says that most other engine builders are not on the forums which is why we could not have direct contact. So when you think about it like that.....you basically did do everything at one shop. If there was an issue with the motor, you would go back to the shop that did your install and tune and they would contact the manufacturer.

Last edited by mforrest100; Oct 30, 2008 at 10:07 PM.
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #663  
SlideFox's Avatar
SlideFox
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 5
From: Arizona
Default

This thread is comical....
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 10:23 PM
  #664  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

I wonder if there was any progress today on getting this worked out/resolved to get r0mey back on the road with a healthy motor ASAP. I just hope some pride gets swallowed and they don't dick around getting this resolved for him.

Any update for us r0me?

Last edited by RudeG_v2.0; Oct 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 12:10 AM
  #665  
redlude97's Avatar
redlude97
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,754
Likes: 0
From: Seattle/Portland
Default

if you buy a camera from bestbuy, and it fails and needs to be warrantied, do you take it back to best buy or do you have to contact the manufacturer?
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 12:13 AM
  #666  
Hoooper's Avatar
Hoooper
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by redlude97
if you buy a camera from bestbuy, and it fails and needs to be warrantied, do you take it back to best buy or do you have to contact the manufacturer?
did bestbuy install the battery, card and set up the whole thing for you? if so take it to bestbuy
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 04:51 AM
  #667  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

I brought up warranty questions in the G35driver thread and I was labeled as a "biased a-hole with an ajenda" and was told to stfu.

However, the reality is that when businesses do business with other businesses warranty contracts are VERY important as the goal is to make and keep customers happy and to prevent things like this from happening. As far as I could tell there was no warranty contract between the two shops, and no one ever posted the extent of the "warranty" beyond the post by Sam that stated incidentals are NOT covered (no surprise there, that is standard).

My personal stance on it is if MRC sold a customer a GTM motor for any of these reasons:
1. they have a profit margin
2. They have a quicker turn around time
3. They truely believe they are the best motor for the build

Then MRC should handle all warranty details and stand behind the product they sold. This, however, does NOT mean they should cover incidentals, but perhaps offer a discounted rate (in which they did). I would never work for free and I wouldn't expect a shop to work for free on my car.

However, if the customer demands (or purchases on his own) a GTM motor then MRC would basically be off the hook, as the customer is the one who wanted the GTM motor. I guess what I'm trying to say is if MRC "sold" the motor to the customer then they should stand behind it - if the customer spec'd the motor himself then it would crazy to expect MRC to stand behind it.

This also brings up the topic of customers knowing exactly what they are getting in to. Of course you want to have optimism going in to a new build and don't want to talk about disaster but it would be a good idea to talk to the shop owner you are working with and understand what they are willing to do for you if there should be a problem.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 04:55 AM
  #668  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Another GTM story and issues.......

http://g35driver.com/forums/tech-07-...ng-gtm-34.html
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 05:04 AM
  #669  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

True to a point. They should only cover te motor if they can get it warrantied from the manufacture of the motor itself. Running a business also does not mean losing a ton of money for something that isn't your problem. Yes help the customer, but you also need to make sure you can get reimbursed or get replacements for the defective parts.

Like some have explained, if you purchase a Stillen SC kit from let's say GTM, and they install it and you are off. You then have some serious problems down the road, you would expect GTM to fix it right? Of course they will help but they can't do anything without getting replacement parts under warranty from Stillen.

Originally Posted by KPierson
I brought up warranty questions in the G35driver thread and I was labeled as a "biased a-hole with an ajenda" and was told to stfu.

However, the reality is that when businesses do business with other businesses warranty contracts are VERY important as the goal is to make and keep customers happy and to prevent things like this from happening. As far as I could tell there was no warranty contract between the two shops, and no one ever posted the extent of the "warranty" beyond the post by Sam that stated incidentals are NOT covered (no surprise there, that is standard).

My personal stance on it is if MRC sold a customer a GTM motor for any of these reasons:
1. they have a profit margin
2. They have a quicker turn around time
3. They truely believe they are the best motor for the build

Then MRC should handle all warranty details and stand behind the product they sold. This, however, does NOT mean they should cover incidentals, but perhaps offer a discounted rate (in which they did). I would never work for free and I wouldn't expect a shop to work for free on my car.

However, if the customer demands (or purchases on his own) a GTM motor then MRC would basically be off the hook, as the customer is the one who wanted the GTM motor. I guess what I'm trying to say is if MRC "sold" the motor to the customer then they should stand behind it - if the customer spec'd the motor himself then it would crazy to expect MRC to stand behind it.

This also brings up the topic of customers knowing exactly what they are getting in to. Of course you want to have optimism going in to a new build and don't want to talk about disaster but it would be a good idea to talk to the shop owner you are working with and understand what they are willing to do for you if there should be a problem.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 05:15 AM
  #670  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by chris'smax
ok if we really must play this game then i say z1auto. To my knowledge it is z1 autos responsibility to sort out the warranty w/ the manufacturer. In fact i just experienced this. I thought i was potentially having a problem w/ my FCON. In order to go through the warranty process i would have gone through Forged Performance because they were authorized HKS dealers.

The reason i say this question is dumb is because in this scenario (same thing that has happened here before) everyone is left pointing fingers. What exactly is it you are trying to get at w/ this question?
so had Forged or PF still be using GTM motors.. what would you do when you wanted to get your build motor project done?
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 05:16 AM
  #671  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by mforrest100
Edit.... After reading a couple of posts after Doug's I definitely see his point. I still think that the best approach is to go with a shop that builds there engines in house, but when I look at the Cosworth example brought up, Doug is right when he says that most other engine builders are not on the forums which is why we could not have direct contact. So when you think about it like that.....you basically did do everything at one shop. If there was an issue with the motor, you would go back to the shop that did your install and tune and they would contact the manufacturer.
exactly..
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 05:21 AM
  #672  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
True to a point. They should only cover te motor if they can get it warrantied from the manufacture of the motor itself. Running a business also does not mean losing a ton of money for something that isn't your problem. Yes help the customer, but you also need to make sure you can get reimbursed or get replacements for the defective parts.

Like some have explained, if you purchase a Stillen SC kit from let's say GTM, and they install it and you are off. You then have some serious problems down the road, you would expect GTM to fix it right? Of course they will help but they can't do anything without getting replacement parts under warranty from Stillen.
if you are dealing with a middle man.. you don't go to the direct source.. sure GTM would have to get the parts from Stillen and replace whats broken.. but thats between GTM and Stillen .. not you..

if you buy a Stillen SC from GTM who is an authorized dealer and it becomes defective through a flaw in the design.. you take it back to GTM and then GTM recoups the money on parts, shipping and labor from Stillen.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 05:29 AM
  #673  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
True to a point. They should only cover te motor if they can get it warrantied from the manufacture of the motor itself. Running a business also does not mean losing a ton of money for something that isn't your problem. Yes help the customer, but you also need to make sure you can get reimbursed or get replacements for the defective parts.

Like some have explained, if you purchase a Stillen SC kit from let's say GTM, and they install it and you are off. You then have some serious problems down the road, you would expect GTM to fix it right? Of course they will help but they can't do anything without getting replacement parts under warranty from Stillen.
That's exactly what I meant by "covering all the warranty details". I wouldn't expect MRC to provide the parts, I would expect them to work with the manufacturer to get the issues resolved.

I wouldn't expect them to lose any money, that is why I would expect to pay the incidentals out of pocket (engine removal, shipping, etc). I would expect a discounted labor rate though!

I think we are saying the exact same thing, just using different words.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 05:45 AM
  #674  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Originally Posted by doug
if you are dealing with a middle man.. you don't go to the direct source.. sure GTM would have to get the parts from Stillen and replace whats broken.. but thats between GTM and Stillen .. not you..

if you buy a Stillen SC from GTM who is an authorized dealer and it becomes defective through a flaw in the design.. you take it back to GTM and then GTM recoups the money on parts, shipping and labor from Stillen.
Which in turn is what MRC is trying to do with teh engine problems and GTM won't do it.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 05:46 AM
  #675  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
That's exactly what I meant by "covering all the warranty details". I wouldn't expect MRC to provide the parts, I would expect them to work with the manufacturer to get the issues resolved.

I wouldn't expect them to lose any money, that is why I would expect to pay the incidentals out of pocket (engine removal, shipping, etc). I would expect a discounted labor rate though!

I think we are saying the exact same thing, just using different words.

Sounds that way!
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 06:16 AM
  #676  
chris'smax's Avatar
chris'smax
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: On dicks
Default

Originally Posted by doug
so had Forged or PF still be using GTM motors.. what would you do when you wanted to get your build motor project done?
i would have tried to find a place that built the motors in house. Honestly i have had friends go through the same situation rome is going through and all it ended up being was a finger pointing game.

I will say this, if i had gone to forged and purchased a gtm motor through them and had them tune the car i would have expected the warranty to be covered through forged. They are the ones who i feel would be responsible for handling the warranty claim.

I can't speak for Sharif nor do i know his reasoning, but i feel that his reason for building his own motors now instead of sourcing motors was to avoid the same situation we are seeing in this thread.

Last edited by chris'smax; Oct 31, 2008 at 06:24 AM.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 06:26 AM
  #677  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by chris'smax
i would have tried to find a place that built the motors in house. Honestly i have had friends go through the same situation rome is going through and all it ended up being was a finger pointing game.

I will say this, if i had gone to forged and purchased a gtm motor through them and had them tune the car i would have expected the warranty to be covered through forged. They are the ones who i feel would be responsible for handling the warranty claim.

I can't speak for Sharif nor do i know his reasoning, but i feel that his reason for building his own motors now instead of sourcing GTM motors was to avoid the same situation we are seeing in this thread.
+1 on what you said. I told Sharif I felt he was the person who I needed to deal with to get back on the road or doing any kind of warranty issues, because I bought the GTM motor through him, I paid him not GTM. It was a hard place for Sharif, none of his options were good. Either send the motor back to GTM, which he didnt do likely because he knew it would cost me shipping, tons of time and headaches, we all see how GTM can "smoke & mirror" there way out of anything. The other option was he himself help me get back on the road-essentially taking a hit to help me, which he did! For that I am grateful, Sharif is a standup guy, Im glad he was upfront with me and didnt waste my time with GTM....on the other hand, if GTM wasnt so big headed and perfect all the time, perhaps going to htem would have been a legit option and they would have stepped up and covered the block that loved to spit metals out every oil change, but no proof is good enough for Sam to step up 100% without pointing fingers as we can see here. In the end, Sharif helped me, GTM wasnt even an option for me, and I ended up paying for 2 builds-discount or not this $hit isn cheap.

Im still hearing crickets btw in regards to what I brought up this thread.
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 06:30 AM
  #678  
IIQuickSilverII's Avatar
IIQuickSilverII
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,613
Likes: 215
From: Arizona -InP-
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Im still hearing crickets btw in regards to what I brought up this thread.
+1
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 06:40 AM
  #679  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
Which in turn is what MRC is trying to do with teh engine problems and GTM won't do it.
Originally Posted by chris'smax
i would have tried to find a place that built the motors in house. Honestly i have had friends go through the same situation rome is going through and all it ended up being was a finger pointing game.

I will say this, if i had gone to forged and purchased a gtm motor through them and had them tune the car i would have expected the warranty to be covered through forged. They are the ones who i feel would be responsible for handling the warranty claim.

I can't speak for Sharif nor do i know his reasoning, but i feel that his reason for building his own motors now instead of sourcing motors was to avoid the same situation we are seeing in this thread.
i'm not concerned about MRC or GTM .. i have no bias or problems with either one..

what i am concerned about is Rome.. you guys are trying to indicate that Rome could have avoided problems if he went to 1 place to do all his work.. and in fact he did.. he wanted a turbo kit with a built motor and other goodies... he went to 1 shop.. MRC .. its really not Rome's fault if something breaks in the proccess .. he can only go to 1 place.. My Motor and Rome's motor were ordered at the same time.. so i can tell you for a FACT Rome didn't say what motor he wanted.. it was a whole package deal.. so i guess if the Boost Controller Breaks, Clutch Breaks, Motor Breaks and Turbo Kit breaks Rome is suppose to call HKS, Clutchmasters, GTM and Greddy?

come on guys.. get real
Old Oct 31, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #680  
06Track's Avatar
06Track
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Tims Ford Lake TN
Default

I agree Bert, and that was a bad situation for both you and Sharif, but in
the end it was taken care of professionally by Forged. That says alot to me
about their reputation.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 AM.