Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

REV-UP VORTECH #'s (455 whp 400 wtq).

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2009, 08:31 AM
  #1  
JET MECH
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JET MECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: las vegas
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default REV-UP VORTECH #'s (455 whp 400 wtq).

We had a weekend z club meet at L.E.P performance here in las vegas which included a dyno day. well i decided to throw the z up on the dyno and see what it would put down since the last time i dynoed the z was two years ago at GTM. The mod's that i have done since my last dyno/tune session at GTM 2years ago are as follows.

1.removed kinetix 2.25" HF cats, installed APS 2.5" test pipes
2.removed custom 2.5" dual exhaust system, installed fast intensions intimidator 2.5" dual exhaust system
3. removed Si-trim vortech impeller and reinstalled the Sc-trim impeller
4. reconfigured my crank case ventilation system to atmosphere rather than to the intake side of the supercharger system/negitive pressure side. " both catch cans are vented to atmosphere".

a/f ratios looked satisfactory at around 11.5 to 12.0 on my wide band. timing was left conservative from my last tune that Sam did.

the results were 455 RWHP 399.8 RWTQ DJ numbers.( PREVIOUS NUMBERS 430 RWHP 390 RWTQ on GTM DJ ) . i will post up a copy of the dyno graph later when i get back to the house due to i do not have a copy here at work. remember this is a rev-up vortech system that i converted to a non revup cog system. 32 j/s cog, 28 s/c cog 2.87 serp pulley.
here is one pic of the z on the dyno.
Attached Thumbnails REV-UP VORTECH #'s (455 whp 400 wtq).-350z-dyno-pic.jpg   REV-UP VORTECH #'s (455 whp 400 wtq).-img_0199.jpg   REV-UP VORTECH #'s (455 whp 400 wtq).-dynojet.jpg  

Last edited by JET MECH; 11-25-2009 at 10:54 PM.
Old 11-23-2009, 09:16 AM
  #2  
350Z400rwhp
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
350Z400rwhp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Columbus
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very Nice!
Old 11-23-2009, 09:20 AM
  #3  
350z006
New Member
iTrader: (79)
 
350z006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,468
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Hmmmm...so either the test pipes freed up quite a bit of power, or the SC trim is better than the SI trim

Originally Posted by JET MECH
We had a weekend z club meet at L.E.P performance here in las vegas which included a dyno day. well i decided to throw the z up on the dyno and see what it would put down since the last time i dynoed the z was two years ago at GTM. The mod's that i have done since my last dyno/tune session at GTM 2years ago are as follows.

1.removed kinetix 2.25" HF cats, installed APS 2.5" test pipes
2.removed custom 2.5" dual exhaust system, installed fast intensions intimidator 2.5" dual exhaust system
3. removed Si-trim vortech impeller and reinstalled the Sc-trim impeller
4. reconfigured my crank case ventilation system to atmosphere rather than to the intake side of the supercharger system/low pressure side. " both catch cans are vented to atmosphere".

a/f ratios looked satisfactory at around 11.5 to 12.0 on my wide band. timing was left conservative from my last tune that Sam did.

the results were 455 RWHP 399.8 RWTQ DJ numbers.( PREVIOUS NUMBERS 430 RWHP 390 RWTQ on GTM DJ ) . i will post up a copy of the dyno graph later when i get back to the house due to i do not have a copy here at work. remember this is a rev-up vortech system that i converted to a non revup cog system. 32 j/ cog, 28 s/c cog 2.87 serp pulley.
here is one pic of the z on the dyno.
Old 11-23-2009, 09:28 AM
  #4  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

my si makes 457/405 on a dynodynamics so its not the impeller

I'm sure Vegas being in the 60's also helped some as well

thats great news the car is running great Jet! very consistent

Last edited by str8dum1; 11-23-2009 at 09:31 AM.
Old 11-23-2009, 09:30 AM
  #5  
JET MECH
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JET MECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: las vegas
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Last time i dynoed and tuned at GTM with the Si-trim Sam told me that the boost numbers were higher with the Si-trim impeller but my AIT#'s were quite a bit higher as well. Sam instructed me back then that he felt the Sc-trim would be a better choice to go back to due to he has seen lower AIT's with Sc impeller versus the Si-trim. looks like he was right...........i am sure if i had a larger intercooler and water meth injection the Si-trim would have been better for more overall power. BTW i only burn 100 octane fuel with this setup. i want to go with watermeth eventually.
Old 11-23-2009, 09:58 AM
  #6  
JET MECH
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JET MECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: las vegas
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
my si makes 457/405 on a dynodynamics so its not the impeller

I'm sure Vegas being in the 60's also helped some as well

thats great news the car is running great Jet! very consistent
yes it was nice and cool!!! that helped as well. i can't remember what the ambient temps were in cali two years ago but i do remember it being cold as hell due to Sam had to loan me a sweat shirt. i was freezing my *** off around midnight when we were performing some of the final tuning.

Last edited by JET MECH; 11-25-2009 at 03:02 PM.
Old 11-25-2009, 02:58 PM
  #7  
JET MECH
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JET MECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: las vegas
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

dyno graph posted.
Old 11-25-2009, 03:08 PM
  #8  
cdoxp800
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
cdoxp800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Very Nice Jet.. I have been looking a the V3 system for my RevUp.
I had also seen your setup on the Vortech FAQ: read this before asking Vortech questions thread. Now you gone an made it even better. I am really liking your Tq numbers.
Old 11-25-2009, 03:30 PM
  #9  
JET MECH
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JET MECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: las vegas
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cdoxp800
Very Nice Jet.. I have been looking a the V3 system for my RevUp.
I had also seen your setup on the Vortech FAQ: read this before asking Vortech questions thread. Now you gone an made it even better. I am really liking your Tq numbers.
Thanks, the key to making the higher TQ numbers on the rev-up kit is the conversion to the non rev-up cog system. 32/28, 2.87serp instead of the 34/32.
Old 11-25-2009, 03:36 PM
  #10  
cdoxp800
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
cdoxp800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JET MECH
Thanks, the key to making the higher TQ numbers on the rev-up kit is the conversion to the non rev-up cog system. 32/28, 2.87serp instead of the 34/32.
Yea. After reading the whole "Vortech FAQ: read this thread before asking Vortech questions" thread that's what I got out of it. Your setup is the best I have seen to date. I maybe calling GTM about my V3 Kit and Osiris tune for it. I live in FL so It's going to be a self install thing.

Last edited by cdoxp800; 11-25-2009 at 03:42 PM.
Old 11-25-2009, 05:56 PM
  #11  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

u missed mine
https://my350z.com/forum/forced-indu...e-so-high.html

and to be topped by
https://my350z.com/forum/forced-indu...ake-power.html

unless you meant on a rev-up in which case Jet prolyl has the most R&D time to get it just right by far!

Last edited by str8dum1; 11-25-2009 at 05:57 PM.
Old 11-25-2009, 06:49 PM
  #12  
JET MECH
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JET MECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: las vegas
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i guess i may have the record for the highest HP/TQ figures for a rev-up vortech kit. anybody know?
Old 11-25-2009, 07:37 PM
  #13  
JET MECH
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JET MECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: las vegas
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

next will be built short block " just started disassembling my spare engine for my build" 9.5:1 compression,stock heads and cams, T-trim head unit, larger IC, water/meth injection with 100 to 150 shot of nitrous for good measure when needed.

Last edited by JET MECH; 11-26-2009 at 06:54 AM.
Old 11-25-2009, 07:42 PM
  #14  
cdoxp800
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
cdoxp800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JET MECH
i guess i may have the record for the highest HP/TQ figures for a rev-up vortech kit. anybody know?
Most differently
Old 11-25-2009, 08:30 PM
  #15  
350ztxn
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
350ztxn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow nice numbers
Old 11-25-2009, 08:30 PM
  #16  
350z006
New Member
iTrader: (79)
 
350z006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,468
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I don't remember, but did you try the 34/28 combo?

Originally Posted by JET MECH
Thanks, the key to making the higher TQ numbers on the rev-up kit is the conversion to the non rev-up cog system. 32/28, 2.87serp instead of the 34/32.
Old 11-25-2009, 08:38 PM
  #17  
Ztouring04
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Ztouring04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: My garage
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

very very niceee
Old 11-25-2009, 09:19 PM
  #18  
350z006
New Member
iTrader: (79)
 
350z006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,468
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Nevermind, I re-read your SI trim thread and you never tried the 2.87 34/28 combo...I wonder if there would be mechanical issues (ie breaking the cog belt) with the 34/28 2.87 combo...

Originally Posted by 350z006
I don't remember, but did you try the 34/28 combo?
Old 03-11-2010, 06:15 PM
  #19  
whitez33350ztt
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
whitez33350ztt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: new jersey
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

great numbers.. i have a non rev with full bolt ons cams,, walbro 255 and 600cc injectors.. with the 3.33 on a dynojet i ran outta voltage at 5800 rpm and made 377whp.. and 310 tq i gotta go back and tune with a bigger maf. maybe hit 400!!http://www.youtube.com/user/akkshun0.../1/KBBD3X0lMyY thats the pull
Old 03-11-2010, 08:16 PM
  #20  
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
phunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: West Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

car looks great, runs great too!


Quick Reply: REV-UP VORTECH #'s (455 whp 400 wtq).



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 AM.