Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

turbo or NA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2011 | 01:19 AM
  #1  
mgrotel's Avatar
mgrotel
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default turbo or NA?

i searched, but most of the results seemed to be boosted stock blocks, which is a little scary since stock compression is 10.3:1. so, im making my own thread, plus its late, ive been working out in the garage and im tired and want to sleep. easier to post this. anyway, a #4 valve is pretty much screwed so im either goin NA or single turbo. looking for advice on what to do for a RELIABLE autocross/street car, if i go turbo, plans would be:

8.5:1 compression
15lbs of boost (about)
target of 400hp
engine built to handle 600hp
conservative tuning

seems like turbo kits added to stock blocks put 8-9lbs on 10.3:1 compression, so maybe 15lbs on 8.5:1 would be conservative to start with.

thoughts?
Old 02-11-2011 | 01:41 AM
  #2  
mgrotel's Avatar
mgrotel
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

basically im asking if that boost setup will be reliable and last 100k miles or if to get that reliability ill need to stick with a 270hp na build
Old 02-11-2011 | 03:15 AM
  #3  
djtimodj's Avatar
djtimodj
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 908
Likes: 5
From: UK
Default

Go NA mate for reliability. FI for power.
Old 02-11-2011 | 04:20 AM
  #4  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by mgrotel
15lbs of boost (about)
target of 400hp

seems like turbo kits added to stock blocks put 8-9lbs on 10.3:1 compression, so maybe 15lbs on 8.5:1 would be conservative to start with.

thoughts?
You wont need 15psi to make 400rwhp, more like 8-10 even with low compression

But read this thread https://my350z.com/forum/forced-indu...-worth-it.html
Old 02-11-2011 | 05:15 AM
  #5  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

+1

At 400 whp, a properly built engine should hold up for a while. For that HP level, I would look at a twin turbo kit with small turbos for fast spoolup and a broad torque curve. GT25 turbos should be able to get you to 400 whp, and should spoolup very quick. For some headroom for more hp, you could go with GT28 turbos, but they won't spoolup as quick as the GT25s.
Old 02-11-2011 | 07:51 AM
  #6  
mgrotel's Avatar
mgrotel
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

Originally Posted by rh_334
You wont need 15psi to make 400rwhp, more like 8-10 even with low compression

But read this thread https://my350z.com/forum/forced-indu...-worth-it.html
i already read that, but it doesnt talk much about what compression in that thread, which leads me to believe most where on stock compression. i wouldnt expect a 10.3:1 motor to last long on boost. 8.5:1 would be a different story, or thats what i was thinking anyway. so by the thread reference, im guessing you vote NA?
Old 02-11-2011 | 07:53 AM
  #7  
mgrotel's Avatar
mgrotel
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

Originally Posted by ttg35fort
+1

At 400 whp, a properly built engine should hold up for a while. For that HP level, I would look at a twin turbo kit with small turbos for fast spoolup and a broad torque curve. GT25 turbos should be able to get you to 400 whp, and should spoolup very quick. For some headroom for more hp, you could go with GT28 turbos, but they won't spoolup as quick as the GT25s.
could i not achieve the quick spoolup and broad torque with a properly planned single turbo setup? from my limited turbo knowledge, i thought that was possible. a single will be much easier to build. i would be doing custom tubing for the turbo kit is i go that route.
Old 02-11-2011 | 07:56 AM
  #8  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by mgrotel
i already read that, but it doesnt talk much about what compression in that thread, which leads me to believe most where on stock compression. i wouldnt expect a 10.3:1 motor to last long on boost. 8.5:1 would be a different story, or thats what i was thinking anyway. so by the thread reference, im guessing you vote NA?

Compression does not have all that much to do with reliability. You will find guys wit 4 cylinder Hondas boosting 25psi all day, with a 12:1 CR built motor.

Key word here being built.

Tuning is also crucial.
Old 02-11-2011 | 07:59 AM
  #9  
mgrotel's Avatar
mgrotel
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

i would build it for 600, but shoot for 400. sounds like NA is the way to go for me
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:10 AM
  #10  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by mgrotel
i already read that, but it doesnt talk much about what compression in that thread, which leads me to believe most where on stock compression. i wouldnt expect a 10.3:1 motor to last long on boost. 8.5:1 would be a different story, or thats what i was thinking anyway. so by the thread reference, im guessing you vote NA?
No, most boost builds are 8.5-9.0:1 Compression. But based on your goals i would say NA, maybe even high compression NA w/spray. If tuned properly that can be just as (if not more) reliable than boost, and ALOT cheaper.
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:11 AM
  #11  
silvertouringz's Avatar
silvertouringz
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 648
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Default

build an NA beast man!! i love my NA beast...
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:12 AM
  #12  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
Compression does not have all that much to do with reliability. You will find guys wit 4 cylinder Hondas boosting 25psi all day, with a 12:1 CR built motor.
You can't compare Honda builds to VQ builds, inline 4cyl and V6s are totally different worlds when it comes to tuning/boost.
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:20 AM
  #13  
ace32x's Avatar
ace32x
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
From: puyallup WA
Default

na build isnt really cheaper than fi, with all the builds ive seen out there to achieve 320+ whp they seem to drop a good fair amount more than some one doing a bottom end build and a single or twin set up, maybe i am mistaken though but a full NA build seems to be more costly
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:21 AM
  #14  
ace32x's Avatar
ace32x
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
From: puyallup WA
Default

Originally Posted by mgrotel
i searched, but most of the results seemed to be boosted stock blocks, which is a little scary since stock compression is 10.3:1. so, im making my own thread, plus its late, ive been working out in the garage and im tired and want to sleep. easier to post this. anyway, a #4 valve is pretty much screwed so im either goin NA or single turbo. looking for advice on what to do for a RELIABLE autocross/street car, if i go turbo, plans would be:

8.5:1 compression
15lbs of boost (about)
target of 400hp
engine built to handle 600hp
conservative tuning

seems like turbo kits added to stock blocks put 8-9lbs on 10.3:1 compression, so maybe 15lbs on 8.5:1 would be conservative to start with.

thoughts?
and depending on your track you might want to be N/A anyways those long high rpm straightaways where your on it in 5th 6th seem to not fair to well on boosted vq's, like road Atlanta for example
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:23 AM
  #15  
mgrotel's Avatar
mgrotel
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

Originally Posted by ace32x
na build isnt really cheaper than fi, with all the builds ive seen out there to achieve 320+ whp they seem to drop a good fair amount more than some one doing a bottom end build and a single or twin set up, maybe i am mistaken though but a full NA build seems to be more costly
NA builds can be done fairly reasonable, all i would really upgrade would be the pistons, rods, cams, springs. then bump the rev limit a tad. i would do the same with a turbo, but i would have the added cost of the turbo setup, plus a lot more work
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:26 AM
  #16  
thatv35guy's Avatar
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 59
From: Gilbert, AZ
Smile

I just bent a rod in my stock block, single turbo G35 Coupe… AND I’m still glad I went Forced Induction over a built Naturally Aspirated engine that still would’ve been running right now.
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:28 AM
  #17  
mgrotel's Avatar
mgrotel
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

Originally Posted by rh_334
No, most boost builds are 8.5-9.0:1 Compression. But based on your goals i would say NA, maybe even high compression NA w/spray. If tuned properly that can be just as (if not more) reliable than boost, and ALOT cheaper.
haha, funny you say that. spray is what lead to my messed up valve. ive got thousands of $ into my nit setup, utec, lc1, a/f reader, bottle heater, warmer, remote guage, opener, etc. but, i still melted a plug and part of it either damaged the valve or arcwelded itself to the valve so it wont seat. either say, if im building a nit engine, it will be less than 10.3:1 compression. and to be honest, i dont want to mess up a brand new engine so i decided to scrap the whole nit idea and sell the kit anyway. that way i could safely go up to 11:1 in compression. but then i was thinking because im an 4500ft elevation, a turbo makes a lot of sense, so here i am
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:30 AM
  #18  
mgrotel's Avatar
mgrotel
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

idk what to do
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:36 AM
  #19  
erichsherrill's Avatar
erichsherrill
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey / NOVA
Default

i think u will regret NA build.. if ur prepared to drop the doe then i would go built and boosted.. look for built block by one of the vendors.. and u might want to upgrade a few more things then what you listed.. and if your tracking this u might want to moly coat internals aswell as a few cooling support mods.. your lookg at 15k but im sure your aware of that
Old 02-11-2011 | 08:38 AM
  #20  
thatv35guy's Avatar
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 59
From: Gilbert, AZ
Smile

Originally Posted by mgrotel
idk what to do
LS2 Swap </thread>



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:26 AM.