Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

2.5 or 3" exhaust... loss in hp or backpressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2005 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
DRFTR's Avatar
DRFTR
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Laurel, MD
Default 2.5 or 3" exhaust... loss in hp or backpressure

I am in the beginning stages of modding my 03' track... and found a true dual custom HKS carbon/ ti exhaust in both 2.5" and 3" piping... i will eventually add some form of FI on the car and am wondering if i will have a loss in power if i add the 3" exhaust now... knowing that i will eventually need it after the FI is added... ????????
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2005 | 01:11 PM
  #2  
03_Track_Z's Avatar
03_Track_Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

while still N/A you will definately lose some power, but IMO it will be worth it later on when you do FI, because you will REALLY regret it then if you only have 2.5" piping... just my opinion
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #3  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

We have 171 posts about “backpressure.” From those posts, do you get a sense that backpressure is needed, or that its a myth?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 01:50 PM
  #4  
HarvesterUT's Avatar
HarvesterUT
Premier Member
Premier Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 0
From: Houston and Austin, TX
Default

from what i can gather about backpressure, the less you have, the more "free flowing" the engine is....especially up-top. hence, you usually see better HP numbers close to redline, but you "sacarifice" TQ down low.......
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #5  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Increased back pressure results in more midrange trq...but less trq and power up top. This decision should be easy for you. If you have any plans to run a TT setup in the near future, go straight to the 3 inch exhuast, and save yourself some money. Learn from the mistakes of those that have traveled this path before.

We are now dealers of SFR product, and offer their 3 inch true dual SS bolt on exhaust system with HKS SS Ti tip mufflers for $1595 shipped.

Last edited by Sharif@Forged; Nov 20, 2005 at 01:58 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #6  
Vamos_Rafael's Avatar
Vamos_Rafael
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
From: Villanova University
Default

i'd go with 3inch
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 02:21 PM
  #7  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 03_Track_Z
while still N/A you will definately lose some power
not true
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 12:41 PM
  #8  
DRFTR's Avatar
DRFTR
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Laurel, MD
Default

thanks... yeah.. after just buying a new townhouse the $$$$ is limited... however i'm a MOD junky so I had to begin somewhere... for the time being... i'm probably gonna get some headers and test pipes from a friend thats getting rid of his... and run it with the 3" dual... Sharif i actually talked to you about getting that HKS true dual.. i'm the one with the friends in Team EMOTION... yeah if you can get me the SFR exhaust with HKS carbon/Ti cans i'm lookin into it... now that the REAL HKS is ridiculously backordered.. thanks for all your help guys
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 10:43 PM
  #9  
03_Track_Z's Avatar
03_Track_Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Zexy, good call, i should have said

" while still N/A, you will definately lose some power with 3" vs. 2.5" "

You'll see gains either way though
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #10  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 03_Track_Z
Zexy, good call, i should have said

" while still N/A, you will definately lose some power with 3" vs. 2.5" "

You'll see gains either way though
Not true
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 06:12 PM
  #11  
BLN350Z's Avatar
BLN350Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge. Louisiana
Default

Zexy,

Why don't you elaborate instead of saying "Not True" over and over. I am anxious to hear your logic behind your "not trues'"!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 06:52 AM
  #12  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

You loose anything up top, but you may loose some trq and power in the midrange.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #13  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 03_Track_Z
Zexy, good call, i should have said

" while still N/A, you will definately lose some power with 3" vs. 2.5" "

You'll see gains either way though
Well, if he is refering to a single 3 inch.. Power would not be lost whatsoever. To put it this in a simple way...Many aftermarket systems come with 3 single piping.

Now if we are talking about a dual for NA i'd say 2.5 would be beneficial for each outlet.

Backpressure is very overestimated/rated IMO. A more restrctive exhaust will cause added low end power and something free flow would cause more top end but too big piping would not cause power loss.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #14  
Nismo350ZRT's Avatar
Nismo350ZRT
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: Roy, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Zexy
Well, if he is refering to a single 3 inch.. Power would not be lost whatsoever. To put it this in a simple way...Many aftermarket systems come with 3 single piping.

Now if we are talking about a dual for NA i'd say 2.5 would be beneficial for each outlet.

Backpressure is very overestimated/rated IMO. A more restrctive exhaust will cause added low end power and something free flow would cause more top end but too big piping would not cause power loss.
Zexy, so do you think for FI, a dual 2.5" or single 3" exhaust would be a better setup for the street, more low end torque, than a dual 3" exhaust? Would a single 3" exhaust like the Amuse flow enough for 400-450whp?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 03:55 PM
  #15  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

In FI applictions i'd say a Dual 2.5" or single 3" would be just fine and yes it should be enough flow for 400-450whp.

I'd say dual 3" are for extreme applications(600whp+). That's with a twin turbo setup.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 06:13 PM
  #16  
godmans's Avatar
godmans
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

you dun need ANY backpressure to gain torque..
So, you might ask why the hack am i losing low end torque
when i go on some larger sized exhaust like 3" ?

the reason is because your piping is too large for low
range rpm that the exhaust speed is essentially LOWER
in a larger piping.. (by simple fluid mechanics principles)
thus, the Scavenging effect for low rpm range is diminished

but yet, since you are essentially DECREASING the backpressure
with larger piping..which in turn gives you better high end horse power

P.S. rule of thumb is: backpressure requires the exhaust flow to do
WORK in pushing the flow out..so you DUN need backpressure..
but an optimal exhaust size to accomodate either high end / mid range /
low end needs

hope this helps
regards,

Godmans
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2005 | 06:24 PM
  #17  
Zexy's Avatar
Zexy
Registered User
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO, FL
Default

^ Thanks for the more accurate information.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 09:38 AM
  #18  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Zexy
In FI applictions i'd say a Dual 2.5" or single 3" would be just fine and yes it should be enough flow for 400-450whp.

I'd say dual 3" are for extreme applications(600whp+). That's with a twin turbo setup.
Actually, a 3 inch exhuast will benifit even the lower boost cars. We usually see about 15-20 whp more when running 3 inch true dual vs. 2.5 inch, at just 8psi of pressure.


The only way to answer this question, is tune/dyno the car with the 2.5 inch exhuast, and then disconnect it entirely, and see if peak whp improved. We have done this on several cars, and noted good gains on the 3 inch pipes.

Now, for instance, with a TN single kit, all you need is a single 3 inch pipe all the way back, for zero backpressure at moderate boost levels. We tested this one as well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MAsSIVrOOM
Engine & Drivetrain
2
Oct 20, 2023 10:50 AM
apex locator
Autocross/Road
10
Jul 23, 2021 02:27 AM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
ablaine
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
51
Nov 29, 2016 10:13 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:19 AM.