Just dyno'd w/ Mrev2+5/16" copper iso
So, even though I used a torque wrench, one of the 6 bolts holding down the mrev2 snapped. Took it down to Zcar garage in San Jose yesterday to have them fix the snapped bolt (which was a great experience btw, can't say enough good things about this place and Rob/Employee's). I figured I'd get it dyno'd and have them install some sways while I was there. I know it might be somewhat useless since I never got a baseline Dyno before the popcharger/mrev2/spacer. But here are the results anyways.
Max power=244.01
Max Torque=235.17
Max power=244.01
Max Torque=235.17
Btw, though the peak numbers are a little lower than I expected, the car definitely feels like it has a good increase in torque down low and in the mid/upper mid rpms. Though it does feel like I lost a small amount of power up top.
Last edited by Blaumph; Dec 2, 2007 at 02:33 AM.
Nice numbers! My revup lay down 252rwhp/239rwtq on a different day-different dyno with virtually identical mods but your numbers aren't far off. Although your peak may not be that impressive... that minimum of 220tq from a bit over 2000-5700rpm is nice to have.
yea, the 5/16 lowers peak hp a bit in favor of more underneath the curve. I prefer the 1/2 spacer for a better peak.
with my previous motor on a dyno jet i dyno'd 251 std havent gotten a chance to dyno the V2 revup ..since i have no oil consumption finally. .jesus.
with my previous motor on a dyno jet i dyno'd 251 std havent gotten a chance to dyno the V2 revup ..since i have no oil consumption finally. .jesus.
Originally Posted by davidv
I like the chart except after 6,000 RPM. Is the motor running lean?
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by RBlover69
yea, the 5/16 lowers peak hp a bit in favor of more underneath the curve. I prefer the 1/2 spacer for a better peak.
not the 5/16,......it suppose to provide gains mid range with a minor loss uptop , the 1/2 spacer mated with the mrev2 on the revup was suppose to provide benefits uptop while provding lesser gains mid range but both are supposed to be better then the stock setup on a revup unit.
Originally Posted by Blaumph
So, even though I used a torque wrench, one of the 6 bolts holding down the mrev2 snapped. Took it down to Zcar garage in San Jose yesterday to have them fix the snapped bolt (which was a great experience btw, can't say enough good things about this place and Rob/Employee's). I figured I'd get it dyno'd and have them install some sways while I was there. I know it might be somewhat useless since I never got a baseline Dyno before the popcharger/mrev2/spacer. But here are the results anyways.
This is true, but it's ok -- the MD spacer and MREV2 have been independantly dyno'd on MANY cars and has proven performance.
That said, I would not pay for a dyno without air/fuel measurement....
These numbers are worthless without a previous dyno or baseline dyno. They're just numbers...not comparable to anything other than someone else dyno'ing in the same exact dyno at the same time.
.
.
Originally Posted by RBlover69
not the 5/16,......it suppose to provide gains mid range with a minor loss uptop , the 1/2 spacer mated with the mrev2 on the revup was suppose to provide benefits uptop while provding lesser gains mid range but both are supposed to be better then the stock setup on a revup unit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






