Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

NWP 75mm throttle body

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2013 | 10:40 AM
  #221  
redline06's Avatar
redline06
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
Unless you modify the inlet/intake at minimum to match the diameter, you're not doing anything but wasting your money. You don't need dyno to prove that. That's just common sense.

Think about it this way: If you increase the diameter of a midsection of a straw, you're not going to magically be able to suck in more through the straw.
Exactly!
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2013 | 02:19 PM
  #222  
03Screamer's Avatar
03Screamer
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
Unless you modify the inlet/intake at minimum to match the diameter, you're not doing anything but wasting your money. You don't need dyno to prove that. That's just common sense.

Think about it this way: If you increase the diameter of a midsection of a straw, you're not going to magically be able to suck in more through the straw.
5th grade logic FTW
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2013 | 04:56 PM
  #223  
2004Black350z's Avatar
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
Premier Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,097
Likes: 17
From: NC
Default

Well still going to test I guess. Doing my valve covers now. New plenum back on then off to retune. Then tb comparison then 4" Intake test.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2013 | 05:08 PM
  #224  
Epstein's Avatar
Epstein
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
Unless you modify the inlet/intake at minimum to match the diameter, you're not doing anything but wasting your money. You don't need dyno to prove that. That's just common sense.

Think about it this way: If you increase the diameter of a midsection of a straw, you're not going to magically be able to suck in more through the straw.
Actually, you will be able to suck more through the straw as long as you're not operating at choke flow, which in the case of intake components, we're not anywhere near. It's the same reasoning why you'll see a difference between 2 straws of the same diameter, one is 2 inches long, the other is 200 inches. Your analogy also implies that no one will ever make any additional power if they have a stock MAF housing and stock rear exhaust section, and they only change the headers, cats, cams, etc. There is a pretty ridiculous imbalance of old wive's tales to engineering theory on these boards.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2013 | 05:36 PM
  #225  
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Likes: 78
From: Dallas / Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Epstein
Actually, you will be able to suck more through the straw as long as you're not operating at choke flow, which in the case of intake components, we're not anywhere near. It's the same reasoning why you'll see a difference between 2 straws of the same diameter, one is 2 inches long, the other is 200 inches. Your analogy also implies that no one will ever make any additional power if they have a stock MAF housing and stock rear exhaust section, and they only change the headers, cats, cams, etc. There is a pretty ridiculous imbalance of old wive's tales to engineering theory on these boards.
Your example of 2 straws of same diameter but different length doesn't apply here. Nobody's changing length.

As for stock MAF housing and stock rear section with aftermarket whatever in between is a complicated comparison. In that example, you're not only changing the diameter but flow characteristics with different header lengths, less restrictions through use of HFCs or test pipes, changing duration with different cams, etc.

I may have oversimplified things (Bernoulli's principle) but my comparison makes more sense than yours. I could be wrong so feel free to correct me.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2013 | 07:11 PM
  #226  
03Screamer's Avatar
03Screamer
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by Epstein
Actually, you will be able to suck more through the straw as long as you're not operating at choke flow, which in the case of intake components, we're not anywhere near. It's the same reasoning why you'll see a difference between 2 straws of the same diameter, one is 2 inches long, the other is 200 inches. Your analogy also implies that no one will ever make any additional power if they have a stock MAF housing and stock rear exhaust section, and they only change the headers, cats, cams, etc. There is a pretty ridiculous imbalance of old wive's tales to engineering theory on these boards.
From a physics standpoint that is true, but the actual real world gains by reducing this ~ 1" length of restriction (when the inner plenum elbow is 4" in length at least) is going to be minimal.

And your analogy works in an entirely different manner for the most part. Of course removing cats will make power, but what about removing just one-foruth length of cat? It would seem like a waste of time to me. Cams regulate the amount/timing of air pumping through the motor...which is again a bit different. Headers have a large effect on scavenging, which again is quite differnet to discussing flow capacity of a pipe.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2013 | 09:00 PM
  #227  
waldo36's Avatar
waldo36
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 309
Likes: 2
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Default

Just a few more posts and I think I could ace an engineering exam.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2013 | 10:42 PM
  #228  
Patty's Avatar
Patty
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Default

Hagen-Poiseuille law : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagen–Poiseuille_equation

as you can see, the radius of the pipe affects the volumetric flow rate exponentiated by 4. Taking this into account with our throttle body and leaving every other dimension const. - you come to the following conclusion :

(75mm/70mm)^4 = 1,318 what equates an increase of 31,8% in volumetric flow.

just a little bit of straight forward engineering
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2013 | 05:18 AM
  #229  
1cockyZ's Avatar
1cockyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 2
From: Toms River, NJ
Default

That law does not apply for these reasons: air is compressible, the throttle body has a larger diameter than length as well as not being uniform, there is a throttle blade in the way affecting laminar flow. More like straight forward misapplication. Find me flow bench data that supports this law for the application of an automotive throttle body.


closer to reality.http://www.lxforums.com/board/f88/th...ulator-194536/
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2013 | 07:19 AM
  #230  
Patty's Avatar
Patty
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Default

funny to follow the reaction.
Of course the equation I brought in has limits for applying it. However it will give you an useful idea 1st about the changes without beeing that far away like comparisons of surging through a straw. The calculation you refer to is much more homework going in addition with a lot more accounts you can just as little prove that it fits the situation better than hagen-poiseuille law.

..trying to keep things as simple as possible but accurate as necessary.

Last edited by Patty; Sep 10, 2013 at 07:21 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 11:27 AM
  #231  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

you guys are arguing theory when there has been a dyno posted showing no gains. WTF
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 01:25 PM
  #232  
johnnyzcar's Avatar
johnnyzcar
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

So where are the NWP people in all of this. I would think they would not want to mislead people and become known for selling snake oil.In other words someone should send them a link to this thread to get their reaction.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 01:36 PM
  #233  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

^^^
that join date and post

Well what I found being out of touch as I am...if it's not on instagram or facebook...folks don't know how to google or use a forum...

If I were them I'd be looking into making a larger than aftermarket pipe
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2015 | 01:53 PM
  #234  
nitish21's Avatar
nitish21
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

This is odd.. The gains are not reported at the peak point but after 5200rpm when oem tb drops heavily
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2018 | 12:40 PM
  #235  
onevq35de's Avatar
onevq35de
New Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 607
Likes: 96
From: Sweaty South NC
Default

Originally Posted by 2bad240
I know my car isn't stock and I have alot of mods

But I decided to swap tbs on the dyno today. Same dyno same tune same day.
But I don't have the Nwp kit. I have the maxima 75mm tb with a port matched 1.5" spacer

It wasn't by much but I made more with the stock tb
Less than 1 hp all motor. And I tried them both with nitrous and the stock one made 4hp more
Attachment 435503
Old thread, no ****, but I've gotta add something here for the next guy who wants to stay n/a on a vq, just to set the record straight. I think I know where this went wrong.
There is no way, imo, to install the 75mm t.b. directly onto the v-plenum correctly. I was hoping to do so based upon this thread, but it's impossible, assuming one desires to keep the opening on the t.b. lined up with the opening on the v-plenum. It's not about the existing holes not lining up with the those of the 75mm but instead, the new holes will have nothing to bite into UNLESS you shift the t.b. and in doing so, it will not line up with the neck's entrance. Shame too because I was hoping to bypass the adapter plate, not to save $ but less ********. Even if one could get this to work, the v-plenum and most likely oem and other aftermarket plenums have a smaller opening than the t.b. which, with a larger t.b. would exacerbate the mis-matched issue causing increased turbulence.
After finding out the 75mm is a no-go fit, I ordered a nwp adapter plate and looked over the stock t.b.. The stocker is considerably larger than the opening on the v-plenum which is something I never considered to look at when I initially installed it. Sonofabitch. I've dremeled the opening to match the stock t.b. gasket until I get the adapter plate, at which point I'll match it to the lager t.b.. I also opened up the neck and will do more when the plate comes in. Will probably un-taper the tapered end of the plate which is tapered to match the oem neck opening.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2018 | 01:30 PM
  #236  
drozzy's Avatar
drozzy
New Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 85
Likes: 10
From: Ottawa
Default

According to this Motordyne G35 guy, this mod makes the top 7 for a VQ - no manifold mod mentioned otherwise. He does mention the fact that he's getting a custom intake down the road but still puts it on the list at #5.



Is this a wrapped Injen CAI hooked up to the 75 mm TB? (7:04)

I think I see a 5/16" spacer as well. Can anybody tell if he had fitment issues?

Not getting it if it indeed made only a few horses on a fully built motor.....
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2018 | 02:14 PM
  #237  
onevq35de's Avatar
onevq35de
New Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 607
Likes: 96
From: Sweaty South NC
Default

https://www.infinitiscene.com/thread....230572/page-6
My main thread. Just look for the appropriate photos.

Last edited by onevq35de; Mar 10, 2018 at 09:27 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Justin100
Exterior & Interior
11
Nov 25, 2021 06:26 AM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 AM.