Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

NWP 75mm throttle body

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2013 | 06:48 AM
  #181  
mw9's Avatar
mw9
Registered User
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 5
From: cincinnati
Default

Originally Posted by 1cockyZ
I think the upper plenum sucks. So you can put whatever size throttle body you want on it and you will get small changes. It's awesome we have this upgrade available and its so easy to do but it doesn't fix what's right behind it. It seems the FWD vq manifolds are better than the upper plenum nissan put on their sports car. I've read about the maxima guys getting gains with a 4" intake but not Z cars. I would love to swap a Kinetix velocity manifold on this car with the throttle body in place but its out of my hands. Although the new owner of the engine is definitely very engaged about the car.
Is there any proven aftermarket plenums out there?
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2013 | 02:41 PM
  #182  
2004Black350z's Avatar
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
Premier Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,097
Likes: 17
From: NC
Default

Mw9 shin beats has an Interesting thread on kinetix v+ I think. I bet with that tb and cams you would see huge gains to over 7k plus
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2013 | 03:00 PM
  #183  
Shin Beats's Avatar
Shin Beats
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,168
Likes: 4
From: MD
Default

Its the Velocity manifold not the V+. Big difference between the two!!
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2013 | 02:38 PM
  #184  
the3kgt2's Avatar
the3kgt2
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Placed an order. Will see how it does with a Vortech, built motor, and a tune.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2013 | 07:39 PM
  #185  
waldo36's Avatar
waldo36
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 309
Likes: 2
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Default

Originally Posted by the3kgt2
Placed an order. Will see how it does with a Vortech, built motor, and a tune.
My guess is you'll lose both HP and TQ. Engine won't be able to handle the extra air flow.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2013 | 07:51 PM
  #186  
Pholicious's Avatar
Pholicious
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Moncton, Newbrunswick
Default

Big Update:
















































I traded my car and cash for a built 2JZ swapped IS300 550whp@19psi pump gas
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2013 | 08:26 PM
  #187  
KingBaby's Avatar
KingBaby
Hardest Setting
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,406
Likes: 130
From: MexiCali dodging potholes
Default

Sad news...
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 01:21 AM
  #188  
2004Black350z's Avatar
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
Premier Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,097
Likes: 17
From: NC
Default

Awesome. Thx for helping out the Z community before you left. ........
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 10:17 AM
  #189  
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Likes: 78
From: Dallas / Chicago
Default

I don't ever foresee anyone doing an independent dyno with just this TB as the only change. People are going to tack on other mods and/or tune then claim gains.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 10:27 AM
  #190  
the3kgt2's Avatar
the3kgt2
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
or tune then claim gains.
I don't care about gains before a tune. For all we know the larger throttle body is just leaning out a previously rich tune, making it look like the part is superior instead of it just altering your A/F ratio.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 10:32 AM
  #191  
2004Black350z's Avatar
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
Premier Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,097
Likes: 17
From: NC
Default

Three5 im going to have a independent dyno however wont b 4 like 2 months
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 11:17 AM
  #192  
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Likes: 78
From: Dallas / Chicago
Default

^ Sweet. Looking forward to it.

Originally Posted by the3kgt2
I don't care about gains before a tune. For all we know the larger throttle body is just leaning out a previously rich tune, making it look like the part is superior instead of it just altering your A/F ratio.
Exactly. Who's to say that your previous tune was spot on or that your new tune won't be done better?

I'd rather have 1 variable than 2.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 11:44 AM
  #193  
1cockyZ's Avatar
1cockyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 2
From: Toms River, NJ
Default

If everyone is waiting for a back to back definitive dyno, its not worth waiting for. The dyno I posted has AFR for both throttle bodies and the timing was untouched. Different days, hot/cold, this is not the silver bullet.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 11:47 AM
  #194  
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Likes: 78
From: Dallas / Chicago
Default

I wouldn't say I'm waiting for a back to back dyno. I was just saying I'd like to see one pop up sometime. I'm not interested in getting this so the existence of said dyno doesn't really affect me.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 07:45 AM
  #195  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

Exactly, butt dynos lie as is obvious with all the so called "reviews"

Originally Posted by 1cockyZ
If everyone is waiting for a back to back definitive dyno, its not worth waiting for. The dyno I posted has AFR for both throttle bodies and the timing was untouched. Different days, hot/cold, this is not the silver bullet.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 12:29 AM
  #196  
Patty's Avatar
Patty
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Default

I'm wondering about the fact, that AFR is changing extremly lean and the gain after the tune is that less. In theorie changing a pipe diameter from 70mm to 75mm gains 30% more flow. When now the engine run lean that goes with the theorie, but the gains after tuning will not.

Interesting, what else is going wrong there.

However, even the 75mm throttle with a 3" single piping in front of is too small for that kind of engine. When you compare the cross sectional areas from the lower plenum runners to the area, what is left through the single pipe section (throttle body & intake system) even a 4" piping equals not the surfaces from the runners. Shows how restrictive the intake of the Z really is and that every opening of this pipe section should show hp gains especially with cams and higher rpm limits.

Patty

Last edited by Patty; Sep 6, 2013 at 03:32 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 05:52 AM
  #197  
1cockyZ's Avatar
1cockyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 2
From: Toms River, NJ
Default

The intake pipe is flowing continuously, the intake runners are flowing air one at a time.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 07:03 AM
  #198  
Patty's Avatar
Patty
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Default

you're right, but under high rpm take care of the pulse frequence @ each runner surging for air. Should be near to a continuous flow.

Last edited by Patty; Sep 6, 2013 at 07:04 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 10:50 AM
  #199  
Epstein's Avatar
Epstein
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Be careful not to directly correlate flow and cross-sectional area. One pipe with 10sq-in will have more mass flow per pressure drop than ten 1sq-in pipes, assuming equal lengths.

The severe leaning out of the AFR after the change is from people tuning fuel incorrectly. Basically, people are actually flowing more air, which is putting them on a new section of the MAF table. Everyone should be tuning on the fuel compensation table and not the MAF table. Tuning on the MAF table is basically turning the ECU into a giant S-AFC. Welcome back to the 90's, guys. A properly calibrated mass-flow system should have already added the appropriate amount of additional fuel to match the additional air.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 12:19 PM
  #200  
DirtyMech.'s Avatar
DirtyMech.
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa,JP
Default

Ding Ding Ding we have a winner!!!!


Soo as results of my tuning was from a starting point of the day 249whp with one pull. Was unsafe to do another. After a lot of fuel added it came to 262whp with the first dyno session of the day. After letting it cool and trying again. We got it up to 264whp. Let it cool again for a longer period. And tried again. Final PEAK number 267.8whp.

The tuner and shop kinda laughed at the 15whp alone. And I had to agree but a bigger carb is a bigger carb. If you know what I mean. Best $300 I ever spent... I'm talking about the tune not the Throttle Body.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 AM.