Some Subie Snow Driftin
02-02-2010, 01:17 PM
#33
New Member
iTrader: (68)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: McDonalds - NOVA - DC/MD/VA
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Settle down class, we begin our lesson with:
Flip to chapter five, please read the section titled, "When All Else Fails"
Though most people tend to want to feel as if they're correct in a logical sense. This pattern is most prevalent in males. The action is direct associated with what we call the "ego." For example, we see here that abui01 responded to Alberto's statement, however in retaliation, he responds with:
This quote has no direct correlation to either the topic of this thread, nor was it a response to an earlier statement. We now question, what was the purpose of this response? As most of you know, everything in life must contain purpose. There cannot be a human action which is totally random. There is always a history, a reason, a philosophy behind the said action. In this case, the "action" is a statement which has no correlation to anything but this person named "abui01" himself.
The reason why this section is called "When All Else Fails," is because the ego is demonstrated quite clearly. Failing to respond to the latest statement, Alberto here is seen making what we call a direct attack of character. To perhaps, discredit and/or what rappers call, "make a fool," of the recipient. Though, his attack is littered with opinions, for example the use of the word, "lame." Why would one use such words as "lame?" It clearly has no relevance in the grand scheme of things. If this was a court room and the judge was presented with nothing but "you are lame" then the chances of him telling Alberto to "GTFO of my courtroom" would be.... very likely. Whereas abui01 responded with facts seen below:
The statement was a question, hence the "?" mark. Which of course, received no response. I wasn't surprised by the slightest. One cannot deny the validity of this statement based on its facts. Twisty does not equal straight. Though, I would like to believe Alberto having a high amount of intelligence, however his responses do not prove my theory correct by any means. Though, I do still hope this may be true one day for the sake of humanity. I have a dream that one day I may converse with another individual without him/her having to resort to name calling and/or opinionated responses such as "lame." I can safely assume we've all passed 5th grade by now.
Please turn to chapter 9, titled, "When you can't think of any other insults, re-use, reduce, and recycle!"
Alberto is Pro-Green when it comes to the economy, the environment, and his attempt to insult another. For example, when we have a brain-fart and can't think of anything else clever to say, just recycle the same insult we've been using since 2004!
The best part? That's not even all the times he recycled the EXACT SAME INSULT!
Let's see here... we got panties in a "bunch" and a "wad." Let me broaden your vocabulary: You might want to say panties in a loop? a knot! Or how about in a weggy? Or don't get your panties with cat? In a hat? In a house? with a mouse?
Though for argument's sake, if I were to have panties I'd get them in a size M, not XXS, but I'm glad you're paying attention to my under-garments though I don't really sway that way. Folks in DuPont circle can help you out with this fascination though.
LOGIC 101
Flip to chapter five, please read the section titled, "When All Else Fails"
Though most people tend to want to feel as if they're correct in a logical sense. This pattern is most prevalent in males. The action is direct associated with what we call the "ego." For example, we see here that abui01 responded to Alberto's statement, however in retaliation, he responds with:
The reason why this section is called "When All Else Fails," is because the ego is demonstrated quite clearly. Failing to respond to the latest statement, Alberto here is seen making what we call a direct attack of character. To perhaps, discredit and/or what rappers call, "make a fool," of the recipient. Though, his attack is littered with opinions, for example the use of the word, "lame." Why would one use such words as "lame?" It clearly has no relevance in the grand scheme of things. If this was a court room and the judge was presented with nothing but "you are lame" then the chances of him telling Alberto to "GTFO of my courtroom" would be.... very likely. Whereas abui01 responded with facts seen below:
Originally Posted by abui01
I agree, it is funny considering a "twisty" road isn't exactly straight. Maybe that's why it's called a twisty road and not a straight road?
Alberto is Pro-Green when it comes to the economy, the environment, and his attempt to insult another. For example, when we have a brain-fart and can't think of anything else clever to say, just recycle the same insult we've been using since 2004!
At all the guys who got their panties in a bunch over a smart a$$ comment.
You a sarcasm monitor? So because some people get their panties in a bunch I have to change how I post sometimes?
Let's see here... we got panties in a "bunch" and a "wad." Let me broaden your vocabulary: You might want to say panties in a loop? a knot! Or how about in a weggy? Or don't get your panties with cat? In a hat? In a house? with a mouse?
Though for argument's sake, if I were to have panties I'd get them in a size M, not XXS, but I'm glad you're paying attention to my under-garments though I don't really sway that way. Folks in DuPont circle can help you out with this fascination though.
02-02-2010, 03:39 PM
#35
I read two sentences of your reply and you lost my interest. Im not reading 1 page of jibber jabber.
If my car, my driving and my videos are lame, dont ask me for a ride at the next meet like you have the last 2x you have seen me.
edit-so I read enough of that long post to get the point of it. If I had $1 Mr. Original posted something in regards to an oil cooler, Tokyo Drift or rice Id have more money than he would if he had $3 everytime I used that panties line, you can search all my posts and probobly find Ive repeated myself more times than anything, great post by him, surely he did "win"
If my car, my driving and my videos are lame, dont ask me for a ride at the next meet like you have the last 2x you have seen me.
edit-so I read enough of that long post to get the point of it. If I had $1 Mr. Original posted something in regards to an oil cooler, Tokyo Drift or rice Id have more money than he would if he had $3 everytime I used that panties line, you can search all my posts and probobly find Ive repeated myself more times than anything, great post by him, surely he did "win"
Last edited by Alberto; 02-03-2010 at 04:04 AM.
02-03-2010, 10:30 AM
#36
New Member
iTrader: (68)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: McDonalds - NOVA - DC/MD/VA
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
^ You weren't taking this internet stuff seriously were you? We've known each other for 4 years, if I would've known you took it personally, next time we meet up I'll buy you a drink and give you a big-fat-hug. No hard feelings here bro. 
02-03-2010, 03:06 PM
#39
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bowie Maryland
Posts: 2,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read two sentences of your reply and you lost my interest. Im not reading 1 page of jibber jabber.
If my car, my driving and my videos are lame, dont ask me for a ride at the next meet like you have the last 2x you have seen me.
edit-so I read enough of that long post to get the point of it. If I had $1 Mr. Original posted something in regards to an oil cooler, Tokyo Drift or rice Id have more money than he would if he had $3 everytime I used that panties line, you can search all my posts and probobly find Ive repeated myself more times than anything, great post by him, surely he did "win"
If my car, my driving and my videos are lame, dont ask me for a ride at the next meet like you have the last 2x you have seen me.
edit-so I read enough of that long post to get the point of it. If I had $1 Mr. Original posted something in regards to an oil cooler, Tokyo Drift or rice Id have more money than he would if he had $3 everytime I used that panties line, you can search all my posts and probobly find Ive repeated myself more times than anything, great post by him, surely he did "win"
