Beat an S2000!
Originally posted by 0002S
Mr Fairlady, has a point.
Start with and stay with one dyno on this discussion as dyno numbers varies form dyno to dyno and condition to condition.
One respected tuner and owner an S2000 has dyno'd (dyno pac) 20 plus models from 2000-2002. 2000-2001 models appear to run 5 hp less than 2002. (this is not enough to change a 350Z - S2000 race result) The reason behind this hp increase appears to be (in theory) a factory reprogrammed ECU, which advances timing in 2002 models. This also appears to produce more (little amount) usable low-end torque. Even with cars that have more than 10,000 miles on them the increases seem to be the same. I have heard nothing about 2003 models vs. 2000-2002.
This is a well-argued and documented theory on S2Ki.com. As an owner of 2002 and driver of 2000 and 2001 models, I do not notice the difference with the butt dyno.
JM2C
Mr Fairlady, has a point.
Start with and stay with one dyno on this discussion as dyno numbers varies form dyno to dyno and condition to condition.
One respected tuner and owner an S2000 has dyno'd (dyno pac) 20 plus models from 2000-2002. 2000-2001 models appear to run 5 hp less than 2002. (this is not enough to change a 350Z - S2000 race result) The reason behind this hp increase appears to be (in theory) a factory reprogrammed ECU, which advances timing in 2002 models. This also appears to produce more (little amount) usable low-end torque. Even with cars that have more than 10,000 miles on them the increases seem to be the same. I have heard nothing about 2003 models vs. 2000-2002.
This is a well-argued and documented theory on S2Ki.com. As an owner of 2002 and driver of 2000 and 2001 models, I do not notice the difference with the butt dyno.
JM2C
That makes sense, but Mr. Fairlady said that only the 2000 model was slower
Come on...5hp and a tiny bit of torque isn't going to do much of anything. Especially change the outcome of a race.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Hendersonville, NC
Originally posted by 2001Stang
come on JP00SS fill us in.
Oh and if anyone here thinks they can beat a properly driven 98 + SS in a straight line with a stock 350Z is ummmm smoking some wackey stuff
Not that the 350Z is slow it is just that the SS is very fast off the show room floor.
come on JP00SS fill us in.
Oh and if anyone here thinks they can beat a properly driven 98 + SS in a straight line with a stock 350Z is ummmm smoking some wackey stuff
Not that the 350Z is slow it is just that the SS is very fast off the show room floor.
. I am thinking if he had a 150 shot (which I am pretty sure he didn't he was a V6 Camaro) because even if he was a LS1 he should have beat CLS or hung with me better unless he can't drive, but then again, anything can happen on the streets.
Sorry guys, I have been away. JP00SS is right. The guy said he had a 150 shot and he had everything to make it look like a real SS. Maybe it was a stock AUTO SS with heavy *** chrome wheels. Whatever it was he got his *** handed to him twice. Here is my dyno: Why is it so spikey up top?
Well,.the whole S2000 thing--ya know,..I undestand about the hp not being much to have made him lost--I'm glad you won---thats cool,.thats just what I heard--so thought it was more then 5hp?
But the INTEGRA TYPE-R thing!! That is 100% true!!!
the 97s we're the slowest-98's we;re a little faster(pretty much the same--but in 2000-2001 there are different cam's in it(differnet cam profile)More aggresive!! No ****!!
they are all diffrent---> the ITR's are all hand made--now your maxima is not along w/ the otehr Maxima's in the world,..so thats why that dosen't apply==but INtegras you could truley get a Friday car or a Monday car--but the 2000 & 01's are the fastest!!! ASK Anyone!(PYellow's are said to be the fastest--but not for sure)--go to H-T and post that up and see what they say!hahaha
I'm a Honda-techer and Lots of friends own them(ITR's)
I was very close to being a 98 CW owner & 2000 PY ITR #510 owner
but eitehr way
NICE KILL!
But the INTEGRA TYPE-R thing!! That is 100% true!!!
the 97s we're the slowest-98's we;re a little faster(pretty much the same--but in 2000-2001 there are different cam's in it(differnet cam profile)More aggresive!! No ****!!
they are all diffrent---> the ITR's are all hand made--now your maxima is not along w/ the otehr Maxima's in the world,..so thats why that dosen't apply==but INtegras you could truley get a Friday car or a Monday car--but the 2000 & 01's are the fastest!!! ASK Anyone!(PYellow's are said to be the fastest--but not for sure)--go to H-T and post that up and see what they say!hahaha
I'm a Honda-techer and Lots of friends own them(ITR's)
I was very close to being a 98 CW owner & 2000 PY ITR #510 owner
but eitehr way
NICE KILL!
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
...as Mr. Fairlady stated the 2002s are the fastest s2000 and the 2000s are the slowest. This is a fact (go over to s2ki.com, it's been proven with dynos). For those who say that it's not that much of a difference, a 2000 s2k with exhaust and intake will generally dyno around the same as a bone stock 2002 ... so it is a big difference. This is also the case between 2000+ Type R's vs previous year Type R's. These are FACTS.
...as Mr. Fairlady stated the 2002s are the fastest s2000 and the 2000s are the slowest. This is a fact (go over to s2ki.com, it's been proven with dynos). For those who say that it's not that much of a difference, a 2000 s2k with exhaust and intake will generally dyno around the same as a bone stock 2002 ... so it is a big difference. This is also the case between 2000+ Type R's vs previous year Type R's. These are FACTS.
Thank you BLACKS--I knew I wasn't that F*cked up!
but either way,..not saying that if it was a 2002 you would have lost--just peice of mind!!
I remember my Friend Joey B. sayin that his was slower then the others...but I'll be racing 2 2002'2 in the next few weeks!!
both guys driving only weigh about damn 110lbs wet!hahahah
one is 17 other is 20
so we'll see how it goes w/ the "Almost Dubs" on too!
Originally posted by blackS
...as Mr. Fairlady stated the 2002s are the fastest s2000 and the 2000s are the slowest. This is a fact (go over to s2ki.com, it's been proven with dynos). For those who say that it's not that much of a difference, a 2000 s2k with exhaust and intake will generally dyno around the same as a bone stock 2002 ... so it is a big difference. This is also the case between 2000+ Type R's vs previous year Type R's. These are FACTS.
...as Mr. Fairlady stated the 2002s are the fastest s2000 and the 2000s are the slowest. This is a fact (go over to s2ki.com, it's been proven with dynos). For those who say that it's not that much of a difference, a 2000 s2k with exhaust and intake will generally dyno around the same as a bone stock 2002 ... so it is a big difference. This is also the case between 2000+ Type R's vs previous year Type R's. These are FACTS.
FACTS....right dude..that's why the 2000 model year S2K in this thread dynoed at 204whp...and that's one of the highest stock S2k dynos that I've seen.
take a look at this link to a dyno day where 8 S2000s dynoed....and the modded ones typically dynoed LESS than the stock ones. Plus I believe the highest stock S2000 was a 2000 model year.
http://www.elistan.com/2003-02-01_dyno_day
Nice FACTS buddy
na dude,..your taking this the wrong way!!! CHill bro...Thats just what I've heard about 2000 yr models!!
I don't care if its true or not!!!
Its all good,...some dyno differnet but either way...I've heard more then a few people say that about em'...but either way--I'll race one don't give a damn!hahahah
Look @ the Z's,..they have all been dyno'ing different as well!!!
I don't care if its true or not!!!
Its all good,...some dyno differnet but either way...I've heard more then a few people say that about em'...but either way--I'll race one don't give a damn!hahahah
Look @ the Z's,..they have all been dyno'ing different as well!!!
Originally posted by Mr Fairlady
na dude,..your taking this the wrong way!!! CHill bro...Thats just what I've heard about 2000 yr models!!
I don't care if its true or not!!!
Its all good,...some dyno differnet but either way...I've heard more then a few people say that about em'...but either way--I'll race one don't give a damn!hahahah
Look @ the Z's,..they have all been dyno'ing different as well!!!
na dude,..your taking this the wrong way!!! CHill bro...Thats just what I've heard about 2000 yr models!!
I don't care if its true or not!!!
Its all good,...some dyno differnet but either way...I've heard more then a few people say that about em'...but either way--I'll race one don't give a damn!hahahah
Look @ the Z's,..they have all been dyno'ing different as well!!!
As for people that sit there and look at dynos all day to see what model year averages higher by a couple horses....they need to get a friggen life...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
