Notices
Southern California San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange County, Inland Empire, etc.

California Bill to Require ANNUAL Emissions Tests

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2007, 04:00 PM
  #1  
350Zteve
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
350Zteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Stop this Douche Bag !!!!!

Subject: SEMA Legislative Alert: California Introduces Bill to Require ANNUAL Emissions Tests for Vehicles 15-Years Old and Older

Details:
Jason Tolleson, jasont@sema.org <
mailto:jasont@sema.org> SEMA 202/783-6007, ext. 39

URGENT LEGISLATIVE ALERT
California Introduces Bill to Require ANNUAL Emissions Tests
for Vehicles 15-Years Old and Older
Here we go again! Legislation (A.B. 616) has been introduced in the
California Assembly by Assemblyman Dave Jones
<
mailto:%20Assemblymember.jones@assembly.ca.gov> to require annual Smog check inspections for vehicles 15-years old and older. The bill would
also require that funds generated through the additional inspection fees
be deposited into an account which can be used to scrap older cars. You
may recall that in 2004 a new law was enacted in California to require
the lifetime testing of all 1976 and newer model-year vehicles.
Pre-1976 motor vehicles would remain exempt under A.B. 616. The bill
has been referred to the Assembly Transportation Committee.
We Urge You to Contact Assemblyman Jones and members of the Assembly
Transportation Committee (List Below) Immediately to Oppose A.B. 616
* A.B. 616 ignores the minimal impact vintage cars have on air
quality.
* A.B. 616 could entice vintage car owners into allowing these
vehicles to be scrapped.
* A.B. 616 ignores the fact that vehicles 15-years old and older
still constitute a small portion of the overall vehicle population and
are a poor source from which to look for emissions reduction.
* A.B. 616 ignores the fact that classic vehicles are
overwhelmingly well-maintained and infrequently driven.
* A.B. 616 would increase costs by creating an annual inspection
fee for owners of these vehicles.
* A.B. 616 represents another attempt by California legislators
and regulators to scapegoat older cars.
Please contact members of the California Assembly Transportation
Committee immediately by phone, fax or e-mail to request their
opposition to A.B. 616.
Please e-mail a copy of your letter to stevem@sema.org. Thank you for
your assistance.

Assembly Transportation Committee
Pedro Nava, Chair
Telephone: (916) 319-2035
Fax: (916) 319-2135
Email: Assemblymember.nava@assembly.ca.gov
Michael D. Duvall, Vice-Chair
Telephone: (916) 319-2072
Fax: (916) 319-2172
Email: Assemblymember.Duvall@assembly.ca.gov
Wilma Amina Carter
Telephone: (916) 319-2062
Fax: (916) 319-2162
Email: Assemblymember.Carter@assembly.ca.gov
Mike DeSaulnier
Telephone: (916) 319-2011
Fax: (916) 319-2111
Email: Assemblymember.DeSaulnier@assembly.ca.gov
Cathleen Galgiani
Tel: (916) 319-2017
Fax: (916) 319-2117
Email: Assemblymember.Galgiani@assembly.ca.gov
Martin Garrick
Telephone: (916) 319-2074
Fax: (916) 319-2174
Email: Assemblymember.Garrick@assembly.ca.gov
Shirley Horton
Telephone: (916) 319-2078
Email: Assemblymember.Shirley.Horton@assembly.ca.gov
Guy S. Houston
Telephone: (916) 319-2015
Fax: (916) 319-2115
Email: Assemblymember.Houston@assembly.ca.gov
Bob Huff
Telephone: (916) 319-2060
Fax: (916) 319-2160
Email: assemblymember.huff@assembly.ca.gov
Betty Karnette
Telephone: (916) 319-2054
Email: Assemblymember.Karnette@assembly.ca.gov
Anthony J. Portantino
Telephone: (916) 319-2044
Fax: (916) 319-2144
Email: assemblymember.Portantino@assembly.ca.gov
Ira Ruskin
Telephone: (916) 319 - 2021
Fax: (916) 319 - 2121
Email: Assemblymember.Ruskin@assembly.ca.gov
Jose Solorio
Telephone: (916) 319-2069
Fax: (916) 319-2169
Nell Soto
Telephone: (916) 319-2061
Fax: (916) 319-2161
Email: Assemblymember.Soto@assembly.ca.gov
Old 03-05-2007, 04:19 PM
  #2  
THE TECH
Registered User
iTrader: (154)
 
THE TECH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hills of Anaheim
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Death to CARB!!
Old 03-05-2007, 10:54 PM
  #3  
ANXIOUZ
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
ANXIOUZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After looking into my legal FI options I'm about ready to move outta here. The only thing CA has going for it is the weather and nightlife.
Old 03-06-2007, 12:56 AM
  #4  
Cannysage
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Cannysage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SO_CAL
Posts: 7,374
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

although CARB can lick my sack, you still have to be objective about emission, somewhat. I still don't unstand why 15 year? the major emission restriction came about in 1968 or so and cars been pretty tamed ever since.. I hope they come out with tech that can produce ultra low emission, producing 5000whp...
Old 03-06-2007, 04:21 AM
  #5  
teh215
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
teh215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Posts: 5,753
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

One more reason not to live in California.
Old 04-18-2007, 08:07 AM
  #6  
Anomaly
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Anomaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Disneyland
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I believe the voting for this occured on Monday, April 16, 2007.

I think the bill passed through the California Assembly.

Type "AB 616" in the bill number section

UNOFFICIAL BALLOT
MEASURE: AB 616
AUTHOR: Jones
TOPIC: Smog check: annual inspection: repair assista
DATE: 04/16/2007
LOCATION: ASM. TRANS.
MOTION: Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
(AYES 8. NOES 4.) (PASS)


AYES
****

Nava Carter DeSaulnier Galgiani
Karnette Portantino Ruskin Berg


NOES
****

Duvall Garrick Houston Huff


ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING
*********************************

Horton Solorio

Last edited by Anomaly; 04-18-2007 at 08:20 AM.
Old 04-18-2007, 08:18 AM
  #7  
dubbzdiggler
Registered User
 
dubbzdiggler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pretty soon the streets of california are going to be covered in horse poop bc no one will be able to drive cars and you'll all start to ride horses and bugggies to work again. Good, great, thanks democrats.
Old 04-18-2007, 08:21 AM
  #8  
Jay'Z
Banned
iTrader: (118)
 
Jay'Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Carbon Fiber, TX
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Cali FTL!!
Old 04-18-2007, 08:21 AM
  #9  
ReV74
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
ReV74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lawndale
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dubbzdiggler
Pretty soon the streets of california are going to be covered in horse poop bc no one will be able to drive cars and you'll all start to ride horses and bugggies to work again. Good, great, thanks democrats.
I want a pony! lol
Old 04-18-2007, 08:31 AM
  #10  
Anomaly
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Anomaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Disneyland
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I propose a bill that (for the cause of smog/emissions reduction, fuel conservation, and state budget <spending reduction for fuel>) that requires police vehicles (primarily patrol) to be powered by 4-cylinder engines with capacities no larger than 2.0L.
Old 04-18-2007, 08:35 AM
  #11  
97supratt
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
 
97supratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Glendale California
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by THE TECH
Death to CARB!!

+1 trillion
Old 04-18-2007, 08:44 AM
  #12  
03BrickyardZ
Registered User
 
03BrickyardZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Anomaly
I propose a bill that (for the cause of smog/emissions reduction, fuel conservation, and state budget <spending reduction for fuel>) that requires police vehicles (primarily patrol) to be powered by 4-cylinder engines with capacities no larger than 2.0L.
That would still allow them to drive the RSX - S... It wouldn't be fair to people trying to run. I say take it down to 1.8 L.

California needs to regulate SUVs... And thier power generation industry... I know that even before the major revamps in emmissions testing in GA, the biggest polluter was sothern company/GA power... even more than all the cars combined. But southern company gets away with it because the fines are small compared to the upgrades they would need to reduce emissions. (Plus, they are less visible than that Excursion/expedition/suburban/escalade.)
Old 04-18-2007, 08:50 AM
  #13  
myladyz33
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
myladyz33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: florida
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

<3 florida
Old 04-18-2007, 08:51 AM
  #14  
Z MANIA
psychedelic one
 
Z MANIA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Another Democrat, under the guise of saving the environment and clean air attempting to get into the pockets of Californians that they haven't reached yet.

Sample meeting minutes: "Damn it people!! We are Democrats!! We've got to find a way to raise taxes, but how? Let's see...hmmmm we can get the sales tax again. No, people will scream bloody murder. Cigarettes? Gasoline? Alcohol? Who can we snake and make it look like we're doing something for the people of California? Muahaha!! *

*Actual meeting minutes may vary. Normal side affects of Democratic power are: sweating of the hands, loss of money in your wallet, tightening of the sphincter, and children born with the heads of horses. Please contact your fianancial agent for how this may have further impact on you.
Old 04-18-2007, 12:39 PM
  #15  
MR_X
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
MR_X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: El Centro, Ca.
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Glad I'm transferring out of this state by Oct.
Old 04-18-2007, 01:22 PM
  #16  
Rickdogg
Out of hiatus
iTrader: (234)
 
Rickdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: My350z
Posts: 10,759
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Edit: read the entire post. Wow that is a bit too extreme there. Talk about nutso

Last edited by Rickdogg; 04-18-2007 at 01:29 PM.
Old 04-18-2007, 02:33 PM
  #17  
Boneout JZA80
Sponsor
Shine Auto Project
iTrader: (89)
 
Boneout JZA80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: osaka ~ los angeles[213]
Posts: 11,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by THE TECH
Death to CARB!!

+1





is this an attempt to try to fix our traffic nonsense problem


cali traffic = one major trip in one day
Old 04-18-2007, 02:37 PM
  #18  
techcontrol
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
techcontrol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Biloxi, MS
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow! Do I feel sorry for you Cali guys.
Old 04-18-2007, 04:30 PM
  #19  
John
...
iTrader: (17)
 
John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You all realize that many other areas in the country have emissions standards pretty much equal to that of CA, right? My inspection in VA was identical to the one here in CA, except that I had to pass a safety inspection annually. Yes, I compared the emissions thresholds and they were identical between states. I wish that if they're going to target emissions, they do so on the older cars and trucks, as that's where the majority of the pollution is. Instead they continue to squeeze new cars because of their sheer number, even though they contribute a minute amount of pollution compared to the rest.
Old 04-18-2007, 05:29 PM
  #20  
UHATEIT
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
UHATEIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northridge/Canoga Park, SOCAL
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

correct me if I am way off, but my neighbor was mentioning that all cars 2005 and up are smog exempt? is that correct or is it 2006 and up? I'm pretty sure it's 2006 but I am HOPING its's 20005 since my 350z is an 05 model


Quick Reply: California Bill to Require ANNUAL Emissions Tests



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:36 AM.