How to get 300whp+ on a HR
08-30-2009, 03:49 PM
#21
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ajax, On
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly. To be precise I put down 261whp and 233wtq with only the exhaust on the car. I am now over 300whp and over 250wtq. The headers, cats, intake and tune netted me 40whp (again I'm seriously doubting that I gained anything with the intakes).
08-30-2009, 03:55 PM
#22
New Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
most of the aftermarket intakes are rated to reduce torque mid to high rpms stock air box is the way to.
and it doesnt void warrenty.. have you considered k&n derop in filers?
and it doesnt void warrenty.. have you considered k&n derop in filers?
08-30-2009, 04:42 PM
#24
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ajax, On
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same dyno though out my whole upgrade process. Advance Power House right here in Toronto.
Out of curiosity were you able to rise your rev limiter?
08-30-2009, 04:54 PM
#25
Temp correction doesn't account for anything else that could be going on with the engine given the more than likely large temperature delta between the regions. It recalculates the final number based on air density and pressure for a given temperature and elevation.
7-8whp difference between your guys' final numbers. 2-3% difference, for any number of other variables, including run-to-run variations. It's not that impossible to believe.
Terry
08-30-2009, 05:42 PM
#27
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ajax, On
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They tried to raise my revlimiter twice now to no avail. After seeing where the torque comes on and the HP peaks it seems like it would be a waste of time anyways. I too track my car, HPDE only, no races. Hoping to get it out to the 1/4 mile in Sept. That will prove the real numbers. A dyno to me is just for tuning. Way to many variables to base all information on that alone. But atleast it provides one an 'idea' of how much power they are making.
08-30-2009, 09:17 PM
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-31-2009, 04:14 AM
#30
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hit 284rwhp and lil over 250 tq with just injen CAI and greddy Ti-C dual and uprev tune on 93 at S&R in Tampa FL, on there dynomite. I asked around and they all told me the dynomite is the same as a dynojet.
I'm waiting to order my HFC to see if it pushes me over 295... then I mite do headers.
I'm waiting to order my HFC to see if it pushes me over 295... then I mite do headers.
08-31-2009, 12:33 PM
#36
HUH?!
These cars have been Dyno Tuned all over the place not just one shop!
I am hoping to experiment with cams over the winter. Will try the 268 grind & re-tune.
These cars have been Dyno Tuned all over the place not just one shop!
I am hoping to experiment with cams over the winter. Will try the 268 grind & re-tune.
08-31-2009, 12:53 PM
#37
That's is not true....it is very probable some one will.
You, phenom and one more that I can't think of (aside from A.H and I won't even get started on that garbage) were all tuned at that magic dyno in NY. You made like 26X on a dynapack and with the same mods baselined ~310 on this dyno. Come on now.
You, phenom and one more that I can't think of (aside from A.H and I won't even get started on that garbage) were all tuned at that magic dyno in NY. You made like 26X on a dynapack and with the same mods baselined ~310 on this dyno. Come on now.
HUH
Dude use Screen names! I assume your talking about me....I had a base of 265 WHP on a sh*tty dynopack running lean. After several hours tuning with a base of 302 on a Mustang the car then put down 314 WHP!!!! A Mustang dyno is more true to life. Wheels on the car under load.
edit:
The shop never stated how many pulls they ran on the Dynopack and also never hooked up a wideband. So I rule out thier results completely as to me they are not creditable.........
Last edited by Lakeside; 08-31-2009 at 12:56 PM.
08-31-2009, 12:55 PM
#38
HUH Dude use Screen names! I assume your talking about me....
I had a base of 265 WHP on a sh*tty dynopack running lean. After several hours tuning with a base of 302 on a Mustang the car then put down 314 WHP!!!! A Mustang dyno is more true to life. Wheels on the car under load.
Dude use Screen names! I assume your talking about me....I had a base of 265 WHP on a sh*tty dynopack running lean. After several hours tuning with a base of 302 on a Mustang the car then put down 314 WHP!!!! A Mustang dyno is more true to life. Wheels on the car under load.
08-31-2009, 01:00 PM
#39
HUH Dude use Screen names! I assume your talking about me....
I had a base of 265 WHP on a sh*tty dynopack running lean. After several hours tuning with a base of 302 on a Mustang the car then put down 314 WHP!!!! A Mustang dyno is more true to life. Wheels on the car under load.
Dude use Screen names! I assume your talking about me....I had a base of 265 WHP on a sh*tty dynopack running lean. After several hours tuning with a base of 302 on a Mustang the car then put down 314 WHP!!!! A Mustang dyno is more true to life. Wheels on the car under load.
Last edited by 03threefiftyz; 08-31-2009 at 01:21 PM.
