Notices
VQ35HR Mods and Support related to the 2007/08 High Revving VQ

$3500 Reality Check

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 04:54 AM
  #81  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by biggersNISMO
^^^ but we will never know the benefit of E85 on a NA Z until someone tries it... That's where I come in bro. I don't care if I lose money doing it. Im just gonna try it and report back after the Holidays.
it's been done before, one person in Florida has an NA built track car running E85
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 06:07 AM
  #82  
biggersNISMO's Avatar
biggersNISMO
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: South Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
it's been done before, one person in Florida has an NA built track car running E85
Thanks, I'll look around and try and find that thread.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 06:19 AM
  #83  
biggersNISMO's Avatar
biggersNISMO
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: South Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by bardabe
you should see some nice gains, E85 burns much cooler . you should be able to run allot more agressive timing without having the EGT's through the roof also allot harder to knock (obviously) make sure you tune the cam phasing overlap that is where most of the power is made. Keeping the flow velocity is what makes N/A power.

I was able to make an extra 30 Ponies out of a Tune Alone.
That's the plan. I want to be aggressive as possible. Overall, it's just better "performance fuel" I'm after. The 91 Octane crap is getting boring... Lol

Last edited by biggersNISMO; Dec 7, 2010 at 06:21 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:39 AM
  #84  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Cramming a ton of timing into the car without the addition of significant compression (and the trimmings to make such a setup effective) has next to 0 net effect on power. Might give you some benefit at altitude, but requires a completely revised fuel system and mapping
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:52 AM
  #85  
biggersNISMO's Avatar
biggersNISMO
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 551
Likes: 1
From: South Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
Cramming a ton of timing into the car without the addition of significant compression (and the trimmings to make such a setup effective) has next to 0 net effect on power. Might give you some benefit at altitude, but requires a completely revised fuel system and mapping
Thanks Adam. I value your input. I'll talk to my tuner about it.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 09:06 AM
  #86  
andre12031948's Avatar
andre12031948
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
From: monticello new york 12701
Default Except for Z1-do you guys know what retirding/advancing timing means?

Just curious.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 09:34 AM
  #87  
AadosX's Avatar
AadosX
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, AL
Default

I blame your tune.

Either way, yeah.. you're not going to get a lot of HP out of bolt-ons on just about ANY quality N/A car. But the reason your $/HP ratio sucks so bad is because you bought "baller" parts. Surely you realize that an exhaust is pretty much an exhaust from a power stand point. Yours is probably just shinier and might sound better.. that's what you paid for, not the HP.

My $400 TurboXS exhaust put me within about 10 WHP of stock 370Z's (you do the math) and I still have my cats in too. Plus I absolutely love how it sounds. Not too bad IMO.

But like I said, I blame your tune. From just about every thread I've seen on here (this is of course just speculation until I do the mods and dyno myself), intakes/exhaust/tune (which you can easily do for under $1500) should net you a good 25-35 WHP... so something aint right there. =P

Last edited by AadosX; Dec 7, 2010 at 09:35 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 12:18 PM
  #88  
Q8y_drifter's Avatar
Q8y_drifter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Kuwait
Default

I did about 240whp stock (G35 HR sedan). With Injen CAI, Invidia HFC, Stillen CBE and Uprev tune I made 270whp. That's a 30whp gain for around $2.5K

I could have gained that 30whp with only $2K simply by getting cheaper parts ($200 test pipes, $900 catback, $400 CAI, $500 tune)
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 07:59 AM
  #89  
srsairbags's Avatar
srsairbags
New Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Austin TX
Default

this thread just depresses me . . . . where are the 300 hp HR NA mods guys ? ?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 08:16 AM
  #90  
BonesZ33's Avatar
BonesZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

thats why i bought very very cheap n/a mods..

LT headers=250$
used kinetix v+ plenum 150$
used popcharger= 60$


I know HR parts are more expensive and harder to come by, but the concept is the same
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 09:33 AM
  #91  
Smackin's Avatar
Smackin
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Monterey, Cali
Default

Im happy with my mods... im NA making 290hp
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 10:29 AM
  #92  
2004Black350z's Avatar
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
Premier Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,097
Likes: 17
From: NC
Default

Again comparing dyno numbers are stupid unless its the same day etc. Look at gains aainst baseline. Not total

Last edited by 2004Black350z; Dec 9, 2010 at 11:49 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 11:42 AM
  #93  
srsairbags's Avatar
srsairbags
New Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Austin TX
Default

why is it that i hear again and again that osiris makes more hp/mod than Cobb ? ? ? . . and i dont think comparing hp to $$$ spend is the right thing to do . . . you also get less weight, better throttle response, sweet sound etc . . .
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #94  
Nismo1534's Avatar
Nismo1534
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 605
Likes: 1
From: Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by 2004Black350z
Again comparing dump numbers are stupid unless its the same day etc. Look at gains against baseline. Not total
Absolutely true. Surgeline's dyno reads low, so I could assume my numbers may be up to 290whp on another dyno. Sadly, the minimal gain of 10whp from my baseline after all the NA mods is definitely a pain in my side.

Originally Posted by srsairbags
why is it that i hear again and again that osiris makes more hp/mod than Cobb ? ? ? . . and i dont think comparing hp to $$$ spend is the right thing to do . . . you also get less weight, better throttle response, sweet sound etc . . .
You bring up some good points here. Unfortunately I do not know enough about the actual tuning of the vehicle to know if/why they differ. My only question is, if you are having a professional tuner adjust your car's map and power curve, why would it matter what brand you go with? Is there something Osiris does or offers that Cobb cannot support? I've never seen a side-by-side comparison, I just have heard that Osiris is more popular for the Z platform. Sure Osiris may have more fancy features, making it the #1 choice, but when it comes down to the raw tuning of the curve, is there any difference?

And you are right, $$$ spent/hp is negligible. There are people spending upwards of $6k for catback exhausts, I understand this. I am just showing that you can get easily get caught up in NA upgrades, which is not very appropriate with power in mind. It was a reality check for me and, hopefully, an eye opener for the rest of the community.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 01:29 PM
  #95  
BenchTT's Avatar
BenchTT
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Atlantic City
Default

From my previous post May '10 (cleaned up)

Berk HFC 7.6whp 6.29wtq and then another 5.36whp 3.82wtq with uprev tune which was done last. OEM intakes. Total 285.93whp 257.40wtq all on same dynojet same day. About $2200 spent for 12.96whp and 10.11wtq

$500 turboxs exhaust installed
$500 berk hfc shipped
$901.00 osiris and cipher w/cable and tune
+ Dyno before and after each with the shop labor for install. Cost $243 for HFC install and dyno before and after. Can't find other receipt for exhaust but I think it was $60.
Total = $2204 not a lot of $ but a waste of $.

Last edited by BenchTT; Dec 9, 2010 at 01:30 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 02:33 PM
  #96  
AadosX's Avatar
AadosX
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, AL
Default

Ok you guys made me want to do some math. Your numbers are saddening. =(

Like I said I dyno'd my car post exhaust at a 370Z dyno day and every stock 370Z was getting about 10 whp more than my car.

370Z Stock 332 crank hp was dynoing 282 whp so that's a 15% drivetrain loss on that dyno.

With the same 15% loss on the same dyno, same day.. according to my calculations I would have gotten 260 whp (down from 306 at the crank). I dyno'd 271 so that's an 11 whp gain from my exhaust, and I still have the cats!

So in other words my exhaust is basically giving me the same gains as you guys are getting from exhaust, testpipes/hfc's, AND a tune? If not intakes too? LOL I guess I'll just stick with the exhaust. Like I said, I hope to get another 20 wheel at least after intakes and a tune.

Maybe my math method here is ghetto but it seems legit to me? =P Other than the possibility that the 350Z has a more efficient drivetrain or something.. but that seems unlikely IMO.

Last edited by AadosX; Dec 9, 2010 at 02:35 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 02:46 PM
  #97  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by AadosX
I blame your tune.

Either way, yeah.. you're not going to get a lot of HP out of bolt-ons on just about ANY quality N/A car. But the reason your $/HP ratio sucks so bad is because you bought "baller" parts. Surely you realize that an exhaust is pretty much an exhaust from a power stand point. Yours is probably just shinier and might sound better.. that's what you paid for, not the HP.

My $400 TurboXS exhaust put me within about 10 WHP of stock 370Z's (you do the math) and I still have my cats in too. Plus I absolutely love how it sounds. Not too bad IMO.

But like I said, I blame your tune. From just about every thread I've seen on here (this is of course just speculation until I do the mods and dyno myself), intakes/exhaust/tune (which you can easily do for under $1500) should net you a good 25-35 WHP... so something aint right there. =P
Thats a pretty impressive set-up. Most likely you will want to post your time here: https://my350z.com/forum/drag/233840-top-25-1-4-mile-times-for-tt-st-supercharger-nitrous-bolt-ons-stock.html
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #98  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by BenchTT
From my previous post May '10 (cleaned up)

Berk HFC 7.6whp 6.29wtq and then another 5.36whp 3.82wtq with uprev tune which was done last. OEM intakes. Total 285.93whp 257.40wtq all on same dynojet same day. About $2200 spent for 12.96whp and 10.11wtq

$500 turboxs exhaust installed
$500 berk hfc shipped
$901.00 osiris and cipher w/cable and tune
+ Dyno before and after each with the shop labor for install. Cost $243 for HFC install and dyno before and after. Can't find other receipt for exhaust but I think it was $60.
Total = $2204 not a lot of $ but a waste of $.
Thats a pretty impressive set-up. Most likely you will want to post your time here: https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=233840
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #99  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Smackin
Im happy with my mods... im NA making 290hp
Thats a pretty impressive set-up. Most likely you will want to post your time here: https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=233840
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2010 | 02:49 PM
  #100  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Q8y_drifter
I did about 240whp stock (G35 HR sedan). With Injen CAI, Invidia HFC, Stillen CBE and Uprev tune I made 270whp. That's a 30whp gain for around $2.5K

I could have gained that 30whp with only $2K simply by getting cheaper parts ($200 test pipes, $900 catback, $400 CAI, $500 tune)
Thats a pretty impressive set-up. Most likely you will want to post your time here: https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=233840
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:35 AM.