pics: 255 on 9.5+22 / 285 on 10.5+22
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bay Area to Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
pics: 255 on 9.5+22 / 285 on 10.5+22
Had some folks asking to post pics of this setup. Finally got around to taking the pics. I did have to roll the fenders for this setup. Sorry for the quality of the pics, I took them in my office's garage.
Last edited by apharmdb; 03-13-2005 at 07:23 PM.
#2
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by apharmdb
Had some folks asking to post pics of this setup. Finally got around to taking the pics. I did have to roll the fenders for this setup. Sorry for the quality of the pics, I took them in my office's garage.
#6
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
thanks
Thanks for this post, gives me some better understanding. I am not that great with tire knowledge, but I want my rear tire to be sunken in just a fraction more than yours, so, do I go with a few mm offset more than 22 or less? I know stupid question, but please help me. BEN
#7
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bay Area to Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NP, and it's not a stupid question at all. If you want the rears to be more tucked in, you'll need to go with a higher offset. Something like +30 might be what you are looking for. Also keep in mind that my rear wheel is 10.5 inches wide whereas most folks go with a 9.5 inch wheel. Good luck with the wheel search and make sure to post some pics when you get them on.
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bay Area to Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tires are BFG KDW's and the lip in the front is much smaller than the rear. There is a 9.5 inch wheel with a lip but the offset is +12. Only seen folks running this in the rears, never the front so I don't know if it will work out.
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: El Campo, TX
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I run a 9.5/10.5 setup with those exact same tire sizes (and brand) but my offsets are +29 f/r - I'm lowered about an inch, but do NOT have any rubbing issues in the front or rear (the reason I tried this setup) - it's crazy that only a 7mm difference can mean the difference between rubbing and not rubbing...
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wish me luck guys my tires where delivered today 265-30-19 & 295-30-19 michellin ps2,,I have the racinghart cpftune 19 inch. Front 9 inch- rear 10.5 dunno offset but i grinded the hell out of my fenders and sanded them down so looks very clean. I will put on tires this sunday ...i hope it doesnt rubbbbb
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: norcal
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are you lowered? do you think if you wnet 275/35 in the rear you would have to still roll fenders?
BTW i really like the 10.5 +22 because of the lip you get but i ended up ordering 9.5+22 for my rears just to be safe and not deal with the whole rubbing and rolling fenders buisness
BTW i really like the 10.5 +22 because of the lip you get but i ended up ordering 9.5+22 for my rears just to be safe and not deal with the whole rubbing and rolling fenders buisness
#15
Registered User
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bwzabodyn
I run a 9.5/10.5 setup with those exact same tire sizes (and brand) but my offsets are +29 f/r - I'm lowered about an inch, but do NOT have any rubbing issues in the front or rear (the reason I tried this setup) - it's crazy that only a 7mm difference can mean the difference between rubbing and not rubbing...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zland
Wheels & Tires
2
11-10-2002 09:07 AM