Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

Handling Difference between 255/40/18 295/40/18 vs 255/35/19 295/35/19

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2008, 12:13 AM
  #1  
zBear
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
zBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NorCal (510)
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Handling Difference between 255/40/18 295/40/18 vs 255/35/19 295/35/19

I am debating whether to stay 18s or go 19s and have a question.

I know 18s are going to be faster than 19s in straight line acceleration because they are lighter, but how would the same setup handle in turns and slaloms? Would 19s hold the road less efficiently than 18s? I don't think they would, but lets see what the tire gods say.

Last edited by zBear; 08-15-2008 at 01:48 AM.
Old 08-15-2008, 02:33 AM
  #2  
Z04
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Z04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Clarksville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,612
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the front is a 0.04% diameter difference and the rear is 0.63% diameter difference. so basically, it will be nothing you will notice at all since those tires are pretty close
Old 08-15-2008, 06:04 AM
  #3  
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (8)
 
terrasmak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 28,759
Received 2,327 Likes on 1,675 Posts
Default

Should be the same depending on surface. The surface could change either one better or worst.
Old 08-15-2008, 02:02 PM
  #4  
Spike100
New Member
 
Spike100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edina, Minnesota
Posts: 7,337
Received 203 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

As terrasmak says, you won't notice a difference in handling. The 18" setup will provide a slightly more comfortable ride (cushioned by the slightly higher sidewall... but those widths hold a lot of air, so even the comfort-factor approaches negligible). The 19" wheels will look better.

I'm not sure about acceleration and the the weight difference. I'm guessing acceleration will be less with the 19's".

--Spike
Old 08-16-2008, 10:47 AM
  #5  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

there is really no way to answer this question

the handling difference will come as a result of the specific tire you are talking about, the alignment specs of the car, the width and offset of the wheel they are being installed on. The size stamped on the side is the least important aspect of whether it will handle better or not
Old 08-16-2008, 11:28 AM
  #6  
zBear
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
zBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NorCal (510)
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
there is really no way to answer this question

the handling difference will come as a result of the specific tire you are talking about, the alignment specs of the car, the width and offset of the wheel they are being installed on. The size stamped on the side is the least important aspect of whether it will handle better or not
Assuming everything is the same other than wheel size and tires size, for example:

18in TE37 9.5/10.5 +22 all around
255/40/18 295/40/18
Michelin PS2
Alignment F -1.3 Camber/R -1.5 Camber/0 Toe

19in TE37 9.5/10.5 +22 all around
255/35/19 295/35/19
Michelin PS2
Alignment F -1.3 Camber/R -1.5 Camber/0 Toe

Am I going to lose that much handling running 19s over 18s? 18s are no doubt the better setup if you want all out performance. But 19s just look better on the street.
Old 08-17-2008, 06:22 AM
  #7  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

first, not sure who suggested those sizes, but they are way out of whack. On your 18 inch example, it's way too much stagger, and you'll upset traction control and vdc. It's also going to look quite goofy with it's huge sidewall. I recomend you keep front to rear stagger to under 3% total difference, just as the factory does.

same goes for your second tire choice sizes...they are too off base, over 4% difference, which is no good

255/35 front and 285/35 rear would be ideal in an 18

265/30 or 275/30 front, 295/30 rear would both work well in a 19. Or, 265/35 front, 285/35 rear in a 19 also would work

I run 265/30 front, 285/30 rear on my own car, for a bit over a year now, and it works great
Old 08-17-2008, 06:22 AM
  #8  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

best bet is to play around with a tire calculator ^
Old 08-17-2008, 03:13 PM
  #9  
zBear
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
zBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NorCal (510)
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
first, not sure who suggested those sizes, but they are way out of whack. On your 18 inch example, it's way too much stagger, and you'll upset traction control and vdc. It's also going to look quite goofy with it's huge sidewall. I recomend you keep front to rear stagger to under 3% total difference, just as the factory does.

same goes for your second tire choice sizes...they are too off base, over 4% difference, which is no good

255/35 front and 285/35 rear would be ideal in an 18

265/30 or 275/30 front, 295/30 rear would both work well in a 19. Or, 265/35 front, 285/35 rear in a 19 also would work

I run 265/30 front, 285/30 rear on my own car, for a bit over a year now, and it works great
I'm currently running 265/35-18, 285/35-18, but wanted to up the rear to 295 for more traction and lower the front a little for less heavy steering. I wanted to go as wide as possible in the rear without having to do any crazy camber and 295 looks like the ideal choice.

I came up with the numbers myself using the Tire Size calculator here and they came out like this.

Stock
F 225/45-18
R 245/45-18

Original Tire Choices: % Compared to Stock
F 255/40-18 +0.2%
R 295/40-18 +2.3%

F 255/35-19 +0.2%
R 295/35-19 +1.7%

Your Suggested Choices: % Compared to Stock
F 255/35-18 -3.6%
R 285/35-18 -3.1%

F 265/30-19 -2.7%
F 275/30-19 -1.8%
R 295/30-19 -2.7%

F 265/35-19 +1.3%
R 285/35-19 +0.6%

I was trying to keep tire sizing as close as possible to stock, so I was going with 40 profile for 18s and 35 profile for 19s.

If I'm reading correctly between the lines, then I should be OK running 265/35-19, 295/35-19 or if I stick with 18s then 265/40-18, 295/40-18, just keep my stagger closer to stock.

You're running 265/30, 285/30. Are you running 30 profile because it's help tire flex?

Last edited by zBear; 08-17-2008 at 03:25 PM.
Old 08-17-2008, 03:24 PM
  #10  
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Z1 Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

You are wanting to keep the overall rolling diameter of front to back to under 3%

265/35/19 and 295/35/19 is a difference of 3.03%....which is just out of what you want

My setup, for example, is a 1.87% stagger.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
04-04-2016 07:52 AM
MicVelo
NorCal Marketplace
9
10-04-2015 07:55 PM
350z82
Exterior & Interior
19
10-01-2015 06:25 PM



Quick Reply: Handling Difference between 255/40/18 295/40/18 vs 255/35/19 295/35/19



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:11 AM.