Notices
Wheels & Tires 350Z Rollers and Rubbers

+12 versus +22 19x10.5 TE37?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #1  
AlvinHuyN's Avatar
AlvinHuyN
Thread Starter
Nismo 370Z #697
Premier Member
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,580
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles
Default +12 versus +22 19x10.5 TE37?

Hey guys, I'm trying to find pics and info on the +12 TE37. I know a lot of you guys run them here but is there a face concaveness and lip size difference? I want to go +12 but I can't justify it unless it's different, otherwise I'd just run kics spacers and it'll be the same thing. I like having the front at the +22 because the back will look more aggressive so I don't need to go +12 fronts, just rears
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 09:33 AM
  #2  
lgear080's Avatar
lgear080
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 1
From: MIAMI
Default

Are you referring to fronts or rears? I can sort you out with what you're looking for.
I am running 19x9.5" +12 up front and 19x10.5" +22 (w/ a 10mm spacer).
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #3  
AlvinHuyN's Avatar
AlvinHuyN
Thread Starter
Nismo 370Z #697
Premier Member
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,580
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by lgear080
Are you referring to fronts or rears? I can sort you out with what you're looking for.
I am running 19x9.5" +12 up front and 19x10.5" +22 (w/ a 10mm spacer).
I'm talking about the rears. You're doing the exact thing I might end up doing: +22 - 10mm spacer = +12 but I was wondering if the actual 19x10.5+12 te37 looks any different than the +22 in terms of how concave the spokes are and the lip size.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #4  
aloh's Avatar
aloh
New Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 3
From: socal
Default

I believe the lip is bigger, but im not sure about the concave-ness.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #5  
Crom's Avatar
Crom
Registered User
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 2
From: Huntington Beach
Default

+12 front and +22 rears are ideal if you're looking for the nice front lip and traction in the back w/o serious fender mods.. other wise just go either one or the other. - here's a link to my +12's The +12's are slightly more concave but not that much.

https://my350z.com/forum/media-share...w-rollerz.html

Last edited by Crom; Aug 28, 2009 at 09:56 AM.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 09:57 AM
  #6  
lgear080's Avatar
lgear080
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 1
From: MIAMI
Default

I have not measured them, however I believe the only difference is the concavity
of the spokes. This must be where Rays picks up the extra distance... My issue with
the +12s is brake fitment. Watch where you're going with this, although I've got a
relatively unique scenario playing out.

For the record (4) 19x10.5" merc silver te-37s in +22 sold for $1675 on ebay last sunday. WTF.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #7  
aloh's Avatar
aloh
New Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 3
From: socal
Default

WAT. $1675? What a steal...

But anyway, the +12's in Crom's pics look like they have bigger lips then my +22's. I cant really notice if the concavity is more though.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 10:35 AM
  #8  
tnk210's Avatar
tnk210
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Originally Posted by lgear080
I have not measured them, however I believe the only difference is the concavity
of the spokes. This must be where Rays picks up the extra distance... My issue with
the +12s is brake fitment. Watch where you're going with this, although I've got a
relatively unique scenario playing out.

For the record (4) 19x10.5" merc silver te-37s in +22 sold for $1675 on ebay last sunday. WTF.
Brake fitment issues? I haven't seen anyone have any issues between Crom, Rickdogg and myself. Three distinct kits that fit no problem. The TE's are designed for the BBK.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #9  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

they make up the extra offset by just having a thicker hub. exact same overall result as if you used a spacer
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 11:11 AM
  #10  
Twenty4's Avatar
Twenty4
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: newbury park, CA
Default

these are +12 face. notice more lip


these are +22 offset. same concavity. less lip.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 11:33 AM
  #11  
lgear080's Avatar
lgear080
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 1
From: MIAMI
Default

I meant my bbk tnks
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #12  
Kwame's Avatar
Kwame
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 19
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by tnk210
Brake fitment issues? I haven't seen anyone have any issues between Crom, Rickdogg and myself. Three distinct kits that fit no problem. The TE's are designed for the BBK.
The fronts didn't quite "clear" my brakes either.



Originally Posted by str8dum1
they make up the extra offset by just having a thicker hub. exact same overall result as if you used a spacer
That is actually not correct. I'm sure there is some more material on the hub, but it is definitely slightly more concave and the lip is slightly bigger than a +22.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #13  
lgear080's Avatar
lgear080
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,541
Likes: 1
From: MIAMI
Default

thanks and thanks. kwame is an encyclopedia.

wtf do you do to repair the finish on an endless bbk? re-anodize?
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #14  
tnk210's Avatar
tnk210
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Learned something new!
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #15  
AlvinHuyN's Avatar
AlvinHuyN
Thread Starter
Nismo 370Z #697
Premier Member
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,580
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
they make up the extra offset by just having a thicker hub. exact same overall result as if you used a spacer
SWEET! That's exactly what I was hoping to hear I didn't want buy new rear wheels unless it was going to look different. Since it's just the hub, the spacers are going on asap

As for the front I'm not looking to switch them up because I prefer the +22 in the front to show off the concaveness in the rears more I like that the front looks different so that it doesn't look like an awd setup.

Last edited by AlvinHuyN; Aug 28, 2009 at 01:07 PM.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #16  
tnk210's Avatar
tnk210
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Except he's wrong
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 01:52 PM
  #17  
AlvinHuyN's Avatar
AlvinHuyN
Thread Starter
Nismo 370Z #697
Premier Member
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,580
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by tnk210
Except he's wrong
boo...we need side by side comparison before i spring for new mag bluesss
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 01:58 PM
  #18  
Crom's Avatar
Crom
Registered User
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 2
From: Huntington Beach
Default

Originally Posted by AlvinHuyN
boo...we need side by side comparison before i spring for new mag bluesss
I can snap a pic...
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 02:01 PM
  #19  
tnk210's Avatar
tnk210
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

I'll take some dirty mag pictures when I get home.
Old Aug 28, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #20  
Motormouth's Avatar
Motormouth
Banned
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,190
Likes: 3
From: not here
Default

the change is all in the lip. not really noticeably different concavity on 19 inch versions.

Last edited by Motormouth; Aug 28, 2009 at 02:09 PM.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:54 PM.