Dyno'd the 5AT
01-15-2005, 04:18 PM
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chula Vista, CA
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Tsex On 19s
How much lower is that compared to a stock 6mt? Automatics have a huge power loss due to the tranny.. cause dang those numbers really show it.
How much lower is that compared to a stock 6mt? Automatics have a huge power loss due to the tranny.. cause dang those numbers really show it.
-Mark
01-15-2005, 05:40 PM
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chula Vista, CA
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by JonsilvZ
Who cares about the dyno. Look at my stock #s
Who cares about the dyno. Look at my stock #s
-Mark
01-15-2005, 11:09 PM
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That looks like a low-end rating for the auto... I've seen them closer to 230 in whp, and around 220 in wtq. For comparo, my baseline is a low-end number for a manual -- 230whp/230wtq.
01-15-2005, 11:32 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: you'd Like to know
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
phh, my stock 5AT dynoed at 234/228
dont spread bull about ATs being slower than MTs. With the Z, it isnt true at all.
That dyno probably just reads low!
dont spread bull about ATs being slower than MTs. With the Z, it isnt true at all.
That dyno probably just reads low!
Trending Topics
01-16-2005, 05:08 AM
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chula Vista, CA
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see a lot of people throwing around numbers without stating the correction factor. I can throw up my STD corrected graph with no smoothing and show 230hp right now. SAE + 5 smoothing on WinPEP is going to be the lowest reading, but it is what I have always based my vehicles on.
Also, that was the 3rd run in a back to back to back. The first 2 were wasted because they didn't have their tach lead on right and the operator ended the runs around 5800 RPM
-Mark
Also, that was the 3rd run in a back to back to back. The first 2 were wasted because they didn't have their tach lead on right and the operator ended the runs around 5800 RPM
-Mark
01-16-2005, 05:27 AM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by STL Lightning
I see a lot of people throwing around numbers without stating the correction factor. I can throw up my STD corrected graph with no smoothing and show 230hp right now. SAE + 5 smoothing on WinPEP is going to be the lowest reading, but it is what I have always based my vehicles on.
Also, that was the 3rd run in a back to back to back. The first 2 were wasted because they didn't have their tach lead on right and the operator ended the runs around 5800 RPM
-Mark
I see a lot of people throwing around numbers without stating the correction factor. I can throw up my STD corrected graph with no smoothing and show 230hp right now. SAE + 5 smoothing on WinPEP is going to be the lowest reading, but it is what I have always based my vehicles on.
Also, that was the 3rd run in a back to back to back. The first 2 were wasted because they didn't have their tach lead on right and the operator ended the runs around 5800 RPM
-Mark
01-16-2005, 05:40 AM
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chula Vista, CA
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FairladyZ
Werd, thats why I dont even bother putting stuff on here. Nice truck btw. My buddy has one same color. He took those ricey looking tail lights and painted them, looks killer now.
Werd, thats why I dont even bother putting stuff on here. Nice truck btw. My buddy has one same color. He took those ricey looking tail lights and painted them, looks killer now.
01-16-2005, 08:28 AM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wenonah, NJ.
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STL Lightning, picture of your Z was taken at the track. What kind of times did you get if and when you ran it? I got a 13.89 on a Gtech/Pro. Good for baseline testing, but not like actually taking it to the track.
01-16-2005, 09:14 AM
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chula Vista, CA
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SteveZ33
STL Lightning, picture of your Z was taken at the track. What kind of times did you get if and when you ran it? I got a 13.89 on a Gtech/Pro. Good for baseline testing, but not like actually taking it to the track.
STL Lightning, picture of your Z was taken at the track. What kind of times did you get if and when you ran it? I got a 13.89 on a Gtech/Pro. Good for baseline testing, but not like actually taking it to the track.
-Mark
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seagrasser
Zs & Gs For Sale
6
10-11-2015 03:27 PM
