Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Gained 17RWHP & 10RWTQ N/A!!!

Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:44 AM
  #121  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Originally Posted by kj98r05
Absolutely and thank you for all the info. And by the way for the price i still think the gains are awesome and by far worth it.
Not a thang. LOL Stay tune for when I get a UTEC and tune.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:47 AM
  #122  
kj98r05's Avatar
kj98r05
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Not a thang. LOL Stay tune for when I get a UTEC and tune.
Will do thanks again
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:51 AM
  #123  
boostman's Avatar
boostman
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: denver
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Not a thang. LOL Stay tune for when I get a UTEC and tune.
UTEC is overrated!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:52 AM
  #124  
boostman's Avatar
boostman
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: denver
Default

Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 09:03 AM
  #125  
Resolute's Avatar
Resolute
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 3
From: @7000 ft
Default

Robert, good gains. You did your homework well and made impressive results with very little investment compared to other options for the Z. Thanks for hosting your before and after dynos, hopefully people will check them out and make a better decision about their options from it. As fas as the rest of this thread goes, all I can say is I'm in before the lock!
Will
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 09:06 AM
  #126  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Resolute
Robert, good gains. You did your homework well and made impressive results with very little investment compared to other options for the Z. Thanks for hosting your before and after dynos, hopefully people will check them out and make a better decision about their options from it. As fas as the rest of this thread goes, all I can say is I'm in before the lock!
Will
Your welcome. Let me know when you have some extra cash laying around and order some stuff. FYI: The car was very powerful at La Junta and brake fad came quickly on the stock pads & rotors.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 09:08 AM
  #127  
boostman's Avatar
boostman
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: denver
Default

Originally Posted by Resolute
Robert, good gains. You did your homework well and made impressive results with very little investment compared to other options for the Z. Thanks for hosting your before and after dynos, hopefully people will check them out and make a better decision about their options from it. As fas as the rest of this thread goes, all I can say is I'm in before the lock!
Will
"Oh yeah" stroke stroke "good power" stroke fondle "nice gains" stroke and I'm spent!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 04:04 AM
  #128  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Back to subject.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 06:01 AM
  #129  
NA350Z's Avatar
NA350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by boostman
first off... AWD has nothing other then loss of power to the drivetrain... RWD drive ownz all in real driving with twists and turns... AWD allows you to run fast 1/4s with no power so you can be cool with your .60 times.. Your evo would kill me on the launch but as soon as I start going... I pull right on by and make fun of you as your girlfriend tells you to buy a real car.

And with an evo that makes what 286 or so hp stock... I see that you like the 10 to 20 hp gain with tons of money...
I guess thats why the Skyline sucks so bad. I mean it got banned from several racing series just because it sucked so bad.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 06:07 AM
  #130  
NA350Z's Avatar
NA350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by boostman
first off... AWD has nothing other then loss of power to the drivetrain... RWD drive ownz all in real driving with twists and turns... AWD allows you to run fast 1/4s with no power so you can be cool with your .60 times.. Your evo would kill me on the launch but as soon as I start going... I pull right on by and make fun of you as your girlfriend tells you to buy a real car.

And with an evo that makes what 286 or so hp stock... I see that you like the 10 to 20 hp gain with tons of money...

And another thing, you have to spend loads of money on a Z to even be even with a BPU+ Evo. Dude you're nuts, think about it, how much do you have to spend on a Z to see a 10 second run at the track . . . 30-35K? Something in that neighborhood. How much do you have to spend on an Evo to see 10 second run at the track, 10K if that much at all, seeing a 10 second Evo at the track isnt that uncommon, I personally have a friend that makes 10s at Englishtown. Your rude and uneducated comments show how much you REALLY know about cars. Evos own Tsukuba circuit, not that the Z is a bad car, I own one, its just a well balanced car and an awesome looking one at that with history and heritage. Owning a Z is more than just racing around its about character. If you want a really fast car buy a Supra/Skyline now those are fast. And don't think you can knock me like I dont know about power, my last car was a 450 whp Supra. And I got link and pics to prove it.

Last edited by NA350Z; Mar 9, 2006 at 06:09 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #131  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Please don't get off topic.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #132  
NA350Z's Avatar
NA350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Please don't get off topic.
I meant to tell you great gains on that $800 by the way.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #133  
SilverstonE-O6's Avatar
SilverstonE-O6
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
Default

I pulled 271.8 whp and 261.7trq uncorrected last weekend on a dynojet uncorrected with the mods below.

I still need to figure out how to correct them, Im new to the whole dyno correction thing Looking for a SAE correction. N/A has always been my thing since I was 16. All my buddies drove Turbo cars and they always seemed to have problems, even on low boost. **** was leaking, spiking, breaking down. If I have a turbo car, it will be for the weekends, ill have a beater to drive around to work and stuff. Great numbers bro, Glad to see im not the only N/A Z on here, everyone seems to be turbo!!
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #134  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Good number but just can't beleive the MREV + Kit & a TD Cat-back give you 65 whp more. My uncorrected whp was 206.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 09:24 PM
  #135  
SilverstonE-O6's Avatar
SilverstonE-O6
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_K
Good number but just can't beleive the MREV + Kit & a TD Cat-back give you 65 whp more. My uncorrected whp was 206.
No no no lol, Uncorrected. SAE correction would bring it DOWN. Figure about 8-10whp/trq less. On my dyno sheet from a DYNOJET, it says "uncorrected" SAE correction would bring my numbers down about 8-10. So figure 261.8whp and 251.7 trq. Those should be my true numbers. I have yet to tune it with a UTEC or get it reflashed. You know the MREV+kit comes with the 5/16th spacer and the Machined lower collector? It produces crazy power for what it is.

Last edited by SilverstonE-O6; Mar 9, 2006 at 09:27 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 06:37 AM
  #136  
boostman's Avatar
boostman
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: denver
Default

Originally Posted by NA350Z
And another thing, you have to spend loads of money on a Z to even be even with a BPU+ Evo. Dude you're nuts, think about it, how much do you have to spend on a Z to see a 10 second run at the track . . . 30-35K? Something in that neighborhood. How much do you have to spend on an Evo to see 10 second run at the track, 10K if that much at all, seeing a 10 second Evo at the track isnt that uncommon, I personally have a friend that makes 10s at Englishtown. Your rude and uneducated comments show how much you REALLY know about cars. Evos own Tsukuba circuit, not that the Z is a bad car, I own one, its just a well balanced car and an awesome looking one at that with history and heritage. Owning a Z is more than just racing around its about character. If you want a really fast car buy a Supra/Skyline now those are fast. And don't think you can knock me like I dont know about power, my last car was a 450 whp Supra. And I got link and pics to prove it.
youre a tool...
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 03:20 PM
  #137  
NA350Z's Avatar
NA350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,290
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by boostman
youre a tool...
You're the one with 24 posts A$$HOLE, you just joined and you think you can come on the board and run things, dont think so, now get back to the topic. And also, try to spell your words right. Last time I checked "you are" shortened was spelled "you're" and not "youre".

Last edited by NA350Z; Mar 10, 2006 at 11:20 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 04:46 PM
  #138  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Originally Posted by SilverstonE-O6
No no no lol, Uncorrected. SAE correction would bring it DOWN. Figure about 8-10whp/trq less. On my dyno sheet from a DYNOJET, it says "uncorrected" SAE correction would bring my numbers down about 8-10. So figure 261.8whp and 251.7 trq. Those should be my true numbers. I have yet to tune it with a UTEC or get it reflashed. You know the MREV+kit comes with the 5/16th spacer and the Machined lower collector? It produces crazy power for what it is.
I just relized that you have an '06 with the 300hp engine. LOL Sorry for the confusion. Congrats on your numbers! Whats next?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 08:24 PM
  #139  
SilverstonE-O6's Avatar
SilverstonE-O6
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, MD
Default

Upgraded axles, Snapped mine last weekend at the track Im a moron. But anyways, UTEC definitely comes next. 10-15whp gain with a good UTEC tune. But its $$$$$$$, it will be worth it though.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 03:09 AM
  #140  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Thread Starter
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

OUCH!!! I remember when I broke my front diff in my old Evo. I wasn't in the best of moods after.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 PM.