Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

hp + torque curve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2002 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
N4Spd's Avatar
N4Spd
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Default hp + torque curve

check this out:

http://www.internetabyss.com/my350z/...ue%20Curve.pdf
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2002 | 11:37 AM
  #2  
BrianZ's Avatar
BrianZ
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default Re: hp + torque curve

Originally posted by N4Spd
check this out:

http://www.internetabyss.com/my350z/...ue%20Curve.pdf
Yeah. And?
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2002 | 05:13 PM
  #3  
Pathy01's Avatar
Pathy01
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default More torque off idle than s2000's max

Nice to see that the Z has more torque off idle than the S2000's peak torque.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2002 | 09:08 PM
  #4  
crayons's Avatar
crayons
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

Nice to see that the Z has more torque off idle than the S2000's peak torque.
Then again, the S2000 is a i-4 2.0 liter engine which was designed for high-revving fun... whereas the 350z is a huge 3.5 liter block (with a max of 276 lb-ft of torque for that matter). Why even make the comparison? .
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2002 | 10:12 PM
  #5  
LowFuel's Avatar
LowFuel
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Because they are similarly priced sports cars, I think.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 12:03 AM
  #6  
Pathy01's Avatar
Pathy01
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default Reasoning

I'm comparing to the S2000 based on the questions about the Z being sluggish, and those saying that other cars including the s2000 have never been considerred sluggish. I have very often heard driving an s2000 below 5000rpm similar to driving a civic, so I'd say that sounds sluggish. Just tired of all the whiners saying the Z isn't going to compare favorably.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 01:14 PM
  #7  
crayons's Avatar
crayons
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

[B]Because they are similarly priced sports cars, I think. [B]
I'm comparing to the S2000 based on the questions about the Z being sluggish, and those saying that other cars including the s2000 have never been considerred sluggish. I have very often heard driving an s2000 below 5000rpm similar to driving a civic, so I'd say that sounds sluggish. Just tired of all the whiners saying the Z isn't going to compare favorably.
Those are actually pretty "duh" answers, I must have been tired or something when I posted my previous response. Thanks for not flaming . And yeah, I heard about that review where they said the 350z is sluggish... I really doubt that also. With a 0-60 time of 5.4 (measured by C&D with a pre-production car that weighed in at around 3350 lbs.. which means that the production cars will be just a tad quicker since they weigh in at an average of 3200 lbs), and 180-some-odd lb-ft of torque off idle, I think the 350z will be able to provide some kick in the butt.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 06:49 PM
  #8  
EnthuZ's Avatar
EnthuZ
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
Default

Don't put a lot of credence into that graph. HP & Torque ALWAYS are equal at 5252 rpm. This graph crosses at 5600, give or take.

Yes, I know it comes from Nisson's web site, but they are not always perfect.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 08:59 PM
  #9  
Pathy01's Avatar
Pathy01
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default Why they don't cross at 5252

If you look at the graph, the HP and Torque scales are different, if you look at the torque around 5252, and the HP at 5252, you'll see they are right about the same number, so I'd say it's legit.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 09:58 PM
  #10  
Goober's Avatar
Goober
Charter Member #57
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Default

Showing my ignorance....

Why do the two curves always cross at 5252rpm?
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 10:11 PM
  #11  
crayons's Avatar
crayons
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

Basically it stems from the fact that one ft-lb of torque at 5252 rpm is equal to 33,000 ft-lbs per minute of work, and that's equal to one horsepower. The equation is:

horsepower = (torque * RPM)/5252

And so from that equation, when the RPM is equal to 5252, the torque will equal the horsepower. And that's the case for every single dyno sheet .

... ah.. that's the only piece of Physics that I'll ever care about .
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 10:16 PM
  #12  
Goober's Avatar
Goober
Charter Member #57
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Default

Looks like I need to brush up on my Physics!

Thanks for the great briefing question that I get to use on my student aviators now!
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2002 | 10:22 PM
  #13  
crayons's Avatar
crayons
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

No problem .
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EnjukuRacing
Engine
0
Sep 30, 2015 06:55 AM
RWDBajan
Maintenance & Repair
22
Sep 17, 2015 04:52 PM
z350z
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
1
Jul 20, 2002 11:42 PM
no_jalopy
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
8
Jul 19, 2002 07:41 AM
droideka
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
4
Jun 11, 2002 04:54 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:12 AM.