Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

2007 350z speculations?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2006, 06:56 AM
  #201  
mhoward1
350Z-holic
 
mhoward1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 14,502
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikeg8r
Just curious, in general, what advantages/disadvantages do you typically get with a higher revving engine. For example, does a higher revving engine necessarily mean higher output or torque? Wouldn't larger displacement do the same thing?

This will all depend on the TQ curve of the engine
mhoward1 is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 03:39 PM
  #202  
Nismo 350z
New Member
 
Nismo 350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So.Cali 626-951
Posts: 2,239
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NewJerZ
Hopefully, Nissan won't go str8 Puzzy like Toyota did and nix ALL of their sportscars and sports coupes..AND start making ghey *** vehicles like Scion's
Agreed. However Toyota does have the new LF-A supercar and the new Supra coming out which will have 2 engines, one at 350hp and one at 450. Not trying to start a falme war cuz toyota does have ghey @$$ cars right now but they are #1 in the Japanese market.
Nismo 350z is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 05:15 PM
  #203  
DMS
Registered User
 
DMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: louisiana
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anyone heard anything yet on colors for 07. I really wanted a ZR white with blue top and frost interior. Hurricane Katrina took away my chances of getting an 05-06 so i have to wait til 07. Nervous about them possibly not bringing back this color combo. Any word?
DMS is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 09:52 PM
  #204  
yiaquemini
Registered User
 
yiaquemini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

according to nissannews.com the new 80% redesigned engine dosnt seem too impressive, 306hp under then new SAE NET rating is around what the IS350 makes, but not a big jump for all the changes they have made.
yiaquemini is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 10:43 PM
  #205  
06Gcoupin
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
06Gcoupin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yiaquemini
according to nissannews.com the new 80% redesigned engine dosnt seem too impressive, 306hp under then new SAE NET rating is around what the IS350 makes, but not a big jump for all the changes they have made.
That is for the 07 G35 sedan, that doesnt necessarily mean itll apply to the 07 Z.
06Gcoupin is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 06:47 AM
  #207  
mhoward1
350Z-holic
 
mhoward1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 14,502
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

I wonder what the rating for the old one would be under the new SAE system.

Time for a little research.
mhoward1 is offline  
Old 08-10-2006, 01:43 PM
  #208  
350zQ45a
Registered User
 
350zQ45a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mhoward1
I wonder what the rating for the old one would be under the new SAE system.

Time for a little research.

According to Infinti the 07 G coupe which still retains the revup engine, is down to 293 HP.

If the Z could land in 320 hp range that would be a nice bump, considering it's under the new SAE standards. Given the G with the new HR engine is at 306 hp, this doesn't seem like a stretch
350zQ45a is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 11:19 AM
  #209  
MAXecutive
Registered User
 
MAXecutive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I could understand that Nissan wants to offer a more affordable entry level sports car. But I don't see how this is the answer. I think that the Saturn Sky looks way better than this. Something seriously must be wrong with them to even think about producing the Urge. Here's some pics I took at the New York Int'l Auto Show.


MAXecutive is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 11:19 AM
  #210  
MAXecutive
Registered User
 
MAXecutive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol, I just noticed that its a 2+1, lol
MAXecutive is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 11:58 AM
  #211  
Mid117
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Mid117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYC/LI
Posts: 3,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so now that they turned the compression ratio up a little, it'll be harder to make it F/I??

How much better is the new engine compared to my 06?
I really dont see a big power gain, unless it was F/I.
Mid117 is offline  
Old 08-13-2006, 02:32 AM
  #212  
clarkkent06
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
clarkkent06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mid117
so now that they turned the compression ratio up a little, it'll be harder to make it F/I??

How much better is the new engine compared to my 06?
I really dont see a big power gain, unless it was F/I.
I'm sure with stronger internals (which this engine could have) and a less aggressive timing advance, FI could be just as easy in this motor. However, to go extreme FI you would have to replace internals to strengthen and also lower the CR anyways.

I don't think the answer to your second question will be known until the actual engine specs are released. A lot of hp can be gained other ways than by FI, however FI is the easiest.

Last edited by clarkkent06; 08-13-2006 at 02:35 AM.
clarkkent06 is offline  
Old 08-13-2006, 07:57 AM
  #213  
DomZ
Registered User
 
DomZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, imagine the VQ in that castrol syntec (I think?) commercial that jumps out of the engine bay...it has dual TB's for effect...but thats what it could look like.
DomZ is offline  
Old 08-13-2006, 12:51 PM
  #214  
WalkerT
Professional
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
WalkerT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok think about this the new GTR motor has to come from some where? If you improve the 350z/G35 engine then R&D it for two years in service. You would know that the parts and service are out there for the GTR. The block and the daul intakes are mainly for the twin turbo set up in the GTR not to make the 350z/G35 faster.
Think Big picture
WalkerT is offline  
Old 08-13-2006, 04:30 PM
  #215  
clarkkent06
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
clarkkent06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by walkert
Ok think about this the new GTR motor has to come from some where? If you improve the 350z/G35 engine then R&D it for two years in service. You would know that the parts and service are out there for the GTR. The block and the daul intakes are mainly for the twin turbo set up in the GTR not to make the 350z/G35 faster.
Think Big picture
OK, but this will still help z owners because since the engines are being designed for the GTR TT setup (stronger internals, etc), then this should make the z better for similar TT setups.
clarkkent06 is offline  
Old 08-13-2006, 04:47 PM
  #216  
WalkerT
Professional
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
WalkerT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of course it will benifit from big brother needing a stronger engine. I am just saying that there is a reason for a better engine even if it has about the same HP and TQ. It would not make sense for Nissan to redesign a engine for 10-15 more HP. When they could just redesign a single part on the curent engine to produce the same. The need has been placed by the GTR not by the 350z/G35. We just get to beneifit form the GTR's need.
WalkerT is offline  
Old 08-14-2006, 04:13 AM
  #217  
DomZ
Registered User
 
DomZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So is 306 the number that was announced or did someone just throw that up in the air? I'd be looking for 330-340, (350 would be sweet, 100hp/L and just a 16% increase over the revup's power). I'm saving now
DomZ is offline  
Old 08-14-2006, 05:30 AM
  #218  
DomZ
Registered User
 
DomZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://thehollywoodextra.blogspot.co...-nissan-z.html

Meerly a PS I think, but what does everyone think?
DomZ is offline  
Old 08-14-2006, 05:48 AM
  #219  
Jun
350Z-holic
iTrader: (45)
 
Jun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami/Kendall, Florida
Posts: 5,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that would be just a face-lift, not a redesign though.
The headlight is too busy, 3 projectors is overkill, and makes it look like a bug, and for some reason it reminds me of the Hyundai Tiburon.
The rear fenders are unproportionate too.
Jun is offline  
Old 08-14-2006, 07:47 AM
  #220  
MAXecutive
Registered User
 
MAXecutive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

damn this new engine is gonna be really hot if it does come out. But i always thought since back in 2003 that the next Z will probably be a 380Z, that just sounds much hotter
MAXecutive is offline  


Quick Reply: 2007 350z speculations?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 PM.