Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

04 Track vs 07 Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #81  
joe645733's Avatar
joe645733
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by illjim69
why is there so much crying about this, honestly?

a 6spd with a good driver IS faster, period. the 07s are faster than the previous cars, period. *this is based on stock cars, so save the whole "my 04 with x amount of mods can beat stock 07s" crap*

also keep in mind that the auto in the 07s limits the new engine a bit since it only revs out to 6600rpms.

jim
ok thank u, thats all i was looking for.
i know that it limits more than a 6spd. but i thought with the new engine and more power it wouldnt matter, i thought it would still take me no matter what
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 11:08 AM
  #82  
joe645733's Avatar
joe645733
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by PM-Performance
I dunno about autos, but the numbers I get are
2003-2005 287@274tq
2007 306@268tq

07 is 19hp more and 6ft lbs less tq.

Everyone brings up tq and weight because they have nothing better to argue about.
I haven't looked at side by side dynos to see the power bands, but 6ft lbs of tq doesn't mean jack to me. The weight might be a diff story though. but I am sure its not as extensive as others make it to be.

This crap goes on once a day. Its old and stupid. They have nothing better to comment on, so lets make fun of the hood. lol
i think thats it.

2004 track vs 07 enthusiast AT

i think the weight has to do with it. isnt it true (what i heard) every 100lbs takes 10hp?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 11:09 AM
  #83  
marques1's Avatar
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: austin, texas
Default

yeah listen to liljim he has no clue what he is talking about.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 11:10 AM
  #84  
marques1's Avatar
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: austin, texas
Default

joe the auto's are a little lighter than the manuals but not by much.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 11:13 AM
  #85  
joe645733's Avatar
joe645733
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by Fletch69z
That would definitely make the most sense but unfortunately, for one reason or another, the track trim is actually the second heaviest trim by only 22 pounds behind the touring trim. Here's the weights per Edmunds.com:
Track: 3225
Touring: 3247
Performance: 3217
Enthusiast: 3197
Base: 3188
(Oh, by the way, these were all for 04's) And I also meant that I thought the 04 track model was the heaviest trim for that year. But it's slightly lighter than the Touring.
i dont get it though, why would the nissan manual lie?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 11:16 AM
  #86  
joe645733's Avatar
joe645733
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

AND what i dont get.

if the 04 track model was nearly the heaviest, why would all of those videos reviewing and racing with the car choose it?

all the touge battles are with the track model and what-not.

AND NO I AM NOT HATING ON OTHER Z'S OF COURSE. i just dont think ur right about it being the heaviest. heavier than the touring and all. u guys go to edmunds about ur facts. just call nissan
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #87  
marques1's Avatar
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: austin, texas
Default

joe they also use the same car for road course track times they do not just do drag racing times and also stopping distance and all of that and the brembos on the track gives it advantages and the suspension setup and light wheels. If they were using the car just for drag racing they might not pick the track model.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #88  
marques1's Avatar
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: austin, texas
Default

what you must understand joe is that you could of beat him for numerous of reasons. His car's engine might not be broken in yet that can make a big difference in speed. His auto has higher gearing than your 6 speed alot of different factors but its not just because his auto.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #89  
illjim69's Avatar
illjim69
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 17,203
Likes: 545
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by marques1
i was not even talking about the 07 z i know its faster liljim. I was stating the facts that people said that it was an auto and that is why he got beat so bad in reality that is not why. Just because its a auto first of all does not mean you can drive the car good just like a manual their is more than just slamming the gas pedal to the ground believe it or not. Please post your track times up for me so we can compare otherwise just shut the hell up. Im not the fastest driver in the world and dont pretend to be but im ok. So we will see how my auto compares to your manual lol. I AGREE KIW. lILJIM WHAT FACTS ARE YOU STATING I JUST POSTED THEM FOR YOU WHERE IS YOUR PROOF NO TRACK TIMES NO NOTHING JUST TALKING OUT OF YOUR ***. iM NOT SURE IF YOU EVEN KNOW IF YOUR CAR TAKES OIL OR NOT AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
OMG! cars take oil?!!?!?!?!??! where does it go? in the cd player?

you toolbox, can you even read?

i already told you why an 07 auto will not fare so well. the HR engine has an advantage over the DE almost solely based on the fact that you can take it up to 7500rpms before you shift again. but only in the 6spd. in the auto, the 07 shifts at 6600rpms. so again, you are losing out on 900rpms worth of acceleration, right where this new engine makes it money, up top! how can that not make any sense to you. the auto on the 07 takes away a lot of power that the engine puts out.

if you have even driven an 07, you would understand that the car keeps pulling hard all the way to redline. i think if the rev limiter was bumped to 8000rpms it would still keep pulling.

now calm down, get in your car, put it in D and take a spin!

jim
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 12:04 PM
  #90  
illjim69's Avatar
illjim69
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 17,203
Likes: 545
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by kacz07
the 07 hood is gross...thats why i bought an 06 touring...saved me some cash and can upgrade with an mrev2 and MD +5/16th and prob be as fast as an 07...i'm hating on the 07 solely because it doesn't look good
hAt3Rz!

you don't like the hood, some people do. and the world keeps spinning............

jim
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 12:18 PM
  #91  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

Well either way its a Z and you can have fun with it either way. but my idea of a sports car in my hobbie which is road racing, ..a auto just doesnt cut it. But that doesnt mean u cant enjoy it and life goes on either way.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 12:25 PM
  #92  
ssnake86's Avatar
ssnake86
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

You cant go by those numbers, SAE came up with new standards when messuring HP for the 07s. Theres about a 25hp difference to the wheels on the 07 when dynoed compared to the previous years, and the torque on average is more to.

the average dyno numbers I see on an 07 from a dynojet are:

265hp
230tq


On a pre 07 I would say the most common is

240hp
222tq

If you want to go by this the 07 has 25 more hp and 8 more tq, to the wheels. Now this is by no means 100% accurate, as theres a lot of varibles involved, and I didnt take a proven average of the hp and tq for both cars. The right way to do it would be to take at least 25 samples of each car(pre 07 and 07) and find there averages on a dynojet.

The point I'm trying to make though, is that there is a bigger HP difference between pre 07 Z's an an 07 Z to the wheels, then you get by finding the difference of the numbers nissan put out. Also the torque on the 07 Z is at least the same or more then previous years.

Originally Posted by PM-Performance
I dunno about autos, but the numbers I get are
2003-2005 287@274tq
2007 306@268tq

07 is 19hp more and 6ft lbs less tq.

Everyone brings up tq and weight because they have nothing better to argue about.
I haven't looked at side by side dynos to see the power bands, but 6ft lbs of tq doesn't mean jack to me. The weight might be a diff story though. but I am sure its not as extensive as others make it to be.

This crap goes on once a day. Its old and stupid. They have nothing better to comment on, so lets make fun of the hood. lol

Last edited by ssnake86; Sep 20, 2007 at 12:29 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #93  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

Originally Posted by ssnake86
You cant go by those numbers, SAE came up with new standards when messuring HP for the 07s. Theres about a 25hp difference to the wheels on the 07 when dynoed compared to the previous years, and the torque on average is more to.

the average dyno numbers I see on an 07 from a dynojet are:

265hp
230tq


On a pre 07 I would say the most common is

240hp
222tq

If you want to go byt his the 07 has 25 more hp and 8 more tq, to the wheels. Now this is by no means 100% accurate, as theres a lot of varibles involved, and I didnt take a proven average of the hp and tq for both cars. The right way to do it would be to take at least 25 samples of each car(pre 07 and 07) and find there averages on a dynojet.

whats more important then that is at what rpm is it putting down its power. The HR i believe puts down 80 percent its power at a lower rpm then both VQ35DE and VQ35DERs . When i had my old revup oil eating engine . Racing a HR which put 2-3 cars on me. Consistantly will pull on you because it makes its power sooner then u forget the hp differences, you can have 2 engines have the same output but ones tuned to output it sooner at a lower rpm then the next.

Just like the revup and the reg de

if you look at them all the revups 30% change did was make it more of a topend engine. Most of its power is higher the the reg DE. I knwo this because everytime i race a DE even when i had a reg DE at pocono. REvups would consitantly pull on me on the straights. But in the corners it was a great slug match. With them always coming uptop on the straights and the ability to keep themesleves in there power band more because of the increased rev limit.

Now with the HR it has best of both worlds. The lower TQ of the DE and the Top and of the revup with a revised plenum and duel intake system which gives it a great mix of both worlds. A HR would dominate both engines ona track in there stock form. Modded well anything goes when modded.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 02:21 PM
  #94  
bhk1004's Avatar
bhk1004
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

the reason the auto lost is probably car he didnt race you in manumatic mode... the car shifts around 300 rpm's earlier and at the beginning of the race hes probably sitting in like 3rd gear then the automatic will need downshift and you lose time there. try it again in manual mode and him redlining each gear. guarantee you different results.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 02:43 PM
  #95  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

Originally Posted by bhk1004
the reason the auto lost is probably car he didnt race you in manumatic mode... the car shifts around 300 rpm's earlier and at the beginning of the race hes probably sitting in like 3rd gear then the automatic will need downshift and you lose time there. try it again in manual mode and him redlining each gear. guarantee you different results.
Dude he was racing in tiptronic. The car would be a dog without it. I dont think anyone in ther right mind would not be using the manumagic mode on a course. If ya got it use it.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #96  
bhk1004's Avatar
bhk1004
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

does he mention that somewhere? I didnt feel like reading through this entire thread.... i mean my auto went 13.7 with just intake and exhaust and its an 04... thats why i dont see why he should EASILY beat an 07. the only logical explanation is that he wasnt in manual mode.

Last edited by bhk1004; Sep 20, 2007 at 03:06 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #97  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

Originally Posted by bhk1004
does he mention that somewhere? I didnt feel like reading through this entire thread.... i mean my auto went 13.7 with just intake and exhaust and its an 04... thats why i dont see why he should EASILY beat an 07. the only logical explanation is that he wasnt in manual mode.
dude, you realize a 07 does 13.3 right stock in a 6mt. And times are getting better. im out of this thread some people are just insane.IF you think a previous Z in a auto thats nearly stock is going to beat a new 07 HR Z man..wow....take the other pill man you guys are stuck in the matrix.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #98  
marques1's Avatar
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: austin, texas
Default

Rblover He Is Trying To Say That The Pre 07 Are Faster He Is Saying He Ran A 13.7 In His Auto So Why Would The 07 Loss To The 6 Speed.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 03:53 PM
  #99  
bhk1004's Avatar
bhk1004
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by RBlover69
dude, you realize a 07 does 13.3 right stock in a 6mt. And times are getting better. im out of this thread some people are just insane.IF you think a previous Z in a auto thats nearly stock is going to beat a new 07 HR Z man..wow....take the other pill man you guys are stuck in the matrix.
what in gods name are you talking about? im stating that a 07 auto at worse should be a dead lock with a 04 track... saying that if my 04 went 13.7 the 07 should go faster... why are you completely flipping around what i said?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2007 | 03:55 PM
  #100  
marques1's Avatar
marques1
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 6
From: austin, texas
Default

I Tried To Correct Him Bhk1004 Some People Lack Reading Comprehension SkillS Lol Jk. IM PRETTY SURE ALOT OF THE MEMBERS IN THEIR 6 SPEEDS HAVE NOT RUN 13.7 THEY JUST LIKE TALKING A WHOLE BUNCH.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:45 PM.