Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Curious: what was your previous car and how does it compare to the Z?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2004, 06:49 PM
  #201  
Deceit
Registered User
 
Deceit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ocean NJ
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2003 Mitsu Evolution VIII, heavily modded to 420awhp: http://www.cardomain.com/id/deceit . Sold it because maintence on it was going to be ridiculous, insurance was killing me, and I needed a new project. Got my Z as a daily and i'll be getting a Supra for racing/modding next year
Old 11-20-2004, 10:48 AM
  #202  
sushi1111
Registered User
 
sushi1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

still have the mr2 if anyone is interested in buying
Old 11-20-2004, 11:43 PM
  #203  
350zbiturbo
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
350zbiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: miami,fl
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2003 subaru wrx 345 awhp, needed a little sports car in my life and wanted to get out of my high school boy ricer life lol
Old 11-20-2004, 11:52 PM
  #204  
lebby-pooh
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
lebby-pooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: atlanta / chattanooga
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

95 bmw m3 in my sig.

still have it, still drive it, and still mod it here and there.

can't let it go. alotta memories with that car.

like it better than the Z for now but we'll see when i start doing mods to the Z.
Old 11-21-2004, 01:02 AM
  #205  
Rickdogg
Out of hiatus
iTrader: (234)
 
Rickdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: My350z
Posts: 10,759
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Gave this one to my dad.



Still have this one



Old 11-21-2004, 06:57 AM
  #206  
LoneStar
Registered User
 
LoneStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texaz
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Poncho

My 2004 WS6, 13.9@101 in the quarter, a WRX/350Z eater on the street. Paddle shifters on the steering wheel, and Eaton M90 under the hood with 12.5 psi. These FWD cars are a b*tch to launch though......

Old 11-22-2004, 05:11 PM
  #207  
sushi1111
Registered User
 
sushi1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Rickdogg,

Nice mr2. got any more pics online?
Old 11-23-2004, 10:57 AM
  #208  
mxpx_8
Registered User
 
mxpx_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: .
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2002 RSX type-S. I wish I would have kept it and never got this POS Z. Who needs a car with a defect that forces you to buy new tires every 5,000 miles.

None-the-less I am suing nissan and soon they will be buying their crap back.
Old 11-23-2004, 11:42 AM
  #209  
itburns
Registered User
 
itburns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1995 Bronco/Eddie Bauer Edition, 5.8L V8, white/bronze. '96 was the last year for the Bronco. Nice ride for what it was, lots of cargo space. Reliable engine and tranny. But the brakes were shot and replaced twice and there were lots of very annoying electrical problems with the alarm, power windows, engine kill switch and even the tail lights.

But if I had some place to park it, I would have kept it.
Old 11-23-2004, 11:50 AM
  #210  
boma
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
boma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know what u mean about Acura quality vs. Nissan.


I bet your RSX Type S was airtight and rattle free compared to the 350Z.

My Z seems like a rattly box compared to my 99 Civic. Even my VW was this bad.
Old 11-23-2004, 12:19 PM
  #211  
350zluvr
Registered User
 
350zluvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by mxpx_8
2002 RSX type-S. I wish I would have kept it and never got this POS Z. Who needs a car with a defect that forces you to buy new tires every 5,000 miles.

None-the-less I am suing nissan and soon they will be buying their crap back.
You seem very very mad .

Why are you surfing enthusiast boards of a car you hate so much?
Old 11-23-2004, 12:59 PM
  #212  
Dissident
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Dissident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My 240sx was bulletproof and didn't chew threw tires, either, but it only made 140hp. And, it cost $20,000 back in 1990. Z costs $30,000, makes twice the power, and looks way better. I'm not complaining.

Hell, my bike eats up tires every 3000 miles. I COULD put hard tires on there that last forever, but if I wanted that, I woulda bought a harley....
Old 11-23-2004, 03:49 PM
  #213  
DaytonaBlue04
Registered User
 
DaytonaBlue04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a 2000 Ford Lightning, lightly modded. Gobs of torque down low, would send the tires up in smoke at any speed below 15mph. It ran 12.8s on 14psi of boost and I could tow a boat and haul dirt with it. I got rid of it because I simply wanted something different, after having had it for 4 1/2 years. I even had a 1999 Lightning before that. I wanted to give japanese car ownership a try, and so far I am quite pleased.
Old 11-23-2004, 07:04 PM
  #214  
Rickdogg
Out of hiatus
iTrader: (234)
 
Rickdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: My350z
Posts: 10,759
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally posted by sushi1111
Rickdogg,

Nice mr2. got any more pics online?
I did have a whole write up on speedoptions with more pics before they revamped everything and wiped out everything I do have a few more pics with a cracked front lip
Old 11-23-2004, 08:22 PM
  #215  
boma
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
boma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL, funny thing I kinda want a lightning!

So Quick....
Old 11-25-2004, 10:40 AM
  #216  
titankiller
Registered User
 
titankiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2000 Ford Lightning
630 rwhp
18 psi
mid 11 sec monster without traction!!!!

I can't compare the Z to this but I'm happy!
Old 11-25-2004, 11:22 AM
  #217  
NzZ
New Member
 
NzZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: LV
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by mxpx_8
2002 RSX type-S. I wish I would have kept it and never got this POS Z. Who needs a car with a defect that forces you to buy new tires every 5,000 miles.
Ironic considering that NSXs had this exact problem, and they are widely revered as the ultimate Honda car. Still, I understand how frustrating feathering can be. As for rattles, guys it's a firm riding car. I've yet to ride in an M3, 911, or S2k that didn't have a dozen rattles as well. If you wanted a drop dead quiet ride, Lexus has a whole lineup for ya!

NzZ
Old 11-26-2004, 07:37 AM
  #218  
tk952
Registered User
 
tk952's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had an 1989 944 Turbo that was superior to this car it's not funny.

Better braking, handling, acceleration, quality, more practical, better interior space.

It was old though, and needed little bits of attention now and then. My wife thought it was way too fast for the street. It was fairly modded and was insanely quick and fast. It was going to either tempt me into losing my license or my life.

I like the look and sound of the Z. I think the interior is incredibly cheap and poorly layed out, the paint is ***, and the tire issue is bad engineering. (I guess we have proof that it is partly Renault).

I have other cars in the meantime, but this was my sports car replacement. In my opinion, a mistake.

Sorry.
Old 12-09-2004, 07:10 AM
  #219  
gav350z
Registered User
 
gav350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Billingham (UK)
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by tk952
I had an 1989 944 Turbo that was superior to this car it's not funny.

Better braking, handling, acceleration, quality, more practical, better interior space.

It was old though, and needed little bits of attention now and then. My wife thought it was way too fast for the street. It was fairly modded and was insanely quick and fast. It was going to either tempt me into losing my license or my life.

I like the look and sound of the Z. I think the interior is incredibly cheap and poorly layed out, the paint is ***, and the tire issue is bad engineering. (I guess we have proof that it is partly Renault).

I have other cars in the meantime, but this was my sports car replacement. In my opinion, a mistake.

Sorry.

New 350z Le Mans with GT pack and Nismo kit.
Still got my Black 91' 944 Turbo.

Prefer the 'newness' of the 350, its a great car but will miss the Porsche when its sold. I have had it for 6 years but I found that you could drive at the limit with a lot more confidence in the 944 from first drive, seemed to be a bit more connected if that makes any sense. Or it could be that i'm not quite ready to fling a new £30k + car around just yet, live in the UK so got to wait for some nice dry weather before I give the 350z a good booting around. The 350z definately looks the part compared to the 944 which looks its age now, but I miss that turbo push when flooring it. Possibly looking at a Turbo/charger for the Z next year.

Overall the Z is a better car, just lacking in soul compared to the Porsche, can see where tk952 is coming from but have to go with the Z.
Old 12-09-2004, 07:27 AM
  #220  
Neo105
Registered User
 
Neo105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Amsterdam, Holland
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mercedes E 320 '03, Very nice car with a great interior (Benzes come cheap here :-p) Leather interior, BOSE system, 4 seats... 4 very happy people, but then it hit me...

i didn't have enough friends to fill the seats hehe,

but i'll keep it next to the Z... The problem with the 320 is, that it does not have enough horsepower for a 3.2 litre, it has some torque though, but it's nothing compared to the handling and engine caristeristics of the Z, so it took me 10 seconds to decide that the Z was a great car in which i'll probably have miles and miles of fun :-)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:23 PM.