Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Dai Yoshihara's 350Z roadster Time Attack Car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2009 | 06:35 PM
  #1  
morepower2's Avatar
morepower2
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: california
Default Dai Yoshihara's 350Z roadster Time Attack Car

I thought you guys might be interested in one of our new projects

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...tack-350Z.aspx

Making a roadster competitive is sorta tough but we are going to give it a crack!
Old 11-20-2009 | 07:08 PM
  #2  
chrisjersey06's Avatar
chrisjersey06
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Good read. Wonder why they chose a "true" coilover in the rear though, doesn't SPL's site mention how the seperate spring and shock setup is superior?
Old 11-20-2009 | 08:44 PM
  #3  
morepower2's Avatar
morepower2
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: california
Default

In the article we explain why it was done to reduce unsprung weight and overall weight by taking the load off the toe link. This allows a much lighter toe link, an a lighter spring assembly.

The advantages of having the spring separate from the shock are that there is no friction creating side load due to spring kink on the shock shaft which can make the suspension more supple.

With high quality dampers like KW, the issue of sticksion due to side load is greatly reduced due to the large internal bearing aera and the high quality bearings used by KW.
Old 11-21-2009 | 07:05 AM
  #4  
Fletch69z's Avatar
Fletch69z
Registered User
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Looks awesome!
Old 11-21-2009 | 07:11 AM
  #5  
BornSlippyZ's Avatar
BornSlippyZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 2
From: Minnesota!
Default

Sweet another Z for RTA next year!
Old 11-22-2009 | 01:37 PM
  #6  
D_K's Avatar
D_K
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 132
Likes: 2
From: UNKNOWN
Default

Do they allow turbo kits on NA cars in the street class? The Z's need them in that class. Most cars that make it to the podium in that class are FI .
The following users liked this post:
CK_32 (01-18-2017)
Old 11-22-2009 | 02:52 PM
  #7  
chrisjersey06's Avatar
chrisjersey06
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by morepower2
In the article we explain why it was done to reduce unsprung weight and overall weight by taking the load off the toe link. This allows a much lighter toe link, an a lighter spring assembly.

The advantages of having the spring separate from the shock are that there is no friction creating side load due to spring kink on the shock shaft which can make the suspension more supple.

With high quality dampers like KW, the issue of sticksion due to side load is greatly reduced due to the large internal bearing aera and the high quality bearings used by KW.
Ah, so I'm confused then...I guess both kinds have their pros and cons? Always wondered why certain coilovers give you the choice of either setup.

I'm not a suspension guru, just referring to the link on SPL's site where they say, "Therefore, for better handling, it is desirable to have the spring in the stock location."

http://splparts.com/main4/parts/Z33/...oiloverFAQ.htm

Last edited by chrisjersey06; 11-22-2009 at 02:53 PM.
Old 11-22-2009 | 04:38 PM
  #8  
morepower2's Avatar
morepower2
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: california
Default

Originally Posted by D_K
Do they allow turbo kits on NA cars in the street class? The Z's need them in that class. Most cars that make it to the podium in that class are FI .
In street class anything goes, except the cars have to run on tires with a UTOG of 140 or higher, they have to have a full interior, full exhaust, no lexan and the heater has to be in place. You can add a turbo or supercharger. Its a pretty cool class and its dominated by S2000's for the RWD class.
Old 11-22-2009 | 04:41 PM
  #9  
morepower2's Avatar
morepower2
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: california
Default

Originally Posted by chrisjersey06
Ah, so I'm confused then...I guess both kinds have their pros and cons? Always wondered why certain coilovers give you the choice of either setup.

I'm not a suspension guru, just referring to the link on SPL's site where they say, "Therefore, for better handling, it is desirable to have the spring in the stock location."

http://splparts.com/main4/parts/Z33/...oiloverFAQ.htm
Both have there pros and cons. If you wanted to have the rear springs in the stock location and wanted to hace adjustable ride height and corner balance the rear you have to run SPL's awsome rear arm and a big NASCAR style 4.5" race spring.

The SPL rear arm is the best but its a big billet CNCed part and if you run 4.5" springs, you sizes and rates are limited. There are a lot of posibilites with a 2.5" rear spring, its the most common.

Going to a coil over conversion probably saves 20 lbs or more and all of it is unsprung.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
davidm350
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
37
10-31-2015 02:28 PM
SanmarinoZ
Brakes & Suspension
4
10-21-2015 10:04 AM
MicVelo
NorCal Marketplace
9
10-04-2015 07:55 PM
416blueZ
New Owners
10
09-25-2015 10:00 AM



Quick Reply: Dai Yoshihara's 350Z roadster Time Attack Car



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:05 PM.