Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Now that the V6 Mustang spanks the Z...

Old 04-09-2010, 05:44 PM
  #21  
NyCSnEaK
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
NyCSnEaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NY -----> NJ
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ibtl...
NyCSnEaK is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 05:45 PM
  #22  
mikeyj217
Registered User
 
mikeyj217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SirSpeedyZ
newer cars equal better performance than older cars, what else is new?
Yeah how are you comparing an old car to a brand new car. These cars are also not even in the same price range. You should be comparing a 2011 mustang gt to a 2011 370z.
mikeyj217 is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 06:08 PM
  #23  
JEKL
New Member
iTrader: (24)
 
JEKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Now that the V6 Z Spanks the V8 Mustang

I'll let the stats speak for themselves:

2003 Ford Mustang
4.6L V8
260HP
5.5 second 0-60


2010 Nissan 370Z
3.7L V6
332HP
4.7 second 0-60

Last edited by JEKL; 04-09-2010 at 06:55 PM. Reason: Happy?
JEKL is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 06:27 PM
  #24  
Maxima SE
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Maxima SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and why are we comparing a 2003 car to a 2011 car?
Maxima SE is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 06:36 PM
  #25  
DB350
Registered User
 
DB350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The cold
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JEKL
I'll let the stats speak for themselves:

2003 Ford Mustang
4.6L V8
260HP
5.5 second 0-60


2010 Nissan 350Z
3.7L V6
332HP
4.7 second 0-60
There was a 2010 350z?!!?

/sarcasm
DB350 is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 06:44 PM
  #26  
03threefiftyz
350Z-holic
iTrader: (25)
 
03threefiftyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 9,848
Received 117 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

03threefiftyz is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 06:53 PM
  #27  
Barnabas
National Z Club President
iTrader: (15)
 
Barnabas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: the coolest place on earth
Posts: 9,952
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If you comparing a brand new mustang why not compare a brand new Z which is the *370*
Barnabas is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 06:55 PM
  #28  
JEKL
New Member
iTrader: (24)
 
JEKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DB350
There was a 2010 350z?!!?

/sarcasm
It's a limited edition.
JEKL is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 07:04 PM
  #29  
nismonian
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
nismonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JEKL
I'll let the stats speak for themselves:

2003 Ford Mustang
4.6L V8
260HP
5.5 second 0-60


2010 Nissan 370Z
3.7L V6
332HP
4.7 second 0-60
op you got
nismonian is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 07:26 PM
  #30  
AzuLzed06
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
AzuLzed06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BornSlippyZ
This competition is good though, Nissan will probably bring back the tt since Ford is. Plus the price will go up like the 90's Z and most kids will not be able to afford it.
i doubt it, it will interfere gt-r sale price wise. That or TT-Z will not sell most will just consider getting the Gt-r.
Plus Nissan could careless what ford brings. Now if other Jap. manufacturers does thats a different story.

Last edited by AzuLzed06; 04-09-2010 at 07:31 PM.
AzuLzed06 is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 07:32 PM
  #31  
HyperKnight
Stulax makes me cream
iTrader: (1)
 
HyperKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 16,401
Received 631 Likes on 440 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavesZ#3
This is a Z website. What do we care about a Rustang/Cumstang?
That 5.0 Cumstang is looking good right about now.
HyperKnight is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 08:30 PM
  #32  
larue582
Registered User
 
larue582's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wrightstown, New Jersey
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Mudstain has so many manufacturers of different models. If your gonna compare, compare same years...
larue582 is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 08:38 PM
  #33  
widebody350
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
widebody350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OP, keeping it in the Mustang family, that also means that the 05 Mustang GT folks are going to be a little upset when they laugh at the new V6 that pulls up next to them then get beaten by the girly V6. Also we can even compare old to new and look pretty good when the 03 350Z beats the 05 Mustang GT IIRC.
widebody350 is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 08:59 PM
  #34  
350Zdj
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
350Zdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,914
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

@OP. thoses stats shown there are not much of a difference.
It's not like you will come across and race a '10 stang everytime u go out and drive.

When you go out to the circuit/autoX these stats become meaningless when the Z driver knows what he's doing.
350Zdj is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:09 PM
  #35  
Swimminggerman
Registered User
 
Swimminggerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ohio, Cleveland
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LOL it sounds like our Z's a bit, minus the atempted muscular burble from the exhaust. but seriously it sounds a bit like a z. Oh and i think they are ugly. Ill give credit to the motor a bit and ford. Supposedtly a .96g skidpad, nice. but yuck.
Swimminggerman is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:11 PM
  #36  
Corbic
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Corbic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SB
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JEKL
I'll let the stats speak for themselves:

2003 Ford Mustang
4.6L V8
260HP
5.5 second 0-60
Yeah, except the 2003 Mustang came out in 1999, cost $5,000 less then a 2003 350Z and only takes about $3,000 to run 12's

The 350z takes a $9,000 turbo kit.
Corbic is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:15 PM
  #37  
GalvatronType_R
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
GalvatronType_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Van down by the river
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here we go again, a paper numbers reader going on and on about how much better one car is above the other.

OP, I suggest you take your Kentucky waterfall mullet and sleeveless plaid button down shirt to the nearest Ford stealership and buy a V6 LX Mustang pronto, stat, ad infinitum, etc.
GalvatronType_R is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:15 PM
  #38  
Corbic
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Corbic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SB
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by widebody350
OP, keeping it in the Mustang family, that also means that the 05 Mustang GT folks are going to be a little upset when they laugh at the new V6 that pulls up next to them then get beaten by the girly V6. Also we can even compare old to new and look pretty good when the 03 350Z beats the 05 Mustang GT IIRC.
I'm well aware. However Mustangs are simply retarded cheap to go fast, the Z responds poorly to N/A mods, has a cramped engine bay that is not -diy turbo- friendly and a god damn ring&pinion set costs over $500 (compared to a $90 Mustang set).

05 Mustang received the 3v, I believe that car is faster then a the DE engines, only a HR would give him a run for his money, stock-for-stock.
Corbic is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:16 PM
  #39  
Corbic
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Corbic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SB
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GalvatronType_R
Here we go again, a paper numbers reader going on and on about how much better one car is above the other.

OP, I suggest you take your Kentucky waterfall mullet and sleeveless plaid button down shirt to the nearest Ford stealership and buy a V6 LX Mustang pronto, stat, ad infinitum, etc.
Racist.
Corbic is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 09:20 PM
  #40  
Corbic
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Corbic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SB
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Maxima SE
and why are we comparing a 2003 car to a 2011 car?
Because in one Generation Nissan's Top Sports car is no longer very relevant as a cost effective tuner car. The lowly, POS Mustang V6 is able to trump it in every performance test and still maintain a large, inexpensive aftermarket.

Essentially, in my 3 years of Z-ownership, the only way to make any damn power at all on the car and improve it's performance is with a +8k FI set-up, something few other cars really have to suffer in this day and age. They either come pre-turbo'ed, like the WRX, Evo, MS3, GTi and STi.... or are Domestic V8s with an endless aftermarket of quality, inexpensive parts and plenty of go fast tricks.
Corbic is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Now that the V6 Mustang spanks the Z...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 PM.