Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Y Buy A 350 When I Can Buy A Sti!!!??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2004 | 07:27 PM
  #41  
droideka's Avatar
droideka
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 1
From: frisco, tx
Default

Originally posted by rouxeny
Try taking a cool picture of an STI and you'll see why I bought my Z.
I'll bet I can shoot several.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 04:44 AM
  #42  
Asterix's Avatar
Asterix
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
Default

My reason for not getting the STI is I refuse to pay over $20,000 for a car with McPherson struts. It's as easy as that. The suspension on the 350Z is superior. You can throw tons of money at both and the 350Z will handle better. Guaranteed. Those upper control arms make all the difference.

Both have more than enough power for the street.

Asterix
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 04:49 AM
  #43  
supraturbo#2's Avatar
supraturbo#2
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: milwaukee
Default

You must drive on some pretty sorry *** streets
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 05:05 AM
  #44  
ranger5oh's Avatar
ranger5oh
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
From: Blue Steel
Default

I am sorry, but for all these people that thin the Z helps get you girls.. it doesnt. What a lame argument. What girl in their right mind would go out with a guy cause he had a sporty $30k car? Im sorry, but that argument is BUNK.

Get a 350 for styling. Thats really all it has over the STi.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 09:19 AM
  #45  
Jetpilot718's Avatar
Jetpilot718
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NYC
Default

Originally posted by ranger5oh
I am sorry, but for all these people that thin the Z helps get you girls.. it doesnt. What a lame argument. What girl in their right mind would go out with a guy cause he had a sporty $30k car? Im sorry, but that argument is BUNK.

Get a 350 for styling. Thats really all it has over the STi.



Go visit NYC sometime... check out francis lewis blvd, queens nyc. Last time I was on that, a jeep with 3 girls picked ME up.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 12:03 PM
  #46  
dnguyent's Avatar
dnguyent
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Default

In all practical sense, the STI and Evo 8 was what I really needed: great power, AWD (I ski), 4 doors, Brembo brakes, great handling, great pricing, and I do love watching WRC! But, I'm approaching my mid 30's I couldn't make the small-econobox-with-large-wing-look work for me. And, most of my family and friends would've wondered why I bought another sub-compact after I drove a Nissan Sentra for 10 years.

Even as I was mulling over the Sti and Evo, I also lusted after the Z for a year. I was ready to accept the fact that a stock Z may fall marginally behind the STi and Evo in overall peak performance, but it was still a fairly easy decision to make. I gave up 2 seats, 2 doors, some handling nimbleness, and AWD just because the Z had such fluid design (I like fine art too). I sometimes hang out in the garage just to stare at it, as I'm sure many Z owner do.

I don't have any regrets choosing the Z over the other two rockets. But, if you choose the Sti or Evo, I know you won't be disappointed.

Lastly, I never found it easy to pick up girls with any particular car. Lots of people have nice cars, but not very many have nice bikes. I found it much easier to pick up girls on my Ducati...they're fast, beautiful, and their exhaust note will make you melt. Since I used my bike to bait my now-fiancee, I'm probably going to put it up for sale to a desperate single male who's had no luck with the Z, LOL!!!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 02:40 PM
  #47  
The Brickyard Rat's Avatar
The Brickyard Rat
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, Ca.
Default

If you have to ask, buy the STi.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 02:53 PM
  #48  
jimster716's Avatar
jimster716
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default

Originally posted by Asterix
My reason for not getting the STI is I refuse to pay over $20,000 for a car with McPherson struts. It's as easy as that. The suspension on the 350Z is superior. You can throw tons of money at both and the 350Z will handle better. Guaranteed. Those upper control arms make all the difference.

Both have more than enough power for the street.

Asterix
Porsche uses McPherson struts.

http://www2.us.porsche.com/english/u...ns/default.htm
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #49  
EL Diablo's Avatar
EL Diablo
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,641
Likes: 0
From: The Under World
Default

Originally posted by Jetpilot718
Go visit NYC sometime... check out francis lewis blvd, queens nyc. Last time I was on that, a jeep with 3 girls picked ME up.


Yup. those Franny Lou girls are shallow.

Just how I like'em
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 05:07 PM
  #50  
Sr. Panza's Avatar
Sr. Panza
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,676
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

An ST-What?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 05:32 PM
  #51  
1337's Avatar
1337
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
From: Mid West
Default

why bash STI - it's nice little car..

Here is to what I would do in your place.

Test drive one
Test drive the other

think of the long term - (it is a new car you are buying after all)
how will you feel in 5 years.

+Nissan has less problems longterm than STi - turbos will break a lot more than non turbo car (where 14 psi is a whole bunch of wear and tear)..
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 08:24 PM
  #52  
christurismohk's Avatar
christurismohk
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: LA County
Default

i got rid of a heavily modded supra as well!!!! http://www.cardomain.com/id/supratt95

was fun but didnt have custom insurance, and it had 65k miles so i got a new 2004 350z...
nice supra!! too bad it was an auto
honestly..even though I have a Z, another car that i respect is the Supra...because it was* a nice car
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #53  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

Originally posted by supraturbo#2
Well, the fact that the STI has tested with fast mph numbers in the 1/4, is usually an indicator that it will be faster from a roll. I'm sure they are very close though. I hope they are close, hell, I'm trading in my STI for one!
quarter mile takes 2 things into account. one is power, sheer power. the other is launch. simplified of course, but the launch is where the STI slaughters the Z. AWD, twice the traction, launch at a higher RPM, and no chance of spinning 2nd either.

check out any tests from a roll, and youll see a very different picture.

the STI may feel faster due to the turbo increasing HP, or possibly more squat in the rear under acceration. I havent really checked out the STI dyno curve to see if it slopes up sharply, or rode in one to see if itd squat under power. but both or combo of each may have given you the idea that it was faster at all speeds.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 08:35 PM
  #54  
ml2316's Avatar
ml2316
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

i think it comes down to your priorities. if you're mostly obssessed with performance, then get the sti. if styling is important to you, then get the z, which still has a LOT of performance. i could imagine going with either car and being happy. straightline performance is pretty awesome. being able to toast pretty much ANY car you're likely to encounter(depending on where you live) is pretty awesome too. it would be a hard choice for me as well. if i wasn't single though, i think it would be a no-brainer: sti.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 08:44 PM
  #55  
ml2316's Avatar
ml2316
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

Originally posted by ares
quarter mile takes 2 things into account. one is power, sheer power. the other is launch. simplified of course, but the launch is where the STI slaughters the Z. AWD, twice the traction, launch at a higher RPM, and no chance of spinning 2nd either.

check out any tests from a roll, and youll see a very different picture.

the STI may feel faster due to the turbo increasing HP, or possibly more squat in the rear under acceration. I havent really checked out the STI dyno curve to see if it slopes up sharply, or rode in one to see if itd squat under power. but both or combo of each may have given you the idea that it was faster at all speeds.
sti has a higher et and trap speed so not just subjectively faster and not just a better launcher. i'd be interested to see the 60-100 times of each car though.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 09:02 PM
  #56  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

you mean lower ET.

but of course they are faster, as they are getting a better launch... though from what Ive seen, they are getting like 13.3 at 106.

where most rwd cars running a low 13 would be closer to 110mph.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XM 1
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jul 10, 2022 07:44 AM
Justin100
Exterior & Interior
11
Nov 25, 2021 06:26 AM
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
Jambo016
New Owners
27
Sep 16, 2016 01:08 PM
Alexreyes
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
13
Sep 30, 2015 11:30 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 PM.