Is it ok to mix front and rear tire brands?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it ok to mix front and rear tire brands?
My Z is in the shop right now getting 2 new front tires to fix the feathering problem. I am 11,000 miles now. My question is, being that my front tires are going to be 11,000 miles newer than my fronts, what do I do when it comes time to replace the rears. I want to get my money's worth out of the new front tires, but I also want to change to a new type or tire. I live in the North East, so I would like to get a set of all season tires to put on. What would happen if I just get new all season tires for the rear, and kept the stocks up front? I still have many miles until I actually have to worry about this, but I am curious what people have to say about it.
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RacerX68
That's perfectly fine. As long as you replace both fronts or both rears at the same time with the same tire, you are okay.
That's perfectly fine. As long as you replace both fronts or both rears at the same time with the same tire, you are okay.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Is it ok to mix front and rear tire brands?
Originally posted by sherman
I live in the North East, so I would like to get a set of all season tires to put on. What would happen if I just get new all season tires for the rear, and kept the stocks up front?
I live in the North East, so I would like to get a set of all season tires to put on. What would happen if I just get new all season tires for the rear, and kept the stocks up front?
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm going to disagree with RacerX68. It's fine to do this for the family minivan if your goal is just to save some money while having adequate tires to get to and from soccer practice, but this really isn't a great idea for a sports car. At least it isn't if you plan to use some of the nice handling capability built into your sports car. A setup with all-season tires in the rear and summer performance tires in the front would give you a lot of oversteer if you push the car close to its limits (on dry roads anyway). At best the car wouldn't be much fun, at worse you'll end up backwards in a tree.
On the other hand, if all you do is drive around suburbia under the speed limit and got the Z for its cruising potential only, knock your socks off. It'll still get you to the 7-11 and back as long as the tires are round and have air in them...
On the other hand, if all you do is drive around suburbia under the speed limit and got the Z for its cruising potential only, knock your socks off. It'll still get you to the 7-11 and back as long as the tires are round and have air in them...
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, so now I see there are differing point of views on this (no suprise there). I am only asking this question really for time between when I get my new rear tire, and when when my front tires need to be replaced (should be about 11,000) when I will get the front to match the rears. I just don't want to waste brand new tires that nissan is giving me, and I don't want to be stock on the stocks becuase of that. If you have any other suggestions for my dilema, let me know. And yes, you could say I am just being cheap and that I should just buy all 4, but I already know that.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by sherman
OK, so now I see there are differing point of views on this (no suprise there). I am only asking this question really for time between when I get my new rear tire, and when when my front tires need to be replaced (should be about 11,000) when I will get the front to match the rears. I just don't want to waste brand new tires that nissan is giving me, and I don't want to be stock on the stocks becuase of that. If you have any other suggestions for my dilema, let me know. And yes, you could say I am just being cheap and that I should just buy all 4, but I already know that.
OK, so now I see there are differing point of views on this (no suprise there). I am only asking this question really for time between when I get my new rear tire, and when when my front tires need to be replaced (should be about 11,000) when I will get the front to match the rears. I just don't want to waste brand new tires that nissan is giving me, and I don't want to be stock on the stocks becuase of that. If you have any other suggestions for my dilema, let me know. And yes, you could say I am just being cheap and that I should just buy all 4, but I already know that.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's your call, you should do as you wish instead of listening to strangers like me giving you advice over the internet (), but, here's how I see it.
I bought my Z because I wanted a car that performed well in acceleration, braking, cornering and handling. For those properties I was willing to pay a premium. If I did not care about these things I could have bought a $14,000 Civic which would be just as capable of getting me and a passenger wherever I needed to go. I was willing to spend an extra $14K to buy better braking, cornering and acceleration. So to me, removing some of that performance to save $300 is not a good value at all. I realize a Z with mistmatched performance/all season tires is still a better sports car than a Civic but you're definitely removing some of the performance that you paid many thousands of dollars for. So, I wouldn't do it because it doesn't make sense to me personally. But if you can live with it and think that it's the right decision for you, then by all means, go ahead. You asked for people's opinion and that's all you're getting from me.
Btw, a set of Kumho Ecsta MX tires can be had for $650 shipped, which really isn't that much compared to the initial investment IMO.
I bought my Z because I wanted a car that performed well in acceleration, braking, cornering and handling. For those properties I was willing to pay a premium. If I did not care about these things I could have bought a $14,000 Civic which would be just as capable of getting me and a passenger wherever I needed to go. I was willing to spend an extra $14K to buy better braking, cornering and acceleration. So to me, removing some of that performance to save $300 is not a good value at all. I realize a Z with mistmatched performance/all season tires is still a better sports car than a Civic but you're definitely removing some of the performance that you paid many thousands of dollars for. So, I wouldn't do it because it doesn't make sense to me personally. But if you can live with it and think that it's the right decision for you, then by all means, go ahead. You asked for people's opinion and that's all you're getting from me.
Btw, a set of Kumho Ecsta MX tires can be had for $650 shipped, which really isn't that much compared to the initial investment IMO.
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bryan, Texas
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jason Bourne
I'm going to disagree with RacerX68. It's fine to do this for the family minivan if your goal is just to save some money while having adequate tires to get to and from soccer practice, but this really isn't a great idea for a sports car. At least it isn't if you plan to use some of the nice handling capability built into your sports car. A setup with all-season tires in the rear and summer performance tires in the front would give you a lot of oversteer if you push the car close to its limits (on dry roads anyway). At best the car wouldn't be much fun, at worse you'll end up backwards in a tree.
On the other hand, if all you do is drive around suburbia under the speed limit and got the Z for its cruising potential only, knock your socks off. It'll still get you to the 7-11 and back as long as the tires are round and have air in them...
I'm going to disagree with RacerX68. It's fine to do this for the family minivan if your goal is just to save some money while having adequate tires to get to and from soccer practice, but this really isn't a great idea for a sports car. At least it isn't if you plan to use some of the nice handling capability built into your sports car. A setup with all-season tires in the rear and summer performance tires in the front would give you a lot of oversteer if you push the car close to its limits (on dry roads anyway). At best the car wouldn't be much fun, at worse you'll end up backwards in a tree.
On the other hand, if all you do is drive around suburbia under the speed limit and got the Z for its cruising potential only, knock your socks off. It'll still get you to the 7-11 and back as long as the tires are round and have air in them...
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jason Bourne
It's your call, you should do as you wish instead of listening to strangers like me giving you advice over the internet (), but, here's how I see it.
I bought my Z because I wanted a car that performed well in acceleration, braking, cornering and handling. For those properties I was willing to pay a premium. If I did not care about these things I could have bought a $14,000 Civic which would be just as capable of getting me and a passenger wherever I needed to go. I was willing to spend an extra $14K to buy better braking, cornering and acceleration. So to me, removing some of that performance to save $300 is not a good value at all. I realize a Z with mistmatched performance/all season tires is still a better sports car than a Civic but you're definitely removing some of the performance that you paid many thousands of dollars for. So, I wouldn't do it because it doesn't make sense to me personally. But if you can live with it and think that it's the right decision for you, then by all means, go ahead. You asked for people's opinion and that's all you're getting from me.
Btw, a set of Kumho Ecsta MX tires can be had for $650 shipped, which really isn't that much compared to the initial investment IMO.
It's your call, you should do as you wish instead of listening to strangers like me giving you advice over the internet (), but, here's how I see it.
I bought my Z because I wanted a car that performed well in acceleration, braking, cornering and handling. For those properties I was willing to pay a premium. If I did not care about these things I could have bought a $14,000 Civic which would be just as capable of getting me and a passenger wherever I needed to go. I was willing to spend an extra $14K to buy better braking, cornering and acceleration. So to me, removing some of that performance to save $300 is not a good value at all. I realize a Z with mistmatched performance/all season tires is still a better sports car than a Civic but you're definitely removing some of the performance that you paid many thousands of dollars for. So, I wouldn't do it because it doesn't make sense to me personally. But if you can live with it and think that it's the right decision for you, then by all means, go ahead. You asked for people's opinion and that's all you're getting from me.
Btw, a set of Kumho Ecsta MX tires can be had for $650 shipped, which really isn't that much compared to the initial investment IMO.
And I do apreciate all the different opinions, that is the reason I asked.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sherman,
You certainly won't be doing any damage as long as you get tires that are correctly sized. My point is, as you suspect, related to performance. But it's a little bit different than just going from 4 summer tires to 4 all season tires. In that case, you will lose grip and handling performance but the balance of the car will be the same (lose the same amount in front and in rear). If you just change one end of the car, you're going to affect the handling balance. In this case, by going to all season rear tires, your car will be more likely to oversteer in dry conditions. If you don't drive the car hard, this won't be a problem but it may feel a little strange from a seat of the pants perspective. But again you won't do any damage.
Now if you do try to drive it hard on the street (or take it to a racetrack) with mismatched rear tires, it could become a problem because you may not be ready to handle the oversteer you could get. Also, if you ever get into an emergency avoidance situation, it could become a problem. For example if you need to avoid a deer on the highway and do a last second, high speed lane change you could end up going backwards at 70mph when you could have kept it under control with matched tires.
But that's the only real "risk" if you don't care about the performance loss.
You certainly won't be doing any damage as long as you get tires that are correctly sized. My point is, as you suspect, related to performance. But it's a little bit different than just going from 4 summer tires to 4 all season tires. In that case, you will lose grip and handling performance but the balance of the car will be the same (lose the same amount in front and in rear). If you just change one end of the car, you're going to affect the handling balance. In this case, by going to all season rear tires, your car will be more likely to oversteer in dry conditions. If you don't drive the car hard, this won't be a problem but it may feel a little strange from a seat of the pants perspective. But again you won't do any damage.
Now if you do try to drive it hard on the street (or take it to a racetrack) with mismatched rear tires, it could become a problem because you may not be ready to handle the oversteer you could get. Also, if you ever get into an emergency avoidance situation, it could become a problem. For example if you need to avoid a deer on the highway and do a last second, high speed lane change you could end up going backwards at 70mph when you could have kept it under control with matched tires.
But that's the only real "risk" if you don't care about the performance loss.
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jason Bourne
sherman,
You certainly won't be doing any damage as long as you get tires that are correctly sized. My point is, as you suspect, related to performance. But it's a little bit different than just going from 4 summer tires to 4 all season tires. In that case, you will lose grip and handling performance but the balance of the car will be the same (lose the same amount in front and in rear). If you just change one end of the car, you're going to affect the handling balance. In this case, by going to all season rear tires, your car will be more likely to oversteer in dry conditions. If you don't drive the car hard, this won't be a problem but it may feel a little strange from a seat of the pants perspective. But again you won't do any damage.
Now if you do try to drive it hard on the street (or take it to a racetrack) with mismatched rear tires, it could become a problem because you may not be ready to handle the oversteer you could get. Also, if you ever get into an emergency avoidance situation, it could become a problem. For example if you need to avoid a deer on the highway and do a last second, high speed lane change you could end up going backwards at 70mph when you could have kept it under control with matched tires.
But that's the only real "risk" if you don't care about the performance loss.
sherman,
You certainly won't be doing any damage as long as you get tires that are correctly sized. My point is, as you suspect, related to performance. But it's a little bit different than just going from 4 summer tires to 4 all season tires. In that case, you will lose grip and handling performance but the balance of the car will be the same (lose the same amount in front and in rear). If you just change one end of the car, you're going to affect the handling balance. In this case, by going to all season rear tires, your car will be more likely to oversteer in dry conditions. If you don't drive the car hard, this won't be a problem but it may feel a little strange from a seat of the pants perspective. But again you won't do any damage.
Now if you do try to drive it hard on the street (or take it to a racetrack) with mismatched rear tires, it could become a problem because you may not be ready to handle the oversteer you could get. Also, if you ever get into an emergency avoidance situation, it could become a problem. For example if you need to avoid a deer on the highway and do a last second, high speed lane change you could end up going backwards at 70mph when you could have kept it under control with matched tires.
But that's the only real "risk" if you don't care about the performance loss.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by sherman
well said, and thanks.
well said, and thanks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boots patrol
Exterior
6
11-07-2015 12:26 PM
350Z Project X
Suspension
9
10-10-2015 09:23 AM