Maybe the "verified" text can be a hyperlink to the individual/separate post on the run. That way there can be a separate discussion for each time that can get into more detail on the run and setup of the car so people don't have to search through pages and pages that this thread will likely become. Just a thought, but obviously it's up to aceman if he wants to go to all that trouble. Either way I'm still happy with it just the way it is now and appreciate the time he's invested to date.

 

Wow, 1.57 is only .003 slower than the fastest 60' on the board. And it was done by a twin turbo. Thats faster than all the single turbo guys, 13 of the twin guys, all the supercharged and nitrous guys. I searched for the timeslip in the thread and don't see it. Id like to see the slip. Not calling BS < just like to see the whole timeline.

 

IIRC, his 2nd best 60' was a 1.7 seconds. I really think something happened with the system and malfunctioned to produce such an unbelievable number. Oh well.

 

Front page updated for you Dave

But yeah, its a better idea to have them all posted on this thread.

I have the list updated with all the info that was sent to me.

Thanks guys

Todd

 

Good point davidv!!

 

i think that if there is a fluke that is unbelievable , it should be backed up. i mean, most of the times are great and with in reach but something like that is just crazy.

that 1.57 60 foot would be really hard to achieve NA, and most of us know that our 60 foot times are usually consistent with what we are doing and fall within a .02 second range give or take...

possible that car was staged on back tires?? i have seen it countless times...

 

Here's my late timeslip



2003 Track Model 6 peed with pop charger, crawford hfc, stillen true dual exhaust, motordyne 5/16" spacer, BFG KDW 2 tires.

 

Where is the guy who ran 13.6X in his bone stock auto?? Id search but Im going to bed

 

search you stupid newbie

 

 

 

Why is topnotch350z's times the same on both the Bone Stock & Bolt On lists?

BigO109

 

I dont know what you are talking about

Thanks
Todd

 

Nevermind. I was looking at something else.

BigO109

 

owned

 

Naw, he was right, i changed it


Its all good, im glad you guys catch my mistakes.

Later
Todd

 

Damn. I'm glad you said something. I thought the BudLight was playing mind tricks on me last night!

BigO109

 

No, I know he was right. I was just saying owned because he simply submitted to you saying that it was never wrong.

 

I don't have the slip anymore, but in October this year I ran a 14.7something @ 94mph (spacer/injen intake, 275 p-zero's) and believe the 60' was 2.1 or so. This was on an '04.5 AT.

I'm not asking to have my time listed because it just doesn't compare. I live in Vegas and the DA for that particular day was over 5500'. Also what screwed my time was not realizing that I coulda ran 3rd til the end of the trap (which I'll do next time).

The question I have is this... How is this ranking list fair to someone who races at elevation? Or are there telltale numbers on the slip that gives up the fact the vehicle is running fast (even though ET/trap) is high? I've made several passes at the strip but am not sure how all the numbers correllate.

In the spring when the strip here opens back up, I'll post a slip and hopefully get it dissected by the gurus here.

 

The listing is imperfect because of conditions such as elevation, barometric pressure, temperature and humidity. We could adjust each time but that would be a major headache.

I have accumulated several years of time slips, and must judge the difference between my skills (or lack of) and how the car is performing. Keep in mind that I am competing, and selecting an accurate dial-in is critical.


Here is a typical practice run where I am sloppy but the car is running well. During the second 660 feet I am picking up 22 mpg. Thats good for me. But a 2.1 second 60 foot time is sloppy: I can run 2.0 seconds. For my first round of eliminations I might dial-in 13.58 seconds because I know that the car is capable of 13.58 seconds.