Who has the highest HP N/A Z
05-15-2006, 03:29 PM
#61
Lighten up Frances. sja177 is entitled to his opinion just like everyone else. Having a questioning attitude on these forums is necessary if you don't want to get taken. We all know that if it wasn't for the opportunity to make a buck, some of us would not be here. Peace.
05-15-2006, 03:36 PM
#62
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: King of Materbation
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That dyno above was done at Church automotive. Iam not going to put down Church's dyno but a stock Z pulled 258whp. Which we all know is really high. The bad thing about most dyno's is you can setup the dyno to read ANY number you want with the correction factor. (ESP dynapaks) But most tuners with an dynapak will set it up to mimmic DYNOJET #'s.
Hammads car is realistically a 255-265whp car. Rickdoggs car would pull about 265-270whp. A UTEC would most certainly give them another 5-10whp. But without getting internal NO ONE is going to hit 300whp NA on 93octane. SGP has built 3 NA cars with pistons, headwork, unichip and special grind cams and are coming up with around 290whp on 93 octane.
I believe Jermaine,s dyno was legit. How does anyone know he didnt use C16 and throw **** loads of timing on the car and tuned it to that. Its VERY possibly to hit those numbers with racegas and a great tune. It would just cost about $100 a day to drive
Hammads car is realistically a 255-265whp car. Rickdoggs car would pull about 265-270whp. A UTEC would most certainly give them another 5-10whp. But without getting internal NO ONE is going to hit 300whp NA on 93octane. SGP has built 3 NA cars with pistons, headwork, unichip and special grind cams and are coming up with around 290whp on 93 octane.
I believe Jermaine,s dyno was legit. How does anyone know he didnt use C16 and throw **** loads of timing on the car and tuned it to that. Its VERY possibly to hit those numbers with racegas and a great tune. It would just cost about $100 a day to drive
Last edited by EM-EFER; 05-15-2006 at 03:38 PM.
05-15-2006, 03:57 PM
#63
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EM-EFER
That dyno above was done at Church automotive. Iam not going to put down Church's dyno but a stock Z pulled 258whp. Which we all know is really high. The bad thing about most dyno's is you can setup the dyno to read ANY number you want with the correction factor. (ESP dynapaks) But most tuners with an dynapak will set it up to mimmic DYNOJET #'s.
Hammads car is realistically a 255-265whp car. Rickdoggs car would pull about 265-270whp. A UTEC would most certainly give them another 5-10whp. But without getting internal NO ONE is going to hit 300whp NA on 93octane. SGP has built 3 NA cars with pistons, headwork, unichip and special grind cams and are coming up with around 290whp on 93 octane.
I believe Jermaine,s dyno was legit. How does anyone know he didnt use C16 and throw **** loads of timing on the car and tuned it to that. Its VERY possibly to hit those numbers with racegas and a great tune. It would just cost about $100 a day to drive
Hammads car is realistically a 255-265whp car. Rickdoggs car would pull about 265-270whp. A UTEC would most certainly give them another 5-10whp. But without getting internal NO ONE is going to hit 300whp NA on 93octane. SGP has built 3 NA cars with pistons, headwork, unichip and special grind cams and are coming up with around 290whp on 93 octane.
I believe Jermaine,s dyno was legit. How does anyone know he didnt use C16 and throw **** loads of timing on the car and tuned it to that. Its VERY possibly to hit those numbers with racegas and a great tune. It would just cost about $100 a day to drive
05-15-2006, 03:59 PM
#64
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by undrgnd
Lighten up Frances. sja177 is entitled to his opinion just like everyone else. Having a questioning attitude on these forums is necessary if you don't want to get taken. We all know that if it wasn't for the opportunity to make a buck, some of us would not be here. Peace.
05-15-2006, 04:02 PM
#65
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EM-EFER
That dyno above was done at Church automotive. Iam not going to put down Church's dyno but a stock Z pulled 258whp. Which we all know is really high. The bad thing about most dyno's is you can setup the dyno to read ANY number you want with the correction factor. (ESP dynapaks) But most tuners with an dynapak will set it up to mimmic DYNOJET #'s.
Hammads car is realistically a 255-265whp car. Rickdoggs car would pull about 265-270whp. A UTEC would most certainly give them another 5-10whp. But without getting internal NO ONE is going to hit 300whp NA on 93octane. SGP has built 3 NA cars with pistons, headwork, unichip and special grind cams and are coming up with around 290whp on 93 octane.
I believe Jermaine,s dyno was legit. How does anyone know he didnt use C16 and throw **** loads of timing on the car and tuned it to that. Its VERY possibly to hit those numbers with racegas and a great tune. It would just cost about $100 a day to drive
Hammads car is realistically a 255-265whp car. Rickdoggs car would pull about 265-270whp. A UTEC would most certainly give them another 5-10whp. But without getting internal NO ONE is going to hit 300whp NA on 93octane. SGP has built 3 NA cars with pistons, headwork, unichip and special grind cams and are coming up with around 290whp on 93 octane.
I believe Jermaine,s dyno was legit. How does anyone know he didnt use C16 and throw **** loads of timing on the car and tuned it to that. Its VERY possibly to hit those numbers with racegas and a great tune. It would just cost about $100 a day to drive
05-15-2006, 05:32 PM
#67
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
50rwhp over stock is possible. It takes some hard work and some big cams. Take a look at Doug's thread posted awhile ago.
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/166639-latest-crawford-dynos.html
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/166639-latest-crawford-dynos.html
05-15-2006, 06:50 PM
#69
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by thawk408
50rwhp over stock is possible. It takes some hard work and some big cams. Take a look at Doug's thread posted awhile ago.
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=166639
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=166639
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FromGtoZ
Intake Exhaust
2
09-20-2015 03:41 PM
